• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少上班族久坐行为的常见认知障碍和促进因素。

Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers.

机构信息

The Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden.

The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), 11486 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 18;15(4):792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040792.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15040792
PMID:29670047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5923834/
Abstract

Qualitative studies identified barriers and facilitators associated with work-related sedentary behaviour. The objective of this study was to determine common perceived barriers and facilitators among office workers, assess subgroup differences, and describe sedentary behaviour. From two Swedish companies, 547 office workers (41 years (IQR = 35–48), 65% women, 66% highly educated) completed questionnaires on perceived barriers and facilitators, for which subgroup differences in age, gender, education, and workplace sedentary behaviour were assessed. Sedentary behaviour was measured using inclinometers ( = 311). The most frequently reported barrier was sitting is a habit (67%), which was reported more among women than men (Χ² = 5.14, = 0.03) and more among highly sedentary office workers (Χ² = 9.26, < 0.01). The two other most reported barriers were that standing is uncomfortable (29%) and standing is tiring (24%). Facilitators with the most support were the introduction of either standing- or walking-meetings (respectively 33% and 29%) and more possibilities or reminders for breaks (31%). The proportion spent sedentary was 64% at the workplace, 61% on working days, and 57% on non-working days. This study provides a detailed understanding of office workers’ ideas about sitting and means to reduce sitting. We advise to include the supported facilitators and individualized support in interventions to work towards more effective strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour.

摘要

定性研究确定了与工作相关的久坐行为相关的障碍和促进因素。本研究的目的是确定办公室工作人员普遍认为的障碍和促进因素,评估亚组差异,并描述久坐行为。在两家瑞典公司中,有 547 名办公室工作人员(41 岁(IQR = 35–48),65%为女性,66%为高学历)完成了关于感知障碍和促进因素的问卷,评估了年龄、性别、教育和工作场所久坐行为的亚组差异。使用测斜仪( = 311)测量久坐行为。报告最多的障碍是坐着是一种习惯(67%),女性比男性报告的更多(Χ² = 5.14, = 0.03),高度久坐的办公室工作人员报告的更多(Χ² = 9.26, < 0.01)。另外两个报告最多的障碍是站立不舒服(29%)和站立累人(24%)。支持率最高的促进因素是引入站立会议或步行会议(分别为 33%和 29%)以及更多的休息机会或提醒(31%)。工作场所的久坐时间比例为 64%,工作日为 61%,非工作日为 57%。本研究详细了解了办公室工作人员对坐着的看法以及减少坐着的方法。我们建议在干预措施中纳入支持的促进因素和个性化支持,以努力制定更有效的减少久坐行为的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d68/5923834/d4a0aeacfb9a/ijerph-15-00792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d68/5923834/d4a0aeacfb9a/ijerph-15-00792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d68/5923834/d4a0aeacfb9a/ijerph-15-00792-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers.减少上班族久坐行为的常见认知障碍和促进因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 18;15(4):792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040792.
2
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Breaking Up Sitting Time among Desk-Based Office Workers: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B.基于 TDF 和 COM-B 的定性研究:探究伏案办公人员打破久坐行为的阻碍和促进因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;16(16):2903. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162903.
3
Improving office workers' mental health and cognition: a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial targeting physical activity and sedentary behavior in multi-component interventions.改善办公人员心理健康和认知能力:针对多组分干预中身体活动和久坐行为的 3 臂群组随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 5;19(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6589-4.
4
Feasibility and acceptability of reducing workplace sitting time: a qualitative study with Australian office workers.减少工作场所久坐时间的可行性与可接受性:一项针对澳大利亚办公室职员的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 5;16(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3611-y.
5
A qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary time in adults with chronic low back pain.对慢性下腰痛成年人减少久坐时间的障碍与促进因素的定性分析
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;21(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10238-5.
6
The effectiveness of multi-component interventions targeting physical activity or sedentary behaviour amongst office workers: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial.针对办公人员身体活动或久坐行为的多组分干预措施的效果:一项三臂整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):1329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09433-7.
7
Perceptions of the acceptability and feasibility of reducing occupational sitting: review and thematic synthesis.减少职业性久坐可接受性和可行性的认知:综述和主题综合分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Sep 18;15(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0718-9.
8
Occupational sitting time, its determinants and intervention strategies in Malaysian office workers: a mixed-methods study.马来西亚办公室职员的职业久坐时间、其决定因素及干预策略:一项混合方法研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab149.
9
Assessing and understanding sedentary behaviour in office-based working adults: a mixed-method approach.评估与理解办公室上班族的久坐行为:一种混合方法研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3023-z.
10
Office workers' experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study.办公室工作人员减少久坐时间的尝试体验:一项探索性、混合方法、非对照干预性试点研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7196-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring experiences and perceptions of early withdrawal from a height-adjustable sit-to-stand desk intervention among South African office workers.探索南非办公室职员提前退出高度可调节坐站两用办公桌干预措施的经历和看法。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):1209. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22415-x.
2
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Performing Evening Regular Activity Breaks at Home: A COM-B Analysis.在家进行晚间常规活动休息的感知障碍与促进因素:一种COM-B分析
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Nov 19. doi: 10.1007/s12529-024-10334-x.
3
Attitudes towards air quality during outdoor exercise amongst habitual exercisers.

本文引用的文献

1
Considerations when using the activPAL monitor in field-based research with adult populations.在针对成年人群体的实地研究中使用activPAL监测仪时的注意事项。
J Sport Health Sci. 2017 Jun;6(2):162-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
2
Are changes in occupational physical activity level compensated by changes in exercise behavior?职业体力活动水平的变化是否会被运动行为的变化所补偿?
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Oct 1;28(5):940-943. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky007.
3
Feasibility and acceptability of reducing workplace sitting time: a qualitative study with Australian office workers.
习惯性锻炼者在户外运动时对空气质量的态度。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Nov;24(11):1671-1679. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12194. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
4
Effects of a sedentary behaviour intervention in emergency dispatch centre phone operators: a study protocol for the SECODIS randomised controlled cross-over trial.久坐行为干预对紧急调度中心电话接线员的影响:SECODIS 随机对照交叉试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 9;14(10):e080177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080177.
5
"Balancing work and movement": barriers and enablers for being physically active at Indian workplaces - findings from SMART STEP trial.“平衡工作和运动”:印度工作场所身体活动的障碍和促进因素——SMART STEP 试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 27;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01661-z.
6
Hybrid office work in women and men: do directly measured physical behaviors differ between days working from home and days working at the office?女性和男性的混合办公模式:在家办公日和在办公室办公日的直接测量身体行为有差异吗?
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Nov 28;67(9):1043-1055. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad057.
7
"It depends on the boss" - a qualitative study of multi-level interventions aiming at office workers' movement behaviour and mental health.“这取决于老板”——一项旨在改善上班族运动行为和心理健康的多层次干预措施的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2258564. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2258564. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
8
A Social Cognitive Assessment of Workplace Sedentary Behavior among a Sample of University Employees.对大学员工样本中工作场所久坐行为的社会认知评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 31;20(15):6476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156476.
9
Effect of Weight Goals on Sitting and Moving During a Worksite Sedentary Time Reduction Intervention.体重目标对工作场所久坐时间减少干预期间坐姿和活动的影响。
Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2022 Fall;7(4). doi: 10.1249/tjx.0000000000000210. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
The effect of two multi-component behavior change interventions on cognitive functions.两种多成分行为改变干预措施对认知功能的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 31;22(1):1082. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13490-5.
减少工作场所久坐时间的可行性与可接受性:一项针对澳大利亚办公室职员的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 5;16(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3611-y.
4
Office workers' objectively assessed total and prolonged sitting time: Individual-level correlates and worksite variations.办公人员客观评估的总时长和长时间坐姿:个体水平相关因素和工作场所差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Jun 15;4:184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.06.011. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Assessing and understanding sedentary behaviour in office-based working adults: a mixed-method approach.评估与理解办公室上班族的久坐行为:一种混合方法研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3023-z.
6
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
7
"They should stay at their desk until the work's done": a qualitative study examining perceptions of sedentary behaviour in a desk-based occupational setting.“在工作完成之前,他们应该一直坐在办公桌前”:一项定性研究,考察在以办公桌为基础的职业环境中对久坐行为的认知。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 17;8:683. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1670-2.
8
Using Sit-to-Stand Workstations in Offices: Is There a Compensation Effect?在办公室使用坐站两用工作站:是否存在补偿效应?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Apr;48(4):720-5. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000802.
9
The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity.久坐的办公环境:改善健康和提高生产力的专家观点。
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;49(21):1357-62. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094618. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
10
Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.久坐时间与成年人疾病发病率、死亡率和住院率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32. doi: 10.7326/M14-1651.