The University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Keele University, School of Social, Political and Global Studies and School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele, United Kingdom.
Health Policy. 2023 Oct;136:104889. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104889. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
Despite the renewed interest in Artificial Intelligence-based clinical decision support systems (AI-CDS), there is still a lack of empirical evidence supporting their effectiveness. This underscores the need for rigorous and continuous evaluation and monitoring of processes and outcomes associated with the introduction of health information technology. We illustrate how the emergence of AI-CDS has helped to bring to the fore the critical importance of evaluation principles and action regarding all health information technology applications, as these hitherto have received limited attention. Key aspects include assessment of design, implementation and adoption contexts; ensuring systems support and optimise human performance (which in turn requires understanding clinical and system logics); and ensuring that design of systems prioritises ethics, equity, effectiveness, and outcomes. Going forward, information technology strategy, implementation and assessment need to actively incorporate these dimensions. International policy makers, regulators and strategic decision makers in implementing organisations therefore need to be cognisant of these aspects and incorporate them in decision-making and in prioritising investment. In particular, the emphasis needs to be on stronger and more evidence-based evaluation surrounding system limitations and risks as well as optimisation of outcomes, whilst ensuring learning and contextual review. Otherwise, there is a risk that applications will be sub-optimally embodied in health systems with unintended consequences and without yielding intended benefits.
尽管人们对基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统(AI-CDS)重新产生了兴趣,但仍缺乏支持其有效性的经验证据。这凸显了需要对与引进健康信息技术相关的流程和结果进行严格和持续的评估和监测。我们举例说明了 AI-CDS 的出现如何帮助突显评估原则和针对所有健康信息技术应用的行动的重要性,因为迄今为止,这些应用受到的关注有限。关键方面包括评估设计、实施和采用环境;确保系统支持和优化人员绩效(这反过来又需要了解临床和系统逻辑);并确保系统设计优先考虑道德、公平、有效性和结果。展望未来,信息技术战略、实施和评估需要积极纳入这些方面。因此,国际政策制定者、监管机构和实施组织中的战略决策者需要意识到这些方面,并将其纳入决策和投资优先级制定中。特别是,需要围绕系统限制和风险以及优化结果加强和提供更有力的证据,同时确保学习和环境审查。否则,存在应用程序以不理想的方式体现在卫生系统中,产生意外后果而无法产生预期效益的风险。