University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Feb;28(1):81-116. doi: 10.1177/10888683231183479. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
One of the key challenges to researching psychological acculturation is the immense heterogeneity in theories and measures. These inconsistencies make it difficult to compare past literature, hinder straightforward measurement selections, and stifle theoretical integration. To structure acculturation, we propose to utilize the four basic aspects of human experiences (wanting, feeling, thinking, and doing) as a conceptual framework. We use this framework to build a theory-driven assessment of past theoretical (final = 92), psychometric (final = 233), and empirical literature (final = 530). We find that the framework allows us to examine and compare past conceptualizations. For example, empirical works have understudied the more internal aspects of acculturation (i.e., motivations and feelings) compared with theoretical works. We, then, discuss the framework's novel insights including its temporal resolution, its comprehensive and cross-cultural structure, and how the framework can aid transparent and functional theories, studies, and interventions going forward.
This systematic scoping review indicates that the concept of psychological acculturation can be structured in terms of affect (e.g., feeling at home), behavior (e.g., language use), cognition (e.g., ethnic identification), and desire (e.g., independence wish). We find that the framework is useful in structuring past research and helps with new predictions and interventions. We, for example, find a crucial disconnect between theory and practice, which will need to be resolved in the future.
研究心理文化适应的一个关键挑战是理论和测量方法的巨大异质性。这些不一致使得比较过去的文献变得困难,阻碍了直接的测量选择,并抑制了理论的整合。为了构建文化适应,我们建议使用人类经验的四个基本方面(想要、感觉、思考和行动)作为概念框架。我们使用这个框架来构建对过去理论(最终=92)、心理测量(最终=233)和实证文献(最终=530)的理论驱动评估。我们发现该框架允许我们检查和比较过去的概念化。例如,实证研究与理论研究相比,对文化适应的更内在方面(即动机和感受)研究不足。然后,我们讨论了该框架的新颖见解,包括其时间分辨率、全面的跨文化结构,以及该框架如何有助于未来透明和有效的理论、研究和干预。
这项系统的范围综述表明,心理文化适应的概念可以用情感(例如,有归属感)、行为(例如,语言使用)、认知(例如,民族认同)和欲望(例如,独立愿望)来构建。我们发现该框架在构建过去的研究方面很有用,并有助于进行新的预测和干预。例如,我们发现理论和实践之间存在一个关键的脱节,未来需要解决这个问题。