• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传达儿童癌症的神经认知影响:让利益相关者参与,以确定研究重点。

Communicating neurocognitive impacts of childhood cancer: Engaging stakeholders to identify research priorities.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins University, School of Education, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Nov;116:107935. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107935. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107935
PMID:37579619
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Supporting childhood cancer survivors with neurocognitive late effects is critical and requires additional attention in the research arena. This convening project's aim was to engage parents, healthcare providers, and education stakeholders in order to identify research priorities regarding patient/family-provider communication about neurocognitive impacts associated with childhood cancer.

METHODS

Specific components of the Stakeholder Engagement in quEstion Development (SEED) method were combined with an online e-Delphi consensus building approach. Multiple modalities were utilized for engagement including in-person/hybrid meetings, email/Zoom/call communications, targeted-asynchronous learning activities by stakeholders, iterative surveys, and hands-on conceptual modeling.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (parents n = 10, educators n = 5, healthcare providers n = 9) participated in the year-long project, generating 8 research questions in the stakeholder priority domains of training families/caregiver, access of neuropsychological assessment, tools to facilitate communication and training medical providers.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper illustrates a successful stakeholder convening process using multi-modal engagement to establish research priorities. The resulting questions can be utilized to guide research projects that will fill gaps to providing optimal care to children with neurocognitive late effects.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This process can be used as a template for tackling other healthcare issues that span across disciplines and domains, where stakeholders have rare opportunities to collaborate.

摘要

目的

支持患有神经认知晚期效应的儿童癌症幸存者至关重要,这在研究领域需要额外的关注。本次专题会议项目旨在让家长、医疗保健提供者和教育利益相关者参与进来,以便确定与儿童癌症相关的神经认知影响的患者/家庭提供者沟通方面的研究重点。

方法

采用利益相关者参与问题开发(SEED)方法的特定组成部分,结合在线电子德尔菲共识建立方法。采用多种方式进行参与,包括面对面/混合会议、电子邮件/Zoom/电话沟通、利益相关者的针对性异步学习活动、迭代调查和实际概念建模。

结果

24 名(家长 n=10、教育者 n=5、医疗保健提供者 n=9)参加了为期一年的项目,在培训家庭/照顾者、神经心理评估的获取、促进沟通和培训医疗提供者的工具等利益相关者优先领域生成了 8 个研究问题。

结论

本文展示了一种使用多模式参与建立研究重点的成功利益相关者召集过程。由此产生的问题可用于指导研究项目,这些项目将填补为患有神经认知晚期效应的儿童提供最佳护理的空白。

实践意义

该过程可作为解决跨越学科和领域的其他医疗保健问题的模板,在这些问题中,利益相关者很少有机会合作。

相似文献

1
Communicating neurocognitive impacts of childhood cancer: Engaging stakeholders to identify research priorities.传达儿童癌症的神经认知影响:让利益相关者参与,以确定研究重点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Nov;116:107935. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107935. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.一项反映社区利益相关者不同观点的肺癌研究议程:SEED方法的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y. eCollection 2019.
3
Supportive mobility devices across the lifespan in Cerebral Palsy: a modified Delphi study to establish stakeholder research priorities.脑瘫患者全生命周期的支持性移动设备:一项用于确定利益相关者研究重点的改良德尔菲研究
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1739-1747. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2233564. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
4
Long-term views on chronic kidney disease research priorities among stakeholders engaged in a priority-setting partnership: A qualitative study.利益相关者参与优先事项设定伙伴关系对慢性肾脏病研究重点的长期看法:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1142-1149. doi: 10.1111/hex.12818. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
5
Are we on the same page? Multiple stakeholders and service users priorities for dementia care and policy: A Delphi study.我们在同一页上吗?痴呆症护理和政策的多方利益相关者和服务用户的优先事项:德尔菲研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Sep;133:104300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104300. Epub 2022 May 28.
6
Priorities for caregiver research in cancer care: an international Delphi survey of caregivers, clinicians, managers, and researchers.癌症护理中照顾者研究的优先事项:照顾者、临床医生、管理人员和研究人员的国际德尔菲调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):805-817. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4314-y. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
7
Engaging Diverse Stakeholders to Improve Therapy Access for Hispanic and Latino Autistic Individuals and Families.吸引不同利益相关者,改善西班牙裔和拉丁裔自闭症患者及其家庭获得治疗的机会。
Am J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar 1;79(2). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2025.050942.
8
A network approach to addressing the needs of patients with incurable head and neck cancer and their families.一种满足无法治愈的头颈癌患者及其家属需求的网络方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Apr 30:1-29. doi: 10.3310/TKLD6486.
9
Development and evaluation of a virtual patient-centered outcomes research training program for the cystic fibrosis community.针对囊性纤维化群体的虚拟以患者为中心的结局研究培训项目的开发与评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 4;7(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00328-4.
10
Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders.优先考虑医疗服务提供模式,以建立更具可持续性的卫生系统:对澳大利亚卫生政策、临床实践和管理、学术和消费者利益相关者的德尔菲研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):425-432. doi: 10.1071/AH20160.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of the Protection of the Rights of Childhood Cancer Survivors to Education Under Special Education Law.《特殊教育法下儿童癌症幸存者受教育权保护的比较分析》
Contin Educ. 2025 Apr 30;6(1):74-90. doi: 10.5334/cie.137. eCollection 2025.