Suppr超能文献

大鼠肝纤维化的偏倚量化——荟萃分析及实用建议与临床意义

Biased Quantification of Rat Liver Fibrosis-Meta-Analysis with Practical Recommendations and Clinical Implications.

作者信息

Mik Patrik, Barannikava Katsiaryna, Surkova Polina

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.

Biomedical Center and Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 1;12(15):5072. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155072.

Abstract

For liver fibrosis assessment, the liver biopsy is usually stained with Masson's trichrome (MT) or picrosirius red (PSR) to quantify liver connective tissue (LCT) for fibrosis scoring. However, several concerns of such semiquantitative assessments have been raised, and when searching for data on the amount of LCT in healthy rats, the results vastly differ. Regarding the ongoing reproducibility crisis in science, it is necessary to inspect the results and methods, and to design an unbiased and reproducible method of LCT assessment. We searched the Medline database using search terms related to liver fibrosis, LCT and collagen, rat strains, and staining methods. Our search identified 74 eligible rat groups in 57 studies. We found up to 170-fold differences in the amount of LCT among healthy Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats, with significant differences even within individual studies. Biased sampling and quantification probably caused the observed differences. In addition, we also found incorrect handling of liver fibrosis scoring. Assessment of LCT using stereological sampling methods (such as systematic uniform sampling) would provide us with unbiased data. Such data could eventually be used not only for the objective assessment of liver fibrosis but also for validation of noninvasive methods of the assessment of early stages of liver fibrosis.

摘要

对于肝纤维化评估,肝活检通常用马松三色染色法(MT)或苦味酸天狼星红染色法(PSR)染色,以量化肝结缔组织(LCT)用于纤维化评分。然而,这种半定量评估引发了一些问题,在搜索健康大鼠LCT量的数据时,结果差异很大。鉴于科学领域当前存在的可重复性危机,有必要检查结果和方法,并设计一种无偏且可重复的LCT评估方法。我们使用与肝纤维化、LCT和胶原蛋白、大鼠品系以及染色方法相关的搜索词在Medline数据库中进行了检索。我们的检索在57项研究中确定了74个符合条件的大鼠组。我们发现健康的Wistar大鼠和Sprague-Dawley大鼠之间LCT量的差异高达170倍,甚至在个别研究中也存在显著差异。有偏差的抽样和量化可能导致了观察到的差异。此外,我们还发现了肝纤维化评分处理不当的情况。使用体视学抽样方法(如系统均匀抽样)评估LCT将为我们提供无偏数据。这些数据最终不仅可用于肝纤维化的客观评估,还可用于验证肝纤维化早期评估的非侵入性方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c16/10420125/a1adfc107448/jcm-12-05072-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验