Suppr超能文献

2017 - 2018年坦桑尼亚大陆不同传播环境下疟疾病例管理的质量

The quality of malaria case management in different transmission settings in Tanzania mainland, 2017-2018.

作者信息

Hussein Ally Kassim, Tarimo Donath, Reaves Erik J, Chacky Frank, Abade Ahmed Mohamed, Mwalimu Charles Dismas, Mohamed Ally, Nasser Ahlam, Kishimba Rogath Saika

机构信息

Tanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.

Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 21;3(8):e0002318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002318. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Tanzania is undergoing an epidemiological transition for malaria transmission with some areas of the country having <10% (hypoendemic) and other areas 10% - 50% malaria prevalence (mesoendemic). It is not known whether there is a difference in the quality of malaria case management based on endemicity in Tanzania mainland. We examined the influence of endemicity on the quality of malaria case management at health facilities. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1713 health facilities in Tanzania mainland, using data collected by the National Malaria Control Program through an assessment tool to evaluate quality of malaria case management. The data was gathered from September 2017 to December 2018. Using standard quality factors, mean scores from facilities in the different endemicity regions were compared by a Student's t-test. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association between facility performance (score) and endemicity (mesoendemic vs. hypoendemic). Facilities in mesoendemic regions scored higher than those in hypoendemic regions on the overall quality of services [difference in mean scores ([Formula: see text]) = 2.52; (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.12, 3.91)], site readiness [[Formula: see text] = 2.97; (95% CI 1.30, 4.61)], availability of malaria reference materials [[Formula: see text] = 4.91; (95% CI 2.05, 7.76)], availability of Health Management Information System tools [[Formula: see text] = 5.86; (95% CI 3.80, 7.92)] and patient satisfaction [[Formula: see text] = 6.61; (95% CI 3.75, 9.48)]. Predictors associated with lower facility scores included; being located in a hypoendemic region [β: -2.49; (95% CI -3.83, -1.15)] and urban area [β: -3.84; (95% CI -5.60, -2.08)]. These findings highlight the differences in quality of malaria case management based on endemicity, but there is still a need to target improvement efforts in underperforming facilities, regardless of endemicity.

摘要

坦桑尼亚正在经历疟疾传播的流行病学转变,该国一些地区的疟疾流行率低于10%(低流行区),而其他地区的疟疾流行率为10%至50%(中流行区)。尚不清楚坦桑尼亚大陆基于流行程度的疟疾病例管理质量是否存在差异。我们研究了流行程度对卫生设施疟疾病例管理质量的影响。我们对坦桑尼亚大陆的1713个卫生设施进行了横断面分析,使用了国家疟疾控制项目通过评估工具收集的数据来评估疟疾病例管理质量。数据收集于2017年9月至2018年12月。使用标准质量因素,通过学生t检验比较不同流行程度地区设施的平均得分。进行了简单和多元线性回归分析,以确定设施绩效(得分)与流行程度(中流行区与低流行区)之间的关联。中流行区的设施在总体服务质量[平均得分差异([公式:见正文])=2.52;(95%置信区间(CI)1.12,3.91)]、场地准备情况[[公式:见正文]=2.97;(95%CI 1.30,4.61)]、疟疾参考资料的可用性[[公式:见正文]=4.91;(95%CI 2.05,7.76)]、卫生管理信息系统工具的可用性[[公式:见正文]=5.86;(95%CI 3.80,7.92)]和患者满意度[[公式:见正文]=6.61;(95%CI 3.75,9.48)]方面的得分高于低流行区的设施。与较低设施得分相关的预测因素包括;位于低流行区[β:-2.49;(95%CI -3.83,-1.15)]和城市地区[β:-3.84;(95%CI -5.60,-2.08)]。这些发现突出了基于流行程度的疟疾病例管理质量差异,但仍需要针对表现不佳的设施开展改进工作,无论其流行程度如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8554/10441786/7b687de624ef/pgph.0002318.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验