• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国青少年早期道德直觉中基于年龄和性别的差异。

Age- and sex-based differences in the moral intuitions of American early adolescents.

作者信息

Bretl Brandon L, Goering Marlon

机构信息

University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Jul 27;4:e33. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.34. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1017/ehs.2022.34
PMID:37588913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10426028/
Abstract

This study sought to explore the validity of a latent-factor model of moral intuition development during early adolescence. The 3-Factor Character Foundations Survey (CFS-3) was used to assess the moral intuitions of early adolescents ( = 850, mean = 12.4 years old, SD = 0.96) under a moral foundations theory framework. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the psychometric validity of the three latent factor constructs (autonomy, loyalty and empathy), and partial metric invariance was established to allow for the comparison of latent factor means between four age- and sex-based groups coinciding with averages for pubertal onset. Results support prior findings of greater latent factor means for females in all three factors when compared with males in the 11-12-year-old age group. Additionally, 13-14-year-old females exhibited lower latent factor means in autonomy and loyalty factors when compared with 11-12-year-old females. This resulted in 13-14-year-old females remaining higher in empathy and autonomy but showing no difference in loyalty when compared with 13-14-year-old males. The results are interpreted through the lens of attachment theory, socio-cultural influence and certain limitations of the survey instrument itself. Suggestions for future studies are proposed.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨青春期早期道德直觉发展的潜在因素模型的有效性。在道德基础理论框架下,使用三因素性格基础调查(CFS - 3)来评估青春期早期青少年(n = 850,平均年龄 = 12.4岁,标准差 = 0.96)的道德直觉。验证性因素分析支持了三个潜在因素结构(自主性、忠诚和同理心)的心理测量效度,并建立了部分度量不变性,以便比较与青春期开始平均水平相符的四个年龄和性别组之间的潜在因素均值。结果支持了先前的研究发现,即在11 - 12岁年龄组中,与男性相比,女性在所有三个因素中的潜在因素均值更高。此外,与11 - 12岁的女性相比,13 - 14岁的女性在自主性和忠诚因素上的潜在因素均值较低。这导致13 - 14岁的女性在同理心和自主性方面仍然高于13 - 14岁的男性,但在忠诚方面没有差异。研究结果通过依恋理论、社会文化影响以及调查工具本身的某些局限性进行了解释。并提出了对未来研究的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/8ec29f5540a6/S2513843X22000342_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/1f4a86f09b50/S2513843X22000342_figAb.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/b28c67365776/S2513843X22000342_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/f08cf36c7b03/S2513843X22000342_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/8ec29f5540a6/S2513843X22000342_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/1f4a86f09b50/S2513843X22000342_figAb.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/b28c67365776/S2513843X22000342_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/f08cf36c7b03/S2513843X22000342_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b150/10426028/8ec29f5540a6/S2513843X22000342_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Age- and sex-based differences in the moral intuitions of American early adolescents.美国青少年早期道德直觉中基于年龄和性别的差异。
Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Jul 27;4:e33. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.34. eCollection 2022.
2
Mapping the moral domain.绘制道德领域图谱。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366-85. doi: 10.1037/a0021847.
3
Project on the Good Physician: A Proposal for a Moral Intuitionist Model of Virtuous Caring.“良医”项目:关于道德直觉主义的美德关怀模型的一项提议
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):75-84. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1205497. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
4
Do moral intuitions influence judges' sentencing decisions? A multilevel study of criminal court sentencing in Pennsylvania.道德直觉是否会影响法官的量刑决策?宾夕法尼亚州刑事法庭量刑的多层次研究。
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Sep;115:102927. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102927. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
5
Measurement Invariance of Moral Foundations across Population Strata.道德基础在不同人群阶层中的测量不变性。
J Pers Assess. 2023 Mar-Apr;105(2):163-173. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2074853. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.自由主义者和保守主义者依赖不同的道德基础。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1029-46. doi: 10.1037/a0015141.
7
Moral foundations in autistic people and people with systemizing minds.自闭症患者和系统思维者的道德基础。
Mol Autism. 2024 May 14;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00591-8.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) in 15-16 Years Old Norwegian Adolescents.15至16岁挪威青少年的感知压力问卷(PSQ)的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 1;9:1850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01850. eCollection 2018.
9
Moral "foundations" as the product of motivated social cognition: Empathy and other psychological underpinnings of ideological divergence in "individualizing" and "binding" concerns.道德“基础”是动机社会认知的产物:同理心和其他心理基础是“个体化”和“约束”关注的思想分歧。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241144. eCollection 2020.
10
The Shame and Guilt Scales of the Test of Self-Conscious Affect-Adolescent (TOSCA-A): Factor Structure, Concurrent and Discriminant Validity, and Measurement and Structural Invariance Across Ratings of Males and Females.青少年自我意识情感测试(TOSCA-A)的羞耻和内疚量表:因素结构、同时效度和区分效度,以及男性和女性评分的测量与结构不变性
Assessment. 2017 Jun;24(4):517-527. doi: 10.1177/1073191115608942. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Perceived Physical Attractiveness and Moral Intuitions as Mediators Between Somatic-Parental Effort and Mating Orientation.自我认知的身体吸引力和道德直觉作为躯体-亲代投入与交配取向之间的中介因素
Evol Psychol. 2025 Jul-Sep;23(3):14747049251349052. doi: 10.1177/14747049251349052. Epub 2025 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural group selection and human cooperation: a conceptual and empirical review.文化群体选择与人类合作:概念与实证综述
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Feb 7;2:e2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Sex and gender differences in the development of empathy.共情发展中的性别差异。
J Neurosci Res. 2023 May;101(5):718-729. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25009. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
3
Empathy as a Mediator of the Relationship between Authoritative Parenting and Delinquent Behavior in Adolescence.同理心在权威型父母教养方式与青少年犯罪行为关系中的中介作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Jul;50(7):1308-1318. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01445-9. Epub 2021 May 15.
4
Moral Reasoning Enables Developmental and Societal Change.道德推理促进发展和社会变革。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;16(6):1209-1225. doi: 10.1177/1745691620964076. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
Affective reactivity during adolescence: Associations with age, puberty and testosterone.青少年时期的情感反应:与年龄、青春期和睾酮的关系。
Cortex. 2019 Aug;117:336-350. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 May 17.
6
Understanding the Role of Puberty in Structural and Functional Development of the Adolescent Brain.理解青春期在青少年大脑结构和功能发育中的作用。
J Res Adolesc. 2019 Mar;29(1):32-53. doi: 10.1111/jora.12408.
7
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
8
Adolescent psychosocial development: A review of longitudinal models and research.青少年心理社会发展:纵向模型与研究综述
Dev Psychol. 2016 Dec;52(12):1969-1993. doi: 10.1037/dev0000243.
9
Development and Lability in the Parent-Child Relationship During Adolescence: Associations With Pubertal Timing and Tempo.青春期亲子关系的发展与易变性:与青春期时间和节奏的关联
J Res Adolesc. 2015 Sep;25(3):474-489. doi: 10.1111/jora.12139.
10
Moral foundations vignettes: a standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory.道德基础短文:基于道德基础理论的情景标准化刺激数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1178-1198. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2.