• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受园艺启发:对学术医疗中心花园参与者体验的定性研究。

Inspired to Garden: A Qualitative Study of Participants' Experiences in an Academic Medical Center Garden.

作者信息

Moore Heather, Boisvert Keelan, Bryan Maria, Hoare Lisa, Gates Michelle, Garnett Bernice, Kennedy Amanda G, Latreille Michael

机构信息

Director, Shelburne Craft School, Shelburne, USA.

College of Arts and Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 11;15(7):e41695. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41695. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.41695
PMID:37575742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10413914/
Abstract

Introduction Gardening is a healthy activity that promotes nutrition and satisfaction, with positive impacts on patients with chronic diseases, including patients with obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Hospital-based gardening programs may provide opportunities to introduce patients to gardening. However, few studies have included participant experience as a metric of evaluation. The objective of this study was to explore participant experience in a hospital-based gardening intervention designed for individuals with metabolic syndrome. Methods This study was a qualitative evaluation of free text responses from four questions included in post-participation questionnaires from 59 community-dwelling adults who participated in a hospital-based garden program located at the University of Vermont Medical Center in 2020 and 2021. Eligible participants included a convenience sample of novice gardeners with self-reported hypertension, diabetes, pre-diabetes, or overweight/obesity. We used an interpretative phenomenological approach to analyze the questionnaire data. The phenomenological cycle for each of the questions included: 1) reading and re-reading participant responses, 2) exploratory noting, 3) constructing experimental statements, 4) searching for connections across statements, and 5) naming the themes. This process also involved working with individual question-level themes to develop group themes across questions. Results This dataset was one of positivity about gardening, new information gleaned, and the quality of instruction. Several themes and codes emerged: program implementation (new knowledge, new skills, new connections, instructor ability, climate), self-efficacy (confidence, vicarious experience, mastery experience, verbal persuasion), and future change (behavior change, future issues/problem-solving, passing it on). Conclusion This study supports analyzing participant experience as part of hospital-based gardening interventions. We found positivity around program implementation, increased self-efficacy, and intentions to change behavior in ways that support healthy lifestyles.

摘要

引言 园艺是一项促进营养摄入和满足感的健康活动,对包括肥胖症、糖尿病和心血管疾病患者在内的慢性病患者具有积极影响。基于医院的园艺项目可能为患者提供接触园艺的机会。然而,很少有研究将参与者的体验作为评估指标。本研究的目的是探索参与一项为代谢综合征患者设计的基于医院的园艺干预项目的参与者体验。方法 本研究是对59名社区居住成年人参与后问卷中四个问题的自由文本回复进行的定性评估,这些成年人于2020年和2021年参加了佛蒙特大学医学中心开展的一项基于医院的园艺项目。符合条件的参与者包括一个方便样本,即自我报告患有高血压、糖尿病、糖尿病前期或超重/肥胖的新手园艺爱好者。我们采用解释现象学方法分析问卷数据。每个问题的现象学循环包括:1)阅读和反复阅读参与者的回复,2)探索性记录,3)构建实验性陈述,4)寻找陈述之间的联系,5)命名主题。这个过程还包括处理单个问题层面的主题,以形成跨问题的组主题。结果 该数据集体现了对园艺的积极态度、新获得的信息以及教学质量。出现了几个主题和编码:项目实施(新知识、新技能、新联系、指导者能力、气候)、自我效能感(信心、替代性经验、掌握经验、言语劝说)以及未来改变(行为改变、未来问题/解决问题、传承下去)。结论 本研究支持将参与者体验分析作为基于医院的园艺干预的一部分。我们发现参与者对项目实施持积极态度,自我效能感增强,并且有以支持健康生活方式的方式改变行为的意愿。

相似文献

1
Inspired to Garden: A Qualitative Study of Participants' Experiences in an Academic Medical Center Garden.受园艺启发:对学术医疗中心花园参与者体验的定性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 11;15(7):e41695. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41695. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Participant Preferences for the Development of a Digitally Delivered Gardening Intervention to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Cardiovascular Health: Cross-sectional Study.参与者对开发数字化园艺干预措施以改善饮食、身体活动和心血管健康的偏好:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 2;7:e41498. doi: 10.2196/41498.
3
Improving lifestyles sustainability through community gardening: results and lessons learnt from the JArDinS quasi-experimental study.通过社区园艺提高生活方式的可持续性:来自JArDinS准实验研究的结果与经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):1798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09836-6.
4
"You feel like you're part of something bigger": exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia.“你会觉得自己是更宏大事物的一部分”:探究澳大利亚墨尔本社区花园参与动机。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):745. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7108-3.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Growing Healthy Hearts: a single-arm feasibility study of a digitally delivered gardening, cooking, and nutrition intervention for adults with risk factors for cardiovascular disease.培育健康心脏:一项针对有心血管疾病风险因素的成年人的数字化园艺、烹饪和营养干预单臂可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Aug 31;9(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01380-5.
8
Mixed-Methods Implementation Study of a Home Garden Intervention in Rural Guatemala Using the RE-AIM Framework.农村危地马拉家庭园艺干预措施实施的混合方法研究:基于 RE-AIM 框架
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Jul;122(7):1363-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
9
Grow This!《培育这一点!》
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Nov;24(6):1230-1236. doi: 10.1177/15248399221102919. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
10
Growing Healthy Hearts: Gardening Program Feasibility in a Hospital-Based Community Garden.培育健康心脏:医院社区花园中园艺计划的可行性。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Oct;52(10):958-963. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of a Hospital-Based Kitchen Garden.基于医院的菜园的可行性。
HERD. 2024 Jul;17(3):10-18. doi: 10.1177/19375867241250318. Epub 2024 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of self-care behaviors and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 型糖尿病患者自我护理行为和血糖控制的预测因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;10:1031655. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1031655. eCollection 2022.
2
5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.5. 促进积极的健康行为和幸福感以改善健康结局:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Supple 1):S68-S96. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S005.
3
Gardening Is Associated With Better Cardiovascular Health Status Among Older Adults in the United States: Analysis of the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.园艺与美国老年人心血管健康状况改善相关:2019 年行为风险因素监测系统调查分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023 May;123(5):761-769.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.10.018. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
4
Experiences of gardening during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.园艺体验在 COVID-19 大流行初期。
Health Place. 2022 Jul;76:102854. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102854. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
5
The Effects of Horticultural Activity Program on Vegetable Preference of Elementary School Students.园艺活动方案对小学生蔬菜偏好的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158100.
6
Evidence on the contribution of community gardens to promote physical and mental health and well-being of non-institutionalized individuals: A systematic review.社区花园对促进非机构化个体身心健康和幸福感的贡献的证据:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0255621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255621. eCollection 2021.
7
The association between self-efficacy and self-care in essential hypertension: a systematic review.自我效能与原发性高血压自我护理的关系:系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Feb 22;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01391-2.
8
Growing Healthy Hearts: Gardening Program Feasibility in a Hospital-Based Community Garden.培育健康心脏:医院社区花园中园艺计划的可行性。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Oct;52(10):958-963. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.006.
9
What is the evidence for the impact of gardens and gardening on health and well-being: a scoping review and evidence-based logic model to guide healthcare strategy decision making on the use of gardening approaches as a social prescription.园艺和园林对健康和幸福感的影响的证据是什么:一项范围综述和基于证据的逻辑模型,以指导医疗保健策略决策,将园艺方法作为一种社会处方使用。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 19;10(7):e036923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036923.
10
Trends in the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in the United States, 2011-2016.美国代谢综合征流行趋势,2011-2016 年。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2526-2528. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4501.