Nwanaji-Enwerem Jamaji C, Cardenas Andres, Gao Xu, Wang Cuicui, Vokonas Pantel, Spiro Avron, Osborne Anwar D, Kosheleva Anna, Hou Lifang, Baccarelli Andrea A, Schwartz Joel
Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Transl Med Aging. 2023;7:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tma.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
Psychological stress remains an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality throughout the life course. However, there have been counterintuitive findings reported in previous studies of older persons that examine the relationships of perceived psychological stress with DNA methylation-based markers of aging, which also serve as predictors of morbidity and mortality (epigenetic age/clocks). We aimed to replicate and expand findings from existing work by examining relationships of self-reported stress with nine epigenetic clocks: Hannum, Horvath, Intrinsic, Extrinsic, SkinBloodClock, PhenoAge, GrimAge, DNAm Telomere Length, and Pace of Aging. We analyzed data from 607 male participants (mean age 73.2 years) of the VA Normative Aging Study with one to two study visits from 1999 to 2007 (observations = 956). Stress was assessed via the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Epigenetic age was calculated from DNA methylation measured in leukocytes with the HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. In linear mixed effects models adjusted for demographic/lifestyle/health factors, a standard deviation (sd) increase in PSS was associated with Horvath (β = -0.35-years, 95%CI: -0.61, -0.09, =0.008) and Intrinsic (β = -0.40-years, 95%CI: -0.67, -0.13, =0.004) epigenetic age deceleration. However, in models limited to participants with the highest levels of stress (≥ 75-percentile), Horvath (β = 2.29-years, 95%CI: 0.16, 4.41, =0.04) and Intrinsic (β = 2.06-years, 95%CI: -0.17, 4.28, =0.07) age acceleration associations were observed. Our results reinforce the complexity of psychological stress and epigenetic aging relationships and lay a foundation for future studies that explore longitudinal relationships with other adult stress metrics and factors that can influence stress such as resilience measures.
心理压力仍然是贯穿人生历程的发病率和死亡率的重要风险因素。然而,在以往针对老年人的研究中,有一些与直觉相悖的发现,这些研究考察了感知到的心理压力与基于DNA甲基化的衰老标志物之间的关系,这些标志物也可作为发病率和死亡率的预测指标(表观遗传年龄/时钟)。我们旨在通过研究自我报告的压力与九个表观遗传时钟之间的关系来重复和扩展现有研究的结果:汉纳姆时钟、霍瓦特时钟、内在时钟、外在时钟、皮肤血液时钟、表型年龄时钟、 GrimAge时钟、DNAm端粒长度时钟和衰老速度时钟。我们分析了来自退伍军人规范衰老研究的607名男性参与者(平均年龄73.2岁)的数据,这些参与者在1999年至2007年期间进行了一到两次研究访问(观察次数 = 956)。通过14项感知压力量表(PSS)评估压力。表观遗传年龄是根据使用HumanMethylation450 BeadChip在白细胞中测量的DNA甲基化计算得出的。在针对人口统计学/生活方式/健康因素进行调整的线性混合效应模型中,PSS增加一个标准差(sd)与霍瓦特时钟(β = -0.35岁,95%置信区间:-0.61,-0.09,P = 0.008)和内在时钟(β = -0.40岁,95%置信区间:-0.67,-0.13,P = 0.004)的表观遗传年龄减速相关。然而,在仅限于压力水平最高(≥第75百分位数)的参与者的模型中,观察到霍瓦特时钟(β = 2.29岁,95%置信区间:0.16,4.41,P = 0.04)和内在时钟(β = 2.06岁,95%置信区间:-0.17,4.2 8,P = 0.07)的年龄加速关联。我们的结果强化了心理压力与表观遗传衰老关系的复杂性,并为未来研究奠定了基础,这些研究将探索与其他成人压力指标以及诸如复原力测量等可影响压力的因素的纵向关系。