• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估腹疝修补术的抓持力:如何牢固固定DIS分类补片。

Assessing the GRIP of Ventral Hernia Repair: How to Securely Fasten DIS Classified Meshes.

作者信息

Kallinowski Friedrich, Harder F, Gutjahr D, Raschidi R, Silva T G, Vollmer M, Nessel Regine

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Institut für Biomechanik, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2018 Jan 19;4:78. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00078. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2017.00078
PMID:29404336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5780431/
Abstract

Recurrences are frequently observed after ventral hernia repair. Based on clinical data, the mesh-defect area ratio (MDAR) can lead to lower recurrence rates. Using dynamic intermittent strain (DIS) in a pig tissue model, MDAR can be modified to give a measure called grip to better assess the mechanical stability of ventral hernia repair. The focus of this experimental study is to assess the different aspects of mesh overlap (OL) and fixation only in bridging repair of ventral hernias. DIS mimics coughing actions in an model with the repetition of submaximal impacts delivered a hydraulically driven plastic containment. Tissue derived from pig bellies simulates a ventral hernia with varying defect sizes. MDAR is calculated from the hernia orifice and the mesh OL. Commercially available meshes were strengthened with glue, tacks, and sutures to bridge the defects. The reconstructions are strained with up to 425 dynamic impacts. The grip of each repair is assessed using MDAR modified by the strength of the fixation. The DIS classification is based on bridging of a 5 cm ventral hernia orifice with an OL of 5 cm in a sublay position. The classification discriminates meshes properties upon DIS strain. MDAR is calculated to be 9 under these conditions. Decreasing the OL or increasing the hernia orifice reduces MDAR to numbers below 9. MDAR is modified to reach GRIP. Closure of the peritoneum adds about 4 to the grip given by MDAR. The multiplying factor of a transmural suture or one tack of Securestrap or Protack is 0.5 times the number of tacks applied. The multiplier given by a bonding spot of Glubran is similar to that of an Absorbatack being 0.33. Plotting the likelihood of a bridging repair to survive more than 400 DIS impacts versus the grip estimated from the factors given above, the grip to be passed for a durable repair is 10 for Parietex Progrip, and Dynamesh Cicat and 25 for Dynamesh IPOM. Clinical data previously published can be reculculated to assess MDAR and permit an estimation of the grip of the reconstruction. In these recalculations, a correlation between MDAR and long-term recurrence rates is found. A dimensionless number called grip can be calculated. The grip can be modified by fixation in a reproducible way. A higher grip can improve the durability of ventral hernia repair. We believe that a higher grip leads to lower recurrence rates in the clinical setting.

摘要

腹疝修补术后复发情况屡见不鲜。根据临床数据,网片缺损面积比(MDAR)可降低复发率。在猪组织模型中使用动态间歇性应变(DIS),可对MDAR进行修正,得出一种名为抓地力的测量指标,以更好地评估腹疝修补术的机械稳定性。本实验研究的重点是仅在腹疝的桥接修补中评估网片重叠(OL)和固定的不同方面。DIS在一个模型中模拟咳嗽动作,通过液压驱动的塑料容器重复施加次最大冲击力。取自猪腹部的组织模拟不同大小缺损的腹疝。MDAR由疝孔和网片OL计算得出。使用胶水、钉和缝线加强市售网片以桥接缺损。重建后的组织承受多达425次动态冲击。使用经固定强度修正的MDAR评估每次修补的抓地力。DIS分类基于在腹膜前位置用5厘米的OL桥接5厘米的腹疝孔。该分类可区分DIS应变时网片的特性。在这些条件下计算得出MDAR为9。减小OL或增大疝孔会使MDAR降至9以下。对MDAR进行修正以得出抓地力。缝合腹膜可使MDAR给出的抓地力增加约4。透壁缝线或一根Securestrap或Protack钉的倍增系数是所用钉数量的0.5倍。Glubran粘结点给出的倍增系数与Absorbatack的相似,为0.33。绘制桥接修补在超过400次DIS冲击下存活的可能性与根据上述因素估算的抓地力的关系图,对于Parietex Progrip和Dynamesh Cicat,持久修补所需通过的抓地力为10,对于Dynamesh IPOM为25。可以重新计算先前发表的临床数据以评估MDAR,并估算重建的抓地力。在这些重新计算中,发现MDAR与长期复发率之间存在相关性。可计算出一个名为抓地力的无量纲数。抓地力可通过固定以可重复的方式进行修正。更高的抓地力可提高腹疝修补术的耐久性。我们认为在临床环境中,更高的抓地力会导致更低的复发率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/bea456187e64/fsurg-04-00078-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/bc0989437a27/fsurg-04-00078-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/c747dd3bdc62/fsurg-04-00078-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/655883b49f91/fsurg-04-00078-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/7c90bcfa3fb2/fsurg-04-00078-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/75409c294b0a/fsurg-04-00078-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/bb174d4f4f82/fsurg-04-00078-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/bea456187e64/fsurg-04-00078-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/bc0989437a27/fsurg-04-00078-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/c747dd3bdc62/fsurg-04-00078-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/655883b49f91/fsurg-04-00078-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/7c90bcfa3fb2/fsurg-04-00078-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/75409c294b0a/fsurg-04-00078-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/bb174d4f4f82/fsurg-04-00078-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aae/5780431/bea456187e64/fsurg-04-00078-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the GRIP of Ventral Hernia Repair: How to Securely Fasten DIS Classified Meshes.评估腹疝修补术的抓持力:如何牢固固定DIS分类补片。
Front Surg. 2018 Jan 19;4:78. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00078. eCollection 2017.
2
Bridging with reduced overlap: fixation and peritoneal grip can prevent slippage of DIS class A meshes.减少重叠的桥接:固定和腹膜抓持可防止DIS A类网片移位。
Hernia. 2017 Jun;21(3):455-467. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1583-1. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
3
Increasing hernia size requires higher GRIP values for a biomechanically stable ventral hernia repair.对于生物力学稳定的腹疝修补术,增大的疝尺寸需要更高的GRIP值。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Apr 19;42:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.04.002. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Dynamic intermittent strain can rapidly impair ventral hernia repair.动态间歇性应变会迅速损害腹疝修补术。
J Biomech. 2015 Nov 26;48(15):4026-4036. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.045. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
5
Pain and convalescence following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后的疼痛与康复
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Dec;58(12):B4369.
6
Decreased re-operation rate for recurrence after defect closure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with a permanent tack fixated mesh: a nationwide cohort study.使用永久钉固定补片的腹腔镜腹疝修补术中缺损闭合后复发的再次手术率降低:一项全国性队列研究
Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):577-584. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1776-2. Epub 2018 May 10.
7
The Grip Concept of Incisional Hernia Repair-Dynamic Bench Test, CT Abdomen With Valsalva and 1-Year Clinical Results.切口疝修补的握力概念——动态台架试验、Valsalva动作下的腹部CT及1年临床结果
Front Surg. 2021 Apr 14;8:602181. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.602181. eCollection 2021.
8
Biomechanical Influences on Mesh-Related Complications in Incisional Hernia Repair.切口疝修补术中生物力学对补片相关并发症的影响
Front Surg. 2021 Oct 29;8:763957. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.763957. eCollection 2021.
9
Adding sutures to tack fixation of mesh does not lower the re-operation rate after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a nationwide cohort study.在腹腔镜腹疝修补术中,在补片钉合固定基础上增加缝线并不能降低再次手术率:一项全国性队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Jun;403(4):521-527. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1681-2. Epub 2018 May 21.
10
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
To infinity and beyond: the promise of data-driven 3D printing of hernia mesh - a primer for surgeons.飞向无限,超越想象:数据驱动的疝修补网片3D打印的前景——外科医生入门指南
Hernia. 2025 Sep 1;29(1):270. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03434-4.
2
Biomechanics of the abdominal wall before and after ventral hernia repair using dynamic MRI.使用动态磁共振成像评估腹疝修补术前和术后腹壁的生物力学
Hernia. 2025 May 24;29(1):185. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03337-4.
3
Glued suture-less peritoneum closure in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair reduces acute postoperative pain.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair does not reduce 30-day wound complications.腹腔镜腹疝修补术中一期筋膜关闭并不会降低 30 天伤口并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4551-4557. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5515-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
2
Bridging with reduced overlap: fixation and peritoneal grip can prevent slippage of DIS class A meshes.减少重叠的桥接:固定和腹膜抓持可防止DIS A类网片移位。
Hernia. 2017 Jun;21(3):455-467. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1583-1. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
3
Assessment of predictive factors for recurrence in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a bridging technique.
腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中使用黏合免缝线腹膜关闭术可减少急性术后疼痛。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 23;14(1):11786. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62364-w.
4
Three-year follow-up of the grip concept: an open, prospective, observational registry study on biomechanically calculated abdominal wall repair for complex incisional hernias.握力概念的 3 年随访:一项针对复杂切口疝的生物力学计算腹壁修复的开放性、前瞻性、观察性注册研究。
Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):913-924. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03064-2. Epub 2024 May 18.
5
Biomechanical causes for failure of the Physiomesh/Securestrap system.Physiomesh/Securestrap 系统失败的生物力学原因。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 16;13(1):17504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44940-8.
6
STRONGHOLD first-year results of biomechanically calculated abdominal wall repair: a propensity score matching.STRONGHOLD 研究中生物力学计算的腹壁修复的 1 年结果:倾向评分匹配。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02897-7. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
7
Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜腹疝修补术中腹膜桥接与不缝合的比较:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Feb 2;4(1):e257. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000257. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Modified Chevrel technique for abdominal closure in critically ill patients with abdominal hypertension and limited options for closure.改良 Chevrel 技术用于治疗合并腹腔高压且腹壁关闭选择有限的危重症患者。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02797-w. Epub 2023 May 4.
9
The outcomes of open anterior component separation versus posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release for complex incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放式前部分分离与横腹肌腱膜释放的后部分分离治疗复杂切口疝的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):503-517. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02745-8. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
10
Is mesh fixation necessary in laparoendoscopic techniques for M3 inguinal defects? An experimental study.腹腔镜技术治疗 M3 腹股沟缺损时是否需要网片固定?一项实验研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1781-1788. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09699-5. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
评估使用桥接技术的腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的预测因素。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3656-3663. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique (EMILOS)-a new technique for ventral hernia repair.内镜下迷你/小切口腹膜前修补技术(EMILOS)——一种腹疝修补新技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1522-0. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
5
Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.择期切口疝修补术后的长期复发和并发症。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217.
6
Defects and donuts: the importance of the mesh:defect area ratio.缺损与“甜甜圈”:网片与缺损面积比的重要性。
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):893-895. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1524-4. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
Dynamic intermittent strain can rapidly impair ventral hernia repair.动态间歇性应变会迅速损害腹疝修补术。
J Biomech. 2015 Nov 26;48(15):4026-4036. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.045. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
8
Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.合适的补片重叠是腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术后疝复发的关键决定因素。
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1399-9. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
9
How Long Do We Need to Follow-Up Our Hernia Patients to Find the Real Recurrence Rate?我们需要对疝气患者进行多长时间的随访才能得出真正的复发率?
Front Surg. 2015 Jun 16;2:24. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00024. eCollection 2015.
10
Biomechanical abdominal wall model applied to hernia repair.应用于疝修补的生物力学腹壁模型。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(2):e133-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9687.