Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 16;18(8):e0289647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289647. eCollection 2023.
Compared to the previous cytology-based program, the introduction of primary high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) based screening in 2017 has led to an increased number of referrals. To counter this, triage of hrHPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening can potentially be optimized by taking sociodemographic and lifestyle risk factors for cervical abnormalities into account. Therefore, it is essential to gain knowledge of the views of women (30-60 years) eligible for cervical cancer screening.
The main goal of this qualitative study was to gain insight in the aspects that influence acceptability of risk-based triage in cervical cancer screening.
A focus group study in which participants were recruited via four general medical practices, and purposive sampling was used to maximize heterogeneity with regards to age, education level, and cervical cancer screening experiences.
The focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
A total of 28 women (average age: 45.2 years) eligible for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands participated in seven online focus group discussions. Half of the participants was higher educated, and the participants differed in previous cervical cancer screening participation and screening result.
In total, 5 main themes and 17 subthemes were identified that determine the acceptability of risk-stratified triage. The main themes are: 1) adequacy of the screening program: an evidence-based program that is able to minimize cancer incidence and reduce unnecessary referrals; 2) personal information (e.g., sensitive topics and stigma); 3) emotional impact: fear and reassurance; 4) communication (e.g., transparency); and 5) autonomy (e.g., prevention).
The current study highlights several challenges regarding the development and implementation of risk-based triage that need attention in order to be accepted by the target group. These challenges include dealing with sensitive topics and a transparent communication strategy.
与之前基于细胞学的方案相比,2017 年引入的主要高危型人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)筛查导致转诊人数增加。为了解决这个问题,在宫颈癌筛查中对 hrHPV 阳性的女性进行分流,可以考虑纳入与宫颈癌异常相关的社会人口学和生活方式危险因素,从而优化其方案。因此,了解有资格进行宫颈癌筛查的女性(30-60 岁)的观点至关重要。
本定性研究的主要目的是深入了解影响宫颈癌筛查中基于风险的分流可接受性的因素。
本研究采用焦点小组研究,通过四家普通医疗诊所招募参与者,采用目的性抽样,最大限度地提高年龄、教育水平和宫颈癌筛查经验方面的异质性。
对焦点小组讨论进行逐字转录,并使用反思性主题分析进行分析。
共有 28 名符合荷兰宫颈癌筛查条件的女性(平均年龄:45.2 岁)参加了 7 次在线焦点小组讨论。其中一半参与者受过高等教育,在以前的宫颈癌筛查参与情况和筛查结果方面存在差异。
共确定了 5 个主要主题和 17 个次主题,这些主题决定了风险分层分流的可接受性。主要主题包括:1)筛查计划的充分性:基于证据的计划,能够最大限度地减少癌症发病率和减少不必要的转诊;2)个人信息(如敏感话题和耻辱感);3)情绪影响:恐惧和安心;4)沟通(如透明度);5)自主权(如预防)。
本研究强调了在开发和实施基于风险的分流时需要关注的一些挑战,以使其被目标群体接受。这些挑战包括处理敏感话题和透明的沟通策略。