Tinits Peeter, Sobchuk Oleg
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
School of Humanities, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 May 7;2:e26. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.21. eCollection 2020.
Are there large-scale trends in art history that surpass individual creativity or relatively short artistic movements? Many theories describe art history as a process similar to a change of fashions, while others suggest that art can be progressive - getting better, in some sense, over time. We approach this question anew with the theory of cumulative cultural evolution, which describes cultural accomplishments in terms of innovations that are maintained across generations and accumulated to support ever greater creative potential. In this paper, we empirically test the possibility for cumulative evolution in the techniques used to make an artistic product. Specifically, we measure the size and structure of the production crews in American films in 1910-2010 based on a dataset of 1000 popular films across the century. We find that film crews become exponentially more complex, with a growing set of core jobs, and more innovative in creating new jobs in filmmaking. Our study shows that art history can be cumulative, showing the progressive maintenance of innovative techniques, and thus providing an alternative to the widespread view of art history as a mere fluctuation of trends and fashions.
艺术史上是否存在超越个人创造力或相对短暂艺术运动的大规模趋势?许多理论将艺术史描述为一个类似于时尚变化的过程,而另一些理论则认为艺术可以是进步的——从某种意义上说,随着时间的推移会变得更好。我们用累积文化进化理论重新审视这个问题,该理论根据跨代维持并积累以支持不断增长的创作潜力的创新来描述文化成就。在本文中,我们通过实证检验了制作艺术作品所使用的技术中累积进化的可能性。具体来说,我们基于一个涵盖整个世纪的1000部热门电影的数据集,测量了1910年至2010年美国电影制作团队的规模和结构。我们发现电影制作团队呈指数级变得更加复杂,核心工作岗位不断增加,并且在电影制作中创造新工作岗位方面更具创新性。我们的研究表明,艺术史可以是累积性的,展示了创新技术的逐步维持,从而为将艺术史仅仅视为趋势和时尚的波动这一普遍观点提供了一种替代观点。