Murmann Maya, Reed Anna Cooper, Scott Mary, Presseau Justin, Heer Carrie, May Kathryn, Ramzy Amy, Huynh Chau N, Skidmore Becky, Welch Vivian, Little Julian, Wilson Kumanan, Brouwers Melissa, Hsu Amy T
Bruyère Research Institute Bruyère Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 13;19(3):e1352. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1352. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Despite the demonstrated efficacy of approved COVID-19 vaccines, high levels of hesitancy were observed in the first few months of the COVID-19 vaccines' rollout. Factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy are well-described in the literature. Among the various strategies for promoting vaccine confidence, educational interventions provide a foundationally and widely implemented set of approaches for supporting individuals in their vaccine decisions. However, the evidence around the measurable impact of various educational strategies to improve vaccine confidence is limited. We conducted a scoping review with the aim of exploring and characterizing educational interventions delivered during the pandemic to support COVID-19 vaccine confidence in adults.
We developed a search strategy with a medical information scientist and searched five databases, including Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science, as well as grey literature. We considered all study designs and reports. Interventions delivered to children or adolescents, interventions on non-COVID-19 vaccines, as well as national or mass vaccination campaigns without documented interaction(s) between facilitator(s) and a specific audience were excluded. Articles were independently screened by three reviewers. After screening 4602 titles and abstracts and 174 full-text articles across two rounds of searches, 22 articles met our inclusion criteria. Ten additional studies were identified through hand searching. Data from included studies were charted and results were described narratively.
We included 32 studies and synthesized their educational delivery structure, participants (i.e., facilitators and priority audience), and content. Formal, group-based presentations were the most common type of educational intervention in the included studies (75%). A third of studies (34%) used multiple strategies, with many formal group-based presentations being coupled with additional individual-based interventions (29%). Given the novelty of the COVID-19 vaccines and the unique current context, studies reported personalized conversations, question periods, and addressing misinformation as important components of the educational approaches reviewed.
Various educational interventions were delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, with many initiatives involving multifaceted interventions utilizing both formal and informal approaches that leveraged community (cultural, religious) partnerships when developing and facilitating COVID-19 vaccine education. Train-the-trainer approaches with recognized community members could be of value as trust and personal connections were identified as strong enablers throughout the review.
尽管已批准的新冠疫苗显示出有效性,但在新冠疫苗推出的最初几个月里,仍有很高比例的人对其持犹豫态度。文献中对导致疫苗犹豫的因素已有充分描述。在提高疫苗信心的各种策略中,教育干预为支持个人做出疫苗决策提供了一系列基础且广泛实施的方法。然而,关于各种教育策略对提高疫苗信心的可衡量影响的证据有限。我们进行了一项范围综述,旨在探索和描述疫情期间为增强成年人对新冠疫苗的信心而开展的教育干预措施。
我们与一位医学信息科学家共同制定了检索策略,并检索了五个数据库,包括Ovid MEDLINE和Web of Science,以及灰色文献。我们考虑了所有研究设计和报告。针对儿童或青少年的干预措施、针对非新冠疫苗的干预措施,以及没有记录促进者与特定受众之间互动的国家或大规模疫苗接种活动均被排除。由三位评审员独立筛选文章。在两轮检索中筛选了4602篇标题和摘要以及174篇全文文章后,有22篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。通过手工检索又确定了10项研究。对纳入研究的数据进行了制表,并对结果进行了叙述性描述。
我们纳入了32项研究,并综合了它们的教育传播结构、参与者(即促进者和重点受众)以及内容。在纳入的研究中,正式的、基于小组的讲座是最常见的教育干预类型(75%)。三分之一的研究(34%)使用了多种策略,许多正式的基于小组的讲座还辅以额外的基于个体的干预措施(29%)。鉴于新冠疫苗的新颖性和当前独特的背景,研究报告称个性化对话、问答环节以及解决错误信息是所审查的教育方法的重要组成部分。
在新冠疫情期间开展了各种教育干预措施,许多举措涉及多方面干预,在制定和促进新冠疫苗教育时利用正式和非正式方法,并借助社区(文化、宗教)伙伴关系。鉴于在整个综述过程中发现信任和个人联系是强有力的推动因素,让受认可的社区成员参与培训培训者的方法可能会有价值。