• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜腹疝修补术中腹膜桥接与不缝合的比较:一项随机对照试验

Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Ali Fathalla, Sandblom Gabriel, Forgo Bianka, Wallin Göran

机构信息

From the Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Department of Surgery, Karlskoga Hospital, Karlskoga, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Surg Open. 2023 Feb 2;4(1):e257. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000257. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000257
PMID:37600866
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10431530/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative seroma and pain are common problems following laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair of ventral hernias. These adverse outcomes may be avoided by dissecting and using the peritoneum in the hernial sac to bridge the hernia defect.

METHODS

This was a patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, parallel-design, randomized controlled trial comparing nonclosure and peritoneal bridging approaches in patients scheduled for elective midline ventral hernia repair. The primary endpoint was seroma volume on ultrasonography. The secondary endpoints were postoperative pain, recurrence, and complications.

RESULTS

Between November 2018 and December 2020, 112 patients were randomized, of whom 60 were in the nonclosure group and 52 were in the peritoneal bridging group. The seroma volume in the nonclosure and peritoneal bridging groups were 17 cm (6-53 cm) versus 0 cm (0-26 cm) at 1-month follow-up ( = 0.013). The median volume was zero at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in both groups. No significant differences were observed in early postoperative pain ( = 0.447) and in recurrence rate ( = 0.684). There were 4 (7%) and 1 (2%) perioperative complications that lead to reoperations in simple IPOM (sIPOM) and IPOM with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Seroma was less prevalent after IPOM-pb at 1-month follow-up compared with sIPOM, with similar postoperative pain 1 week after index surgery in both groups. At subsequent follow-ups, the differences in seroma were not statistically significant. Further studies are required to confirm these results. Trial registration (NCT04229940).

摘要

引言

腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入修补术(IPOM)治疗腹疝后,术后血清肿和疼痛是常见问题。通过在疝囊内解剖并使用腹膜来桥接疝缺损,可避免这些不良后果。

方法

这是一项患者及结果评估者双盲、平行设计、随机对照试验,比较择期中线腹疝修补患者的不闭合和腹膜桥接两种方法。主要终点是超声检查的血清肿体积。次要终点是术后疼痛、复发和并发症。

结果

2018年11月至2020年12月,112例患者被随机分组,其中60例在不闭合组,52例在腹膜桥接组。1个月随访时,不闭合组和腹膜桥接组的血清肿体积分别为17 cm(6 - 53 cm)和0 cm(0 - 26 cm)(P = 0.013)。两组在3个月、6个月和12个月随访时的血清肿体积中位数均为零。术后早期疼痛(P = 0.447)和复发率(P = 0.684)无显著差异。单纯IPOM(sIPOM)和腹膜桥接IPOM(IPOM - pb)分别有4例(7%)和1例(2%)围手术期并发症导致再次手术。

结论

与sIPOM相比,IPOM - pb术后1个月随访时血清肿发生率较低,两组在初次手术后1周的术后疼痛相似。在随后的随访中,血清肿差异无统计学意义。需要进一步研究来证实这些结果。试验注册号(NCT04229940)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/de1d70eafb85/as9-4-e257-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/b1e87401ede5/as9-4-e257-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/8da4ffe76f39/as9-4-e257-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/366d977d6d0e/as9-4-e257-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/de1d70eafb85/as9-4-e257-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/b1e87401ede5/as9-4-e257-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/8da4ffe76f39/as9-4-e257-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/366d977d6d0e/as9-4-e257-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a4/10431530/de1d70eafb85/as9-4-e257-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜腹疝修补术中腹膜桥接与不缝合的比较:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Feb 2;4(1):e257. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000257. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.使用带腹膜桥接的腹腔内置片修补术进行腹腔镜腹侧和切口疝修补术
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?对于腹腔镜修补大型切口疝,采用腹腔内置入补片并封闭筋膜缺损的方法是否优于标准的腹腔内置入补片法?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/ases.12471. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
4
Peritoneal bridging versus fascial closure in laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay ventral hernia mesh repair: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术治疗腹外疝中腹膜桥接与筋膜闭合的比较:一项随机临床试验。
BJS Open. 2020 Aug;4(4):587-592. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50305. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)联合筋膜修复术(IPOM-plus)治疗腹疝和切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):385-400. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
6
Outcomes of bridging versus mesh augmentation in laparoscopic repair of small and medium midline ventral hernias.腹腔镜修补中小尺寸中线腹疝时桥接与补片增强的效果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):382-388. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4984-9. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
7
Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内补片加强(IPOM plus)治疗腹壁疝的比较分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
8
Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术中筋膜缺损的闭合与非闭合:文献综述
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):764-73. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
9
Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias.与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片修补术(IPOM)治疗中小尺寸腹外疝相比,机器人辅助腹直肌后入路疝修补术(rRetrorectus)术后疼痛更少,住院时间更短。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09608-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
Electric cauterization of the hernia sac in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reduces the incidence of postoperative seroma: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术中对疝囊进行电灼可降低术后血清肿的发生率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):747-750. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1790-4. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.使用带腹膜桥接的腹腔内置片修补术进行腹腔镜腹侧和切口疝修补术
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
Peritoneal bridging versus fascial closure in laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay ventral hernia mesh repair: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术治疗腹外疝中腹膜桥接与筋膜闭合的比较:一项随机临床试验。
BJS Open. 2020 Aug;4(4):587-592. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50305. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial.
腹腔镜脐疝修补术中筋膜缺损的关闭:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):200-208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11490.
4
Seroma prevention strategies in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review.腹腔镜腹外疝修补术中预防血清肿的策略:系统评价。
Hernia. 2020 Aug;24(4):717-731. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02098-1. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
5
Electric cauterization of the hernia sac in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reduces the incidence of postoperative seroma: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术中对疝囊进行电灼可降低术后血清肿的发生率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):747-750. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1790-4. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
6
Assessing the GRIP of Ventral Hernia Repair: How to Securely Fasten DIS Classified Meshes.评估腹疝修补术的抓持力:如何牢固固定DIS分类补片。
Front Surg. 2018 Jan 19;4:78. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00078. eCollection 2017.
7
The Impact of Body Mass Index on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: A Comparative Study.体重指数对腹壁重建结果的影响:一项比较研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1234-1244. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003264.
8
Defects and donuts: the importance of the mesh:defect area ratio.缺损与“甜甜圈”:网片与缺损面积比的重要性。
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):893-895. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1524-4. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
9
Proposal of ecographic classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后血清肿的超声图像分类建议
J Ultrasound. 2014 Nov 7;18(4):349-60. doi: 10.1007/s40477-014-0143-0. eCollection 2015 Dec.
10
Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术中筋膜缺损的闭合与非闭合:文献综述
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):764-73. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y. Epub 2015 Jul 22.