• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay.成年人类的自我控制:正向强化物数量与延迟的变化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):159-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-159.
2
Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.试验间强化物对自我控制选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):83-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-83.
3
Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm.在自我控制范式中强化延迟期间的反应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):267-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-267.
4
Procrastination by pigeons: preference for larger, more delayed work requirements.鸽子的拖延:对更大、延迟更多的工作要求的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):159-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-159.
5
Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.冲动与自控选择之间的偏好逆转。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 May;99(3):260-76. doi: 10.1002/jeab.23. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
6
Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.概率性强化条件下的选择:延迟和条件性强化物的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):63-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-63.
7
Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.人类在自我控制选择情境中的选择:对强化物数量、强化物延迟和整体强化密度的敏感度。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):87-102. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-87.
8
Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.并发程序安排:强化物的短期和长期影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):257-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-257.
9
Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.调整延迟时间表中对延迟强化物的选择:绝对强化物大小和剥夺水平的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1992 Jul;45(1):1-13.
10
Choice between delayed reinforcers in a discrete-trials schedule: the effect of deprivation level.离散试验日程中延迟强化物之间的选择:剥夺水平的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1992 Jan;44(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/02724999208250599.

引用本文的文献

1
Delayed Consequences in General Education through the Lenses of Delay Discounting and Verbal Behavior.从延迟折扣和言语行为视角看通识教育中的延迟后果。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2024 Feb 12;40(2):216-234. doi: 10.1007/s40616-024-00202-w. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Self-Control Training: A Scoping Review.自我控制训练:一项范围综述
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Nov 30;17(1):137-156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00885-y. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Increasing Physical Activity among Breast Cancer Survivors by Modulating Temporal Orientation with rTMS: Feasibility and Potential Efficacy.利用 rTMS 调节时间取向增加乳腺癌幸存者的身体活动:可行性和潜在疗效。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 24;18(19):10052. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910052.
4
Smoking relapse risk is increased among individuals in recovery.在康复中的个体中,吸烟复发的风险增加。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Sep 1;202:93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
To smoke or not to smoke: Does delay discounting affect the proximal choice to smoke?吸烟还是不吸:延迟折扣是否会影响吸烟的近端选择?
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(8):1237-1246. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1528463. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
6
The treasure of now and an uncertain future: Delay discounting and health behaviors among cancer survivors.现在的宝藏和不确定的未来:癌症幸存者的延迟折扣和健康行为。
Cancer. 2018 Dec 15;124(24):4711-4719. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31759. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
7
Reassessing intertemporal choice: human decision-making is more optimal in a foraging task than in a self-control task.重新评估跨期选择:人类在觅食任务中的决策比在自我控制任务中更具优化性。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 6;6:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00095. eCollection 2015.
8
Training Tolerance to Delay Using the Escalating Interest Task.使用递增兴趣任务训练延迟耐受性。
Psychol Rec. 2014 Sep;64(3):423-431. doi: 10.1007/s40732-014-0045-8.
9
Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Experiential Discounting Task.经验折扣任务的重测信度和结构效度。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Apr;21(2):155-63. doi: 10.1037/a0031725. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
10
Saving the best for last? A cross-species analysis of choices between reinforcer sequences.留到最后才是最好的?跨物种强化序列选择的分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jul;98(1):45-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-45.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of verbal behavior in human learning: II. Developmental differences.言语行为在人类学习中的作用:二、发展差异。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):165-81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-165.
2
Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences.自我控制范式中的选择:基于经验差异的量化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):53-67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-53.
3
Choice: Some quantitative relations.选择:一些定量关系。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):1-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-1.
4
Preference in concurrent variable-interval fixed-ratio schedules.同时性变化间隔固定比例时间表中的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):81-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-81.
5
Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies.无指导的人类反应:低反应率对日程安排变化的敏感性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Sep;36(2):207-20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-207.
6
Delay or rate of food delivery as determiners of response rate.食物传递的延迟或速率作为反应速率的决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):129-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-129.
7
Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm.鸽子在米歇尔范式下的自我控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):3-21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-3.
8
Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure.在“自我控制”范式中的选择:消退程序的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jul;30(1):11-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-11.
9
Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies.无指导的人类反应:对比率和间隔关联的敏感性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453-67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-453.
10
On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.两种偏离匹配律的情况:偏向和不匹配。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.

成年人类的自我控制:正向强化物数量与延迟的变化

Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay.

作者信息

Logue A W, Peña-Correal T E, Rodriguez M L, Kabela E

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):159-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-159.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1986.46-159
PMID:3760749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1348283/
Abstract

In five experiments, choice responding of female human adults was examined, as a function of variations in reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay. Experiment 1 used a discrete-trials procedure, and Experiments 2, 3, 4, and 5 used a concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule. Reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay were varied both separately and together. In contrast to results previously reported with pigeons, the subjects in the present experiments usually chose the larger reinforcers even when those reinforcers were delayed. Together, the results from all the experiments suggest that the subjects followed a maximization strategy in choosing reinforcers. Such behavior makes it easy to observe self-control and difficult to observe impulsiveness in traditional laboratory experiments that use adult human subjects.

摘要

在五项实验中,研究了成年女性的选择反应,该反应是强化物数量和强化物延迟变化的函数。实验1采用离散试验程序,实验2、3、4和5采用并发可变间隔可变间隔时间表。强化物数量和强化物延迟分别和一起进行了变化。与先前用鸽子报道的结果相反,本实验中的受试者通常选择较大的强化物,即使这些强化物被延迟。所有实验的结果共同表明,受试者在选择强化物时遵循最大化策略。这种行为使得在使用成年人类受试者的传统实验室实验中很容易观察到自我控制,而很难观察到冲动行为。