Department of Infection Control and Vaccines, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
ECDC Fellowship Programme, Field Epidemiology path (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 25;52(6):1716-1724. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad114.
Evidence on the durability of the protection of a fourth dose of a monovalent or bivalent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among older people during the predominant Omicron period is needed.
We performed a population-based cohort study in Norway covering the time from 1 July 2022 to 15 January 2023, including individuals ≥75 years of age who had received at least a third dose. Using Cox proportional hazard models on severe COVID-19-associated outcome measures and all-cause mortality, we estimated the vaccine effectiveness of mono- and bivalent vaccines, comparing fourth- to third-dose recipients (>24 weeks ago). Vaccine status was included as a time-varying covariate and models were adjusted for potential confounders.
We included 408 073 individuals. A fourth dose with either monovalent or bivalent mRNA vaccine showed increased protection against COVID-19-associated mortality relative to a third dose in individuals ≥75 years of age. We estimated a protective effect for the bivalent BA.1 vaccine [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.32] relative to the bivalent BA.4-5 (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.56) and a monovalent dose (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.26-0.45) 2-9 weeks after vaccination compared with recipients with a third dose >24 weeks ago. The increased protective effect waned with no added protection for the monovalent vaccine after 33 weeks compared with a third dose.
Our results indicate an increased protective effect of a fourth dose against severe outcomes compared with a third dose, with decreasing effect with time since the last dose.
在以奥密克戎为主导的时期,需要有关于老年人接种单价或双价信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗第四剂对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的保护持久性的证据。
我们在挪威进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,时间从 2022 年 7 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 15 日,包括至少接种过第三剂疫苗的年龄≥75 岁的个体。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估严重 COVID-19 相关结局和全因死亡率,比较第四剂和第三剂(>24 周前)接种者的疫苗有效性。疫苗状态作为时变协变量包含在内,模型调整了潜在混杂因素。
我们纳入了 408073 名个体。与≥75 岁年龄组第三剂接种者相比,接种单价或双价 mRNA 疫苗的第四剂对 COVID-19 相关死亡有更高的保护作用。我们估计 BA.1 双价疫苗相对 BA.4-5 双价疫苗(调整后的危险比[aHR]0.08,95%可信区间[CI]0.02-0.32)和单价疫苗(aHR 0.34,95%CI 0.26-0.45)的保护效果更好,接种后 2-9 周,而与>24 周前接种第三剂的个体相比。接种第四剂后 33 周,与第三剂相比,保护作用不再增加,且单价疫苗无额外保护作用。
与第三剂相比,第四剂对严重结局的保护作用增加,且随着最后一剂接种时间的延长,保护作用逐渐减弱。