Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Center for Tuberculosis, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7698. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7698. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
Addressing the social and structural determinants of tuberculosis (TB) through social protection programs is a central feature of global public health policy and disease elimination strategies. However, how best to implement such programs remains unknown. India's direct benefit transfer (DBT) program is the largest cash transfer program in the world dedicated to supporting individuals affected by TB. Despite several studies aimed at evaluating the impact of DBT, many questions remain about its implementation, mechanisms of action, and effectiveness. Dave and Rupani's mixed-methods evaluation of this program previously published in this journal offers valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of the DBT program in improving TB treatment outcomes. Their results also provide an opportunity for demonstrating how systematically collected data may be further analyzed and presented using implementation science, a field of study using methods to promote the systematic uptake of evidence-based interventions to support sustainable program scale-up.
通过社会保护计划解决结核病(TB)的社会和结构性决定因素,是全球公共卫生政策和消除疾病战略的核心特征。然而,如何最好地实施这些计划仍不清楚。印度的直接福利转移(DBT)计划是世界上最大的现金转移计划,专门用于支持受结核病影响的个人。尽管有几项旨在评估 DBT 影响的研究,但关于其实施、作用机制和效果仍存在许多问题。戴夫和鲁帕尼之前在本杂志上发表的这项计划的混合方法评估提供了宝贵的见解,了解 DBT 计划在改善结核病治疗结果方面的优势和局限性。他们的研究结果还提供了一个机会,可以展示如何使用实施科学进一步分析和呈现系统收集的数据,实施科学是一个使用方法来促进基于证据的干预措施的系统采用,以支持可持续的计划扩大规模的研究领域。