Suppr超能文献

比较肠杆菌科临床分离株在多个测序平台和检测方法中的抗微生物药物耐药基因和表型。

Comparing antimicrobial resistant genes and phenotypes across multiple sequencing platforms and assays for Enterobacterales clinical isolates.

机构信息

BioInfoExperts LLC, 718 Bayou Lane, Thibodaux, LA, 70301, USA.

FoxSeq, LLC, Thibodaux, LA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02975-x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of bacterial isolates can be used to identify antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. Previous studies have shown that genotype-based AMR has variable accuracy for predicting carbapenem resistance in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE); however, the majority of these studies used short-read platforms (e.g. Illumina) to generate sequence data. In this study, our objective was to determine whether Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read WGS would improve detection of carbapenem AMR genes with respect to short-read only WGS for nine clinical CRE samples. We measured the minimum inhibitory breakpoint (MIC) using two phenotype assays (MicroScan and ETEST) for six antibiotics, including two carbapenems (meropenem and ertapenem) and four non-carbapenems (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, cefepime, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). We generated short-read data using the Illumina NextSeq and long-read data using the ONT MinION. Four assembly methods were compared: ONT-only assembly; ONT-only assembly plus short-read polish; ONT + short-read hybrid assembly plus short-read polish; short-read only assembly.

RESULTS

Consistent with previous studies, our results suggest that the hybrid assembly produced the highest quality results as measured by gene completeness and contig circularization. However, ONT-only methods had minimal impact on the detection of AMR genes and plasmids compared to short-read methods, although, notably, differences in gene copy number differed between methods. All four assembly methods showed identical presence/absence of the blaKPC-2 carbapenemase gene for all samples. The two phenotype assays showed 100% concordant results for the non-carbapenems, but only 65% concordance for the two carbapenems. The presence/absence of AMR genes was 100% concordant with AMR phenotypes for all four non-carbapenem drugs, although only 22%-50% sensitivity for the carbapenems.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these findings suggest that the lack of complete correspondence between CRE AMR genotype and phenotype for carbapenems, while concerning, is independent of sequencing platform/assembly method.

摘要

简介

对细菌分离株进行全基因组测序(WGS)可用于鉴定抗菌药物耐药(AMR)基因。先前的研究表明,基于基因型的 AMR 对预测碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)中的碳青霉烯类耐药的准确性存在差异;然而,这些研究中的大多数都使用短读长平台(例如 Illumina)来生成序列数据。在这项研究中,我们的目标是确定牛津纳米孔技术(ONT)长读长 WGS 是否会提高对 9 例临床 CRE 样本中碳青霉烯类 AMR 基因的检测准确性,方法是将其与仅短读长 WGS 进行比较。我们使用两种表型测定法(MicroScan 和 ETEST)测量了六种抗生素的最小抑菌折点(MIC),其中包括两种碳青霉烯类(美罗培南和厄他培南)和四种非碳青霉烯类(庆大霉素、环丙沙星、头孢吡肟和复方磺胺甲噁唑)。我们使用 Illumina NextSeq 生成短读长数据,使用 ONT MinION 生成长读长数据。比较了四种组装方法:仅 ONT 组装;仅 ONT 组装加短读长补全;ONT+短读长混合组装加短读长补全;仅短读长组装。

结果

与先前的研究一致,我们的结果表明,混合组装在基因完整性和环化率方面产生了最高质量的结果。然而,与短读长方法相比,ONT 仅方法对 AMR 基因和质粒的检测影响很小,尽管值得注意的是,方法之间的基因拷贝数存在差异。所有四种组装方法均显示所有样本 blaKPC-2 碳青霉烯酶基因的存在/缺失情况完全一致。两种表型测定法对非碳青霉烯类药物均显示出 100%的一致性结果,而对两种碳青霉烯类药物的一致性仅为 65%。四种非碳青霉烯类药物的 AMR 基因的存在/缺失情况与 AMR 表型完全一致,而碳青霉烯类药物的敏感性仅为 22%-50%。

结论

总体而言,这些发现表明,碳青霉烯类 CRE AMR 基因型与表型之间缺乏完全对应关系虽然令人担忧,但与测序平台/组装方法无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4ce/10436404/2d39fdc109e2/12866_2023_2975_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验