• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性的妊娠率:一项回顾性记录审查

Pregnancy Rates in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Using Letrozole Versus Clomiphene Citrate: A Retrospective Record Review.

作者信息

Bahawi Yara O, Radwan Ebtesam M, Khouj Maryam A, Alotaibi Rahaf K, Bajuwaiber Nada A, Baghlaf Lama F, AlFaraj Wala F, Oraif Ayman M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 21;15(7):e42257. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42257. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.42257
PMID:37605693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10440068/
Abstract

Background and objectives Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prominent cause of anovulation. Thus, this study aimed to compare the pregnancy rates of women with PCOS treated with letrozole (LE) or clomiphene citrate (CC) at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. Patients and methods A retrospective record review was conducted from April 2021 to August 2022 to review 1370 records of women with PCOS from January 2015 to December 2021. Sixty-one patients were included in this analysis. Chi-square tests and independent sample t-tests were used to analyze various associations. Statistical significance was set at < 0.05. Results Letrozole was associated with a higher pregnancy rate (41.7%) than CC (32.0%). However, this relationship was not statistically significant ( = .619). Furthermore, patients treated with letrozole required fewer cycles to achieve pregnancy (two cycles compared to three cycles). The different age groups and body mass indexes did not affect the pregnancy rate in either group. Conclusion No significant difference was found between CC and LE in ovulation induction and outcome among PCOS patients. Studies with larger sample sizes and multiple centers should be conducted in Saudi Arabia to obtain more conclusive results, which will eventually lead to changes in guidelines for anovulation treatment in women with PCOS.

摘要

背景与目的 多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是无排卵的一个主要原因。因此,本研究旨在比较在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院接受来曲唑(LE)或枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)治疗的PCOS女性的妊娠率。

患者与方法 对2021年4月至2022年8月期间进行回顾性记录审查,以回顾2015年1月至2021年12月期间1370例PCOS女性的记录。本分析纳入了61例患者。采用卡方检验和独立样本t检验来分析各种关联。设定统计学显著性为<0.05。

结果 来曲唑的妊娠率(41.7%)高于CC(32.0%)。然而,这种关系无统计学显著性(=0.619)。此外,接受来曲唑治疗的患者达到妊娠所需的周期数更少(两个周期,而CC组为三个周期)。不同年龄组和体重指数对两组的妊娠率均无影响。

结论 在PCOS患者的促排卵及结局方面,CC和LE之间未发现显著差异。沙特阿拉伯应开展更大样本量和多中心的研究以获得更具结论性的结果,这最终将导致PCOS女性无排卵治疗指南的改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/10440068/366d11b47aa8/cureus-0015-00000042257-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/10440068/366d11b47aa8/cureus-0015-00000042257-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/10440068/366d11b47aa8/cureus-0015-00000042257-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Pregnancy Rates in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Using Letrozole Versus Clomiphene Citrate: A Retrospective Record Review.使用来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性的妊娠率:一项回顾性记录审查
Cureus. 2023 Jul 21;15(7):e42257. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42257. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Double-blind randomized controlled trial of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征不孕患者的双盲随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1631-1638. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex227.
3
First-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome: an individual participant data meta-analysis.一线诱导排卵治疗多囊卵巢综合征:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Nov 5;25(6):717-732. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz029.
4
Higher ovulation rate with letrozole as compared with clomiphene citrate in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与克罗米酚相比,枸橼酸氯米酚在多囊卵巢综合征不孕妇女中增加排卵率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hormones (Athens). 2021 Sep;20(3):449-461. doi: 10.1007/s42000-021-00289-z. Epub 2021 May 25.
5
[Optimal Ovulation Induction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Resistant to Clomiphene Citrate or Letrozole.].[多囊卵巢综合征对枸橼酸氯米芬或来曲唑耐药时的最佳促排卵治疗。]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Nov;47(6):874-877.
6
Aromatase inhibitors (letrozole) for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.芳香化酶抑制剂(来曲唑)用于多囊卵巢综合征的不孕女性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 24;5(5):CD010287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub3.
7
Aromatase inhibitors for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.用于多囊卵巢综合征不孕女性的芳香化酶抑制剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 24(2):CD010287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub2.
8
Comparing efficacy and safety of stair step protocols for clomiphene citrate and letrozole in ovulation induction for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a randomized controlled clinical trial.比较阶梯方案氯米酚和来曲唑诱导多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)妇女排卵的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Med Life. 2023 May;16(5):725-730. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0069.
9
Emulating a target trial of the comparative effectiveness of clomiphene citrate and letrozole for ovulation induction.模拟枸橼酸氯米酚和来曲唑用于诱导排卵的比较有效性的目标试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Apr 1;37(4):793-805. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac005.
10
Comparison of clomiphene citrate and letrozole for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective randomized trial.克罗米芬柠檬酸盐与来曲唑用于多囊卵巢综合征女性促排卵的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017 Nov;33(11):872-876. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1332174. Epub 2017 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Ovulation and Luteal Phase Tracking Methods and Technologies for Fertility and Family Planning: A Review.当前用于生育和计划生育的排卵和黄体期跟踪方法和技术:综述。
Semin Reprod Med. 2024 Jun;42(2):100-111. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791190. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
The Success of Ovulation Induction with Letrozole and Gonadotropins in Obese and Nonobese Women: A Study from a Tertiary Center.来曲唑与促性腺激素联合诱导肥胖和非肥胖女性排卵的成功率:一项来自三级中心的研究。
Int J Reprod Med. 2022 Jun 17;2022:1931716. doi: 10.1155/2022/1931716. eCollection 2022.
2
Letrozole is superior to clomiphene citrate in ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.来曲唑在多囊卵巢综合征患者的促排卵治疗中优于枸橼酸氯米芬。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(7):1460-1465. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.3345.
3
Letrozole versus clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in anovulatory women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.
来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征排卵障碍性不孕的随机对照研究
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152(3):345-350. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13375. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Comparison of endometrial receptivity of clomiphene citrate versus letrozole in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled study.枸橼酸氯米酚与来曲唑治疗多囊卵巢综合征患者的子宫内膜容受性比较:一项随机对照研究。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;35(10):862-865. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1612358. Epub 2019 May 12.
5
Double-blind randomized controlled trial of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征不孕患者的双盲随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1631-1638. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex227.
6
Comparison of clomiphene citrate and letrozole for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective randomized trial.克罗米芬柠檬酸盐与来曲唑用于多囊卵巢综合征女性促排卵的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017 Nov;33(11):872-876. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1332174. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
New diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征的新诊断
BMJ. 2017 Jan 12;356:i6456. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6456.
8
Comparison of letrazole and clomiphene citrate in women with polycystic ovaries undergoing ovarian stimulation.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬对多囊卵巢综合征患者促排卵效果的比较
J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;65(11):1149-52.
9
Letrozole versus clomiphene for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome.来曲唑与氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征不孕的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):119-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313517.
10
The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a normal population according to the Rotterdam criteria versus revised criteria including anti-Mullerian hormone.根据鹿特丹标准与包括抗苗勒管激素在内的修订标准,正常人群中多囊卵巢综合征的患病率。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Apr;29(4):791-801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det469. Epub 2014 Jan 16.