Makhmudova Umidakhon, Wolf Michaela, Willfeld Kathy, Beier Lea, Weingärtner Oliver
Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin I.
Cholesterin & Co e. V.: Patientenorganisation für Patienten mit Familiärer Hypercholesterinämie oder anderen schweren genetischen Fettstoffwechselstörungen (CholCo e. V.), Frankfurt/M.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2023 Sep;148(19):e101-e110. doi: 10.1055/a-2117-6504. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
Cardiovascular disease accounts for one third of deaths in Germany. Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are considered a major risk factor. Lowering LDL-C levels is therefore an integral part of the prevention of cardiovascular events.
The aim of this work is to identify potential differences between primary prevention (PP) and secondary prevention (SP) by means of a post-hoc comparison of cross-sectional data from the PROCYON survey. Medical history, concomitant diseases, adherence, and disease awareness in relation to hypercholesterolemia were queried.
5,494 patients had participated in the survey (PP: 3,798; SP: 1,696). Comparison of the results showed a numerically higher proportion of women (PP 70.7% vs. SP 42.5%) as well as more frequent comorbidities such as hypertension (PP 45.6% vs. SP 61.0%), obesity (PP 20.9% vs. SP 27.4%), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (PP 14.1% vs. SP 23.8%). In primary prevention, hypercholesterolemia was most often diagnosed during screening (PP 74.6%), and in secondary prevention, the diagnosis was most often made during cardiovascular-related hospitalization (SP 58.0%). A cardiologist was consulted by 16.3% (PP) and 54.0% (SP) of patients, respectively. At least semiannual LDL-C checks (PP 46.8% vs. SP 77.9%) and drug intervention (PP 43.0% vs. SP 87.0%) were more frequent in the secondary prevention group. In addition, differences in the implementation of lifestyle changes, improvement of LDL-C levels, adjustment of therapy as well as adherence, treatment satisfaction and patient knowledge were observed.
The comparison of primary and secondary prevention from the PROCYON survey shows overall better utilization of treatment options and higher intensity of care in the secondary prevention group. However, there is still great potential for improvement in both groups to ensure efficient prevention of cardiovascular events.
在德国,心血管疾病导致的死亡占总死亡人数的三分之一。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平升高被视为主要危险因素。因此,降低LDL-C水平是预防心血管事件不可或缺的一部分。
本研究旨在通过对PROCYON调查的横断面数据进行事后比较,确定一级预防(PP)和二级预防(SP)之间的潜在差异。查询了与高胆固醇血症相关的病史、合并症、依从性和疾病知晓情况。
5494名患者参与了调查(PP:3798例;SP:1696例)。结果比较显示,女性比例在数值上更高(PP为70.7%,SP为42.5%),同时合并症更为常见,如高血压(PP为45.6%,SP为61.0%)、肥胖(PP为20.9%,SP为27.4%)和2型糖尿病(PP为14.1%,SP为23.8%)。在一级预防中,高胆固醇血症最常在筛查期间被诊断出来(PP为74.6%),而在二级预防中,诊断最常在心血管相关住院期间做出(SP为58.0%)。分别有16.3%(PP)和54.0%(SP)的患者咨询了心脏病专家。二级预防组中至少每半年进行一次LDL-C检查(PP为46.8%,SP为77.9%)和药物干预(PP为43.0%,SP为87.0%)更为频繁。此外,在生活方式改变的实施、LDL-C水平的改善、治疗调整以及依从性、治疗满意度和患者知识方面也观察到了差异。
PROCYON调查中一级预防和二级预防的比较表明,二级预防组在治疗选择的总体利用和护理强度方面更好。然而,两组在确保有效预防心血管事件方面仍有很大的改进潜力。