Suppr超能文献

使用三种不同的地形图设备测量瞳孔直径的可重复性。

Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices.

作者信息

Saad Amr, Steinberg Johannes, Frings Andreas

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 18;18(8):e0290417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290417. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intra- and inter-device repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different devices in patients prior to corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

We examined preoperative measurements from a total of 204 eyes (102 patients) scheduled for corneal refractive surgery at two private centers between July and December 2021. Three consecutive scans were performed with three different devices (Sirius anterior segment analyzer, Pentacam HR, IOLMaster 500) in the same session by the same examiner under standardized conditions. To assess the intra- and inter-device repeatability, we calculated the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and demonstrated results using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

The measurement accuracy (intra-device repeatability) of Sirius and IOLMaster was comparable (ICC = 0.64 and 0.61, respectively), with almost no statistically significant differences. Sirius showed the highest measurement accuracy among the three devices. Pentacam measurements resulted in lower precision, with an ICC of 0.09. The agreement between the pairs of devices (inter-device repeatability) was low (wide LoA ranges, Table 5).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the intra-device repeatability of Sirius and IOLMaster was higher than that of the Pentacam, although it did not achieve an optimal level across all three devices. The three devices examined cannot be used interchangeably.

摘要

目的

评估在角膜屈光手术前使用三种不同设备测量患者瞳孔直径的设备内和设备间重复性。

方法

我们检查了2021年7月至12月期间在两个私人中心计划进行角膜屈光手术的总共204只眼(102名患者)的术前测量数据。在标准化条件下,由同一名检查者在同一时段使用三种不同设备(Sirius眼前节分析仪、Pentacam HR、IOLMaster 500)进行连续三次扫描。为了评估设备内和设备间重复性,我们计算了组内相关系数(ICC),并使用Bland-Altman图展示结果。

结果

Sirius和IOLMaster的测量准确性(设备内重复性)相当(ICC分别为0.64和0.61),几乎没有统计学上的显著差异。Sirius在三种设备中显示出最高的测量准确性。Pentacam测量的精度较低,ICC为0.09。设备对之间的一致性(设备间重复性)较低(一致性界限范围宽,表5)。

结论

在本研究中,Sirius和IOLMaster的设备内重复性高于Pentacam,尽管在所有三种设备中均未达到最佳水平。所检查的三种设备不能互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/578b/10437858/215735ee6033/pone.0290417.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验