• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medical volume segmentation by overfitting sparsely annotated data.通过过度拟合稀疏标注数据进行医学体积分割。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Jul;10(4):044007. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.4.044007. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
2
Light mixed-supervised segmentation for 3D medical image data.基于混合监督的 3D 医学图像数据分割。
Med Phys. 2024 Jan;51(1):167-178. doi: 10.1002/mp.16816. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
3
Collaborative Learning for Annotation-Efficient Volumetric MR Image Segmentation.基于协同学习的高效标注磁共振容积图像分割。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Oct;60(4):1604-1614. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29194. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
4
3D-BoxSup: Positive-Unlabeled Learning of Brain Tumor Segmentation Networks From 3D Bounding Boxes.3D-BoxSup:基于3D边界框的脑肿瘤分割网络的正样本-无标签学习
Front Neurosci. 2020 Apr 28;14:350. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00350. eCollection 2020.
5
URCA: Uncertainty-based region clipping algorithm for semi-supervised medical image segmentation.基于不确定性的区域裁剪算法在半监督医学图像分割中的应用。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Sep;254:108278. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108278. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
6
An Annotation Sparsification Strategy for 3D Medical Image Segmentation via Representative Selection and Self-Training.一种基于代表性选择和自训练的3D医学图像分割的注释稀疏化策略
Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2020 Feb;34(44):6925-6932. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.6175. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
PLN: Parasitic-Like Network for Barely Supervised Medical Image Segmentation.PLN:用于弱监督医学图像分割的类寄生网络
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2023 Mar;42(3):582-593. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3211188. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
8
Hepatic and portal vein segmentation with dual-stream deep neural network.基于双流深度神经网络的肝脏及门静脉分割。
Med Phys. 2024 Aug;51(8):5441-5456. doi: 10.1002/mp.17090. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
9
Self-supervised-RCNN for medical image segmentation with limited data annotation.用于医学图像分割的具有有限数据标注的自监督区域卷积神经网络
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2023 Oct;109:102297. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102297. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
10
A 2.5D Self-Training Strategy for Carotid Artery Segmentation in T1-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Images.一种用于T1加权脑磁共振图像中颈动脉分割的2.5D自训练策略
J Imaging. 2024 Jul 3;10(7):161. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10070161.

本文引用的文献

1
The Medical Segmentation Decathlon.医学分割十项全能
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 15;13(1):4128. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30695-9.
2
Annotation-efficient deep learning for automatic medical image segmentation.基于注解高效的深度学习的医学影像自动分割
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 8;12(1):5915. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26216-9.
3
AbdomenCT-1K: Is Abdominal Organ Segmentation a Solved Problem?腹部 CT-1K:腹部器官分割是否已经解决?
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2022 Oct;44(10):6695-6714. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3100536. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Label cleaning and propagation for improved segmentation performance using fully convolutional networks.基于全卷积网络的标签清洗和传播以提高分割性能。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Mar;16(3):349-361. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02312-5. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
On the usage of average Hausdorff distance for segmentation performance assessment: hidden error when used for ranking.平均 Hausdorff 距离在分割性能评估中的应用:用于排序时的隐藏错误。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2021 Jan 21;5(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41747-020-00200-2.
6
An Annotation Sparsification Strategy for 3D Medical Image Segmentation via Representative Selection and Self-Training.一种基于代表性选择和自训练的3D医学图像分割的注释稀疏化策略
Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2020 Feb;34(44):6925-6932. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.6175. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation.拥抱不完美数据集:医学图像分割深度学习解决方案综述。
Med Image Anal. 2020 Jul;63:101693. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101693. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
8
Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias-variance trade-off.调和现代机器学习实践与经典偏差-方差权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 6;116(32):15849-15854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903070116. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.深度学习在医学图像分析中的应用研究综述。
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
10
Reverse Classification Accuracy: Predicting Segmentation Performance in the Absence of Ground Truth.反向分类准确率:在缺乏真实数据的情况下预测分割性能。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Aug;36(8):1597-1606. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2665165. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

通过过度拟合稀疏标注数据进行医学体积分割。

Medical volume segmentation by overfitting sparsely annotated data.

作者信息

Payer Tristan, Nizamani Faraz, Beer Meinrad, Götz Michael, Ropinski Timo

机构信息

Ulm University, Institute of Media Informatics, Visual Computing Group, Ulm, Germany.

University Hospital Ulm, Radiology Department, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Jul;10(4):044007. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.4.044007. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.10.4.044007
PMID:37600751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10434268/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Semantic segmentation is one of the most significant tasks in medical image computing, whereby deep neural networks have shown great success. Unfortunately, supervised approaches are very data-intensive, and obtaining reliable annotations is time-consuming and expensive. Sparsely labeled approaches, such as bounding boxes, have shown some success in reducing the annotation time. However, in 3D volume data, each slice must still be manually labeled.

APPROACH

We evaluate approaches that reduce the annotation effort by reducing the number of slices that need to be labeled in a 3D volume. In a two-step process, a similarity metric is used to select slices that should be annotated by a trained radiologist. In the second step, a predictor is used to predict the segmentation mask for the rest of the slices. We evaluate different combinations of selectors and predictors on medical CT and MRI volumes. Thus we can determine that combination works best, and how far slice annotations can be reduced.

RESULTS

Our results show that for instance for the Medical Segmentation Decathlon-heart dataset, some selector, and predictor combinations allow for a Dice score 0.969 when only annotating 20% of slices per volume. Experiments on other datasets show a similarly positive trend.

CONCLUSIONS

We evaluate a method that supports experts during the labeling of 3D medical volumes. Our approach makes it possible to drastically reduce the number of slices that need to be manually labeled. We present a recommendation in which selector predictor combination to use for different tasks and goals.

摘要

目的

语义分割是医学图像计算中最重要的任务之一,深度神经网络在这方面已取得巨大成功。不幸的是,监督方法对数据要求很高,获取可靠的标注既耗时又昂贵。稀疏标注方法,如边界框,在减少标注时间方面已取得一些成效。然而,在三维体数据中,每一层切片仍需手动标注。

方法

我们评估了通过减少三维体中需要标注的切片数量来降低标注工作量的方法。在一个两步过程中,使用相似性度量来选择应由训练有素的放射科医生标注的切片。在第二步中,使用预测器为其余切片预测分割掩码。我们在医学CT和MRI体数据上评估了选择器和预测器的不同组合。由此我们可以确定哪种组合效果最佳,以及切片标注可以减少到何种程度。

结果

我们的结果表明,例如对于医学分割十项全能心脏数据集,某些选择器和预测器组合在每个体积仅标注20%的切片时,Dice分数可达0.969。在其他数据集上的实验也显示出类似的积极趋势。

结论

我们评估了一种在三维医学体数据标注过程中为专家提供支持的方法。我们的方法能够大幅减少需要手动标注的切片数量。我们针对不同任务和目标给出了使用哪种选择器-预测器组合的建议。