Panchyrz Ivonne, Hoffmann Julia, Harst Lorenz, Pohl Solveig, Bauer Michael, Blaschke Sabine, Bodenstein Marc, Engelhart Steffen, Gärtner Barbara, Graf Jürgen, Hanses Frank, Held Hanns-Christoph, Hinzmann Dominik, Khan Naseer, Kleber Christian, Kolibay Felix, Kubulus Darius, Liske Stefanie, Oberfeld Jörg, Pletz Mathias Wilhelm, Prückner Stephan, Rohde Gernot, Spinner Christoph D, Stehr Sebastian, Willam Carsten, Schmitt Jochen
TU Dresden, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Dresden, Germany.
Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Dec;85(12):1173-1182. doi: 10.1055/a-2109-9882. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
Since the beginning of the pandemic in spring 2020, inpatient healthcare has been under enormous burden, which is reflected especially in overworked staff, imprecise bed planning and/or data transfer. According to the recommendation of the Science Council, university clinics should play a controlling role in regional healthcare and act in conjunction with surrounding hospitals and practices.
In September 2021, 31 representatives from 18 university hospitals were invited to a hybrid Delphi study with a total of 4 survey rounds to discuss criteria for effective inpatient care in a pandemic situation, which were extracted from previous expert interviews. Criteria that were classified as very important/relevant by≥75% of the participants in the first round of the survey (consensus definition) were then further summarized in 4 different small groups. In a third Delphi round, all participants came together again to discuss the results of the small group discussions. Subsequently, these were prioritized as Optional ("can"), Desirable ("should") or Necessary ("must") recommendations.
Of the invited clinical experts, 21 (67.7%) participated in at least one Delphi round. In an online survey (1st Delphi round), 233 criteria were agreed upon and reduced to 84 criteria for future pandemic management in four thematic small group discussions (2nd Delphi round) and divided into the small groups as follows: "Crisis Management and Crisis Plans" (n=20), "Human Resources Management and Internal Communication" (n=16), "Regional Integration and External Communication" (n=24) and "Capacity Management and Case & Care" (n=24). In the following group discussion (3rd Delphi round), the criteria were further modified and agreed upon by the experts, so that in the end result, there were 23 essential requirements and recommendations for effective inpatient care in a pandemic situation.
The results draw attention to key demands of clinical representatives, for example, comprehensive digitization, standardization of processes and better (supra) regional networking in order to be able to guarantee needs-based care even under pandemic conditions. The present consensus recommendations can serve as guidelines for future pandemic management in the inpatient care sector.
自2020年春季疫情开始以来,住院医疗服务一直承受着巨大压力,这尤其体现在工作人员过度劳累、床位规划不精确和/或数据传输方面。根据科学委员会的建议,大学诊所应在区域医疗保健中发挥控制作用,并与周边医院及医疗机构协同行动。
2021年9月,邀请了来自18所大学医院的31名代表参加一项混合式德尔菲研究,共进行4轮调查,以讨论大流行情况下有效住院护理的标准,这些标准是从之前的专家访谈中提炼出来的。第一轮调查中被≥75%的参与者归类为非常重要/相关的标准(共识定义),随后在4个不同的小组中进一步汇总。在第三轮德尔菲调查中,所有参与者再次聚集在一起讨论小组讨论的结果。随后,将这些结果优先划分为可选(“可以”)、期望(“应该”)或必要(“必须”)建议。
在受邀的临床专家中,21人(67.7%)至少参加了一轮德尔菲调查。在在线调查(第一轮德尔菲调查)中,共商定了233条标准,并在4次主题小组讨论(第二轮德尔菲调查)中缩减至84条用于未来大流行管理的标准,并分为以下小组:“危机管理与危机计划”(20条)、“人力资源管理与内部沟通”(16条)、“区域整合与外部沟通”(24条)以及“能力管理与病例及护理”(24条)。在接下来的小组讨论(第三轮德尔菲调查)中,专家们对这些标准进行了进一步修改并达成共识,最终得出了23条大流行情况下有效住院护理的基本要求和建议。
研究结果凸显了临床代表的关键需求,例如全面数字化、流程标准化以及更好的(超)区域联网,以便即使在大流行条件下也能保证按需护理。目前的共识建议可作为住院护理领域未来大流行管理的指导方针。