• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版气味意识量表的因子结构和心理测量特性

Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Odor Awareness Scale.

作者信息

Zhang Binfeng, Li Xiuxia, Tan Peixuan, Liu Yuxing, He Wanyong, Wang Lu, Huang Shuling, Nie Guanghui

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 27;14:1228179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1228179. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1228179
PMID:37575563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10415028/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Odor Awareness Scale (OAS) is a questionnaire that assesses individual differences in awareness of odors in the surrounding environment, which has been shown to be associated with affective symptoms in recent researches. To further research, A Chinese version of the OAS needs to be introduced.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factor structure and validate the psychometric properties of the OAS.

METHODS

A total of 978 participants from college were randomly allocated into two groups for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. Additionally, the study entailed item analysis and scrutinized internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity. Test-retest reliability was assessed by having 214 participants complete the OAS twice at a one-week interval. Concurrent validity was measured using the Body Odor Sniffing Questionnaire (BOSQ), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20).

RESULTS

EFA identified three factors that best fit the data: odor sensitivity, odor impact, and odor attention. CFA validated a second-order factor model, yielding good fit indices: / Df = 2.326, RMSEA = 0.052, CFI = 0.911, TLI = 0.900, SRMR = 0.053. The final version of the OAS comprised 27 items and exhibited a commendable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.913), and a good test-retest reliability, as evidenced by the high Pearson correlation coefficient ( = 0.940) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.940). The OAS was significantly correlated with BOSQ ( = 0.416), GAD-7 ( = 0.155), and TAS-20 ( = -0.081).

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the OAS demonstrated robust reliability and validity, rendering it a valuable instrument for evaluating odor awareness in the Chinese population.

摘要

背景

气味觉察量表(OAS)是一种用于评估个体对周围环境中气味觉察差异的问卷,近期研究表明其与情感症状相关。为进一步开展研究,需要引入OAS的中文版。

目的

探讨OAS的因子结构并验证其心理测量学特性。

方法

共978名大学生被随机分为两组,分别进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。此外,该研究还进行了项目分析,并考察了内部一致性信度、重测信度和同时效度。通过让214名参与者在一周间隔内两次完成OAS来评估重测信度。使用体臭嗅闻问卷(BOSQ)、广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)和多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)来测量同时效度。

结果

EFA确定了最符合数据的三个因子:气味敏感度、气味影响和气味注意力。CFA验证了一个二阶因子模型,得到了良好的拟合指数:χ²/ Df = 2.326,RMSEA = 0.052,CFI = 0.911,TLI = 0.900,SRMR = 0.053。OAS的最终版本包含27个项目,表现出良好的内部一致性信度(Cronbach's α = 0.913)和良好的重测信度,高皮尔逊相关系数(r = 0.940)和组内相关系数(ICC = 0.940)证明了这一点。OAS与BOSQ(r = 0.416)、GAD-7(r = 0.155)和TAS-20(r = -0.081)显著相关。

结论

OAS中文版表现出可靠的信度和效度,使其成为评估中国人群气味觉察的有价值工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e8/10415028/2626cda07c7f/fpsyt-14-1228179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e8/10415028/2626cda07c7f/fpsyt-14-1228179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e8/10415028/2626cda07c7f/fpsyt-14-1228179-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Odor Awareness Scale.中文版气味意识量表的因子结构和心理测量特性
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 27;14:1228179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1228179. eCollection 2023.
2
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
3
[The Spanish version of two olfactory scales: reliability and validity].[两种嗅觉量表的西班牙语版本:信度和效度]
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2011 Oct;4(4):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
4
Measuring self-as-context in Chinese college students: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of self-as-context scale (C-SACS).测量中国大学生的自我即情境:中文版自我即情境量表(C-SACS)的效度和信度
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1051661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051661. eCollection 2022.
5
Validation of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the active-empathic listening scale.中文版积极共情倾听量表的信效度验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 23;13:938461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.938461. eCollection 2022.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Academic Resilience Scale-30 (C-ARS-30) in college students.大学生中文版学术复原力量表30(C-ARS-30)的心理测量学评估
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1276618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276618. eCollection 2024.
7
The reliability, validity and factorial structure of the Swahili version of the 7-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7) among adults living with HIV from Kilifi, Kenya.肯尼亚基利菲地区感染艾滋病毒的成年人中,斯瓦希里语版7项广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)的信度、效度和因子结构。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 28;19:62. doi: 10.1186/s12991-020-00312-4. eCollection 2020.
8
The social odor scale: Development and initial validation of a new scale for the assessment of social odor awareness.社会气味量表:用于评估社会气味意识的新量表的编制及初步验证
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 14;16(12):e0260587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260587. eCollection 2021.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the inventory of dimensions of emerging adulthood (IDEA) in China.中国新兴成年期维度量表(IDEA)的心理测量学评估
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Jan-Apr;23(1):100331. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100331. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
10
Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Functioning Self-Assessment Scale in community-dwelling adults: A cross-sectional online survey.社区居住成年人认知功能自我评估量表的心理测量学特性:一项横断面在线调查。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1122198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122198. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship of personality, alexithymia, anxiety symptoms, and odor awareness: a mediation analysis.人格、述情障碍、焦虑症状与嗅觉意识的关系:中介分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05653-y.
2
Knowledge, Awareness, and Practice of Safety and Emergency Response Among Scuba Divers in Malaysia: Questionnaire Development and Validation.马来西亚水肺潜水员的安全与应急响应知识、意识及实践:问卷编制与验证
Cureus. 2024 Feb 3;16(2):e53521. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53521. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Do you often sniff yourself or others? Development of the Body Odor Sniffing Questionnaire and a cross-cultural survey in China and the USA.你是否经常嗅自己或他人的体味?体臭嗅探问卷的制定及中美跨文化调查。
Physiol Behav. 2022 Oct 15;255:113934. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113934. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
Olfactory meta-cognition in individuals with depressive and anxiety symptoms: The differential role of common and social odors.抑郁和焦虑症状个体的嗅觉元认知:常见气味和社交气味的不同作用。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.071. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
The social odor scale: Development and initial validation of a new scale for the assessment of social odor awareness.
社会气味量表:用于评估社会气味意识的新量表的编制及初步验证
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 14;16(12):e0260587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260587. eCollection 2021.
4
Age-Related Cognitive Decline and the Olfactory Identification Deficit Are Associated to Increased Level of Depression.年龄相关的认知衰退和嗅觉识别缺陷与抑郁水平升高有关。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Feb 22;15:599593. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.599593. eCollection 2021.
5
Global study of variability in olfactory sensitivity.全球嗅觉敏感性变化研究。
Behav Neurosci. 2020 Oct;134(5):394-406. doi: 10.1037/bne0000378.
6
Evaluation of psychometric properties of instruments measuring nursing-sensitive outcomes: a systematic review.评估测量护理敏感结局的工具的心理计量学特性:系统评价。
Int Nurs Rev. 2019 Jun;66(2):209-223. doi: 10.1111/inr.12495. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
7
Olfactory processing in bipolar disorder, major depression, and anxiety.双相情感障碍、重度抑郁症和焦虑症中的嗅觉处理
Bipolar Disord. 2018 Sep;20(6):547-555. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12625. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Olfactory Functioning and Depression: A Systematic Review.嗅觉功能与抑郁症:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 28;8:190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00190. eCollection 2017.
9
Both anxiety and joint laxity determine the olfactory features in panic disorder.焦虑和关节松弛都会影响惊恐障碍的嗅觉特征。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
Understanding the relationship between olfactory-specific quality of life, objective olfactory loss, and patient factors in chronic rhinosinusitis.了解慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者嗅觉特异性生活质量、客观嗅觉减退与患者因素之间的关系。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 Jul;7(7):734-740. doi: 10.1002/alr.21940. Epub 2017 May 18.