• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体上美国医生传播的 COVID-19 错误信息。

Communication of COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media by Physicians in the US.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28928.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28928
PMID:37581886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10427940/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Approximately one-third of the more than 1 100 000 confirmed COVID-19-related deaths as of January 18, 2023, were considered preventable if public health recommendations had been followed. Physicians' propagation of misinformation about COVID-19 on social media and other internet-based platforms has raised professional, public health, and ethical concerns.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize (1) the types of COVID-19 misinformation propagated by US physicians after vaccines became available, (2) the online platforms used, and (3) the characteristics of the physicians spreading misinformation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection during the study window to define misinformation, structured searches of high-use social media platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Parler, and YouTube) and news sources (The New York Times, National Public Radio) were conducted to identify COVID-19 misinformation communicated by US-based physicians between January 2021 and December 2022. Physicians' state of licensure and medical specialty were identified. The number of followers for each physician on 4 major platforms was extracted to estimate reach and qualitative content analysis of the messages was performed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcome measures included categories of COVID-19 misinformation propagated, the number and traits of physicians engaged in misinformation propagation, and the type of online media channels used to propagate misinformation and potential reach.

RESULTS

The propagation of COVID-19 misinformation was attributed to 52 physicians in 28 different specialties across all regions of the country. General misinformation categories included vaccines, medication, masks, and other (ie, conspiracy theories). Forty-two physicians (80.8%) posted vaccine misinformation, 40 (76.9%) propagated information in more than 1 category, and 20 (38.5%) posted misinformation on 5 or more platforms. Major themes identified included (1) disputing vaccine safety and effectiveness, (2) promoting medical treatments lacking scientific evidence and/or US Food and Drug Administration approval, (3) disputing mask-wearing effectiveness, and (4) other (unsubstantiated claims, eg, virus origin, government lies, and other conspiracy theories).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this mixed-methods study of US physician propagation of COVID-19 misinformation on social media, results suggest widespread, inaccurate, and potentially harmful assertions made by physicians across the country who represented a range of subspecialties. Further research is needed to assess the extent of the potential harms associated with physician propagation of misinformation, the motivations for these behaviors, and potential legal and professional recourse to improve accountability for misinformation propagation.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af7/10427940/a107f78bfc3a/jamanetwopen-e2328928-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af7/10427940/a107f78bfc3a/jamanetwopen-e2328928-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af7/10427940/a107f78bfc3a/jamanetwopen-e2328928-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性

截至 2023 年 1 月 18 日,在 110 多万例经确认的与 COVID-19 相关的死亡病例中,约有三分之一被认为是可以预防的,如果遵循了公共卫生建议。医生在社交媒体和其他互联网平台上传播与 COVID-19 相关的错误信息,引起了专业、公共卫生和道德方面的关注。

目的

描述(1)在美国医生在疫苗问世后传播的 COVID-19 错误信息的类型,(2)使用的在线平台,以及(3)传播错误信息的医生的特征。

设计、设置和参与者:使用美国疾病控制与预防中心在研究窗口内针对 COVID-19 感染的预防和治疗指南来定义错误信息,对高使用率的社交媒体平台(Twitter、Facebook、Instagram、Parler 和 YouTube)和新闻来源(《纽约时报》、美国国家公共电台)进行了有针对性的搜索,以确定 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间美国医生传播的 COVID-19 错误信息。确定了医生的州执照状态和医疗专业。从 4 个主要平台上提取了每位医生的关注者数量,以估计传播范围,并对信息进行定性内容分析。

主要结果和措施

结果指标包括传播的 COVID-19 错误信息类别、参与错误信息传播的医生数量和特征,以及传播错误信息和潜在传播范围所使用的在线媒体渠道类型。

结果

错误信息的传播归因于全国 28 个不同地区 28 个不同专业的 52 名医生。一般错误信息类别包括疫苗、药物、口罩和其他(即阴谋论)。42 名医生(80.8%)发布了疫苗错误信息,40 名医生(76.9%)发布了超过 1 个类别的信息,20 名医生(38.5%)在 5 个或更多平台上发布了错误信息。确定的主要主题包括(1)质疑疫苗的安全性和有效性,(2)推广缺乏科学证据和/或美国食品和药物管理局批准的治疗方法,(3)质疑口罩的有效性,以及(4)其他(未经证实的说法,例如病毒起源、政府谎言和其他阴谋论)。

结论和相关性

在这项关于美国医生在社交媒体上传播 COVID-19 错误信息的混合方法研究中,结果表明,来自全国各地的代表各种专科的医生发表了广泛、不准确且可能有害的断言。需要进一步研究来评估与医生传播错误信息相关的潜在危害的程度、这些行为的动机,以及潜在的法律和专业追索权,以提高对错误信息传播的问责制。

相似文献

1
Communication of COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media by Physicians in the US.社交媒体上美国医生传播的 COVID-19 错误信息。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28928.
2
Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.社交媒体上的医疗健康相关错误信息:科学文献的文献计量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. doi: 10.2196/28152.
3
Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review.社交媒体上关于 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息:快速综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e37367. doi: 10.2196/37367.
4
One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Longitudinal Study.《推特上一年的 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息:纵向研究》。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 24;25:e42227. doi: 10.2196/42227.
5
Patterns of Media Use, Strength of Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, and the Prevention of COVID-19 From March to July 2020 in the United States: Survey Study.2020 年 3 月至 7 月期间美国的媒体使用模式、对新冠病毒阴谋论的信念强度与新冠病毒的预防:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 27;23(4):e25215. doi: 10.2196/25215.
6
Association Between What People Learned About COVID-19 Using Web Searches and Their Behavior Toward Public Health Guidelines: Empirical Infodemiology Study.人们通过网络搜索了解 COVID-19 与他们对公共卫生指南行为之间的关联:实证信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 2;23(9):e28975. doi: 10.2196/28975.
7
A scoping review of COVID-19 online mis/disinformation in Black communities.一项针对 COVID-19 在线错误/虚假信息在黑人群体中的范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jul 23;12:05026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05026.
8
Impact of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Social Media Virality: Content Analysis of Message Themes and Writing Strategies.社交媒体上 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息的传播影响:信息主题和写作策略的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 6;24(7):e37806. doi: 10.2196/37806.
9
Cross-platform spread: vaccine-related content, sources, and conspiracy theories in YouTube videos shared in early Twitter COVID-19 conversations.跨平台传播:在早期 Twitter COVID-19 对话中分享的 YouTube 视频中的疫苗相关内容、来源和阴谋论。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2003647. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
10
COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence.COVID-19 疫苗谣言和阴谋论:需要进行认知免疫接种以抵制错误信息,提高疫苗接种率。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251605. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' attitudes about RSV vaccination for pregnant women and infants: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey.护士对孕妇和婴儿接种呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗的态度:来自横断面调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0331326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331326. eCollection 2025.
2
U.S. trust in physicians as key public health messengers during the H5N1 avian influenza outbreak.美国在H5N1禽流感疫情期间对医生作为关键公共卫生信息传播者的信任。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 23;15(1):31011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12304-z.
3
Consulting "Dr. Google": how the digital search for internet health information influences doctor-patient relationship.

本文引用的文献

1
A Critical Analysis of the Evidence for the SARS-CoV-2 Origin Hypotheses.对 SARS-CoV-2 起源假说证据的批判性分析。
J Virol. 2023 Apr 27;97(4):e0036523. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00365-23. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
A prescription for the US FDA for the regulation of health misinformation.美国食品药品监督管理局针对健康错误信息监管的一项规定
Nat Med. 2023 Mar;29(3):525-527. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02172-9.
3
Prevalence and Correlates of Long COVID Symptoms Among US Adults.美国成年人长新冠症状的流行率及相关因素。
向“谷歌医生”咨询:通过数字搜索获取网络健康信息如何影响医患关系。
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Aug 8;41(7):e00153623. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN153623. eCollection 2025.
4
Pharmacovigilance in the digital age: gaining insight from social media data.数字时代的药物警戒:从社交媒体数据中获取见解
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2025 May 27;250:10555. doi: 10.3389/ebm.2025.10555. eCollection 2025.
5
Turning analysis into action: opportunities and challenges in implementing wastewater science for public health decision-making.将分析转化为行动:在为公共卫生决策实施废水科学过程中的机遇与挑战。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 21;13:1562659. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1562659. eCollection 2025.
6
Policy stakeholders' perspectives and use of data, research evidence, and misinformation in three counties in California, USA during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020-2022.2020 - 2022年新冠疫情期间美国加利福尼亚州三个县政策利益相关者对数据、研究证据及错误信息的看法与运用
Prev Med Rep. 2025 May 3;54:103098. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103098. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study.主流平台上儿科肺炎相关短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 23;25(1):1896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22963-2.
8
: An online self-management tool for people with long COVID.一款针对长期新冠患者的在线自我管理工具。
Internet Interv. 2025 Apr 4;40:100825. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100825. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
A Critical Juncture for Drug Information and Evidence-Based Voices.药物信息与循证观点的关键节点。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Feb;30(1):143-145. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-30.1.143. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
10
Broadband internet access as a social determinant of health in the early COVID-19 pandemic in U.S. counties.在美国各县新冠疫情早期,宽带互联网接入作为健康的社会决定因素。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jan 3;29:101747. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101747. eCollection 2025 Mar.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238804. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38804.
4
REMOVED: Treatment with Ivermectin Is Associated with Decreased Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: Analysis of a National Federated Database.中文译文:在一项全国性的联合数据库分析中,伊维菌素治疗与 COVID-19 患者死亡率降低相关。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;116S:S40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.096. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Global Prevalence of Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Condition or Long COVID: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.全球新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)后状况或长新冠的流行率:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 1;226(9):1593-1607. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac136.
6
Reducing "COVID-19 Misinformation" While Preserving Free Speech.在保护言论自由的同时减少“新冠疫情虚假信息”
JAMA. 2022 Apr 19;327(15):1443-1444. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.4231.
7
The disaster of misinformation: a review of research in social media.错误信息的灾难:社交媒体研究综述
Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022;13(4):271-285. doi: 10.1007/s41060-022-00311-6. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
When Physicians Spread Unscientific Information About COVID-19.当医生传播关于新冠病毒的不科学信息时。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 8;327(10):904-906. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1083.
9
The vaccinated proportion of people with COVID-19 needs context.新冠病毒感染者的疫苗接种比例需要结合具体情况来看。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):627. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02837-3.
10
Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States.美国在应对新冠疫情方面的政治两极分化。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Sep;179:110892. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892. Epub 2021 Apr 1.