• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑的交互模型:差异假设的评估

The interactional model of anxiety: an evaluation of the differential hypothesis.

作者信息

Mothersill K J, Dobson K S, Neufeld R W

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Sep;51(3):640-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.3.640.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.51.3.640
PMID:3761150
Abstract

The interactional model of anxiety states that individuals who score high on trait anxiety measure for a specific situation dimension will respond with elevated state anxiety only in reaction to encounters with congruent situations. We tested this model by presenting subjects who scored high or low on ego threat, physical danger, novelty ambiguity, and daily routine trait measures with stressors representative of the four situation dimensions. The interactional model was partially supported for ego threat trait anxiety. However, results generally supported the influence of situation rather than the trait or interaction on anxiety response. The lack of trait factor independence for the novelty ambiguity and daily routine trait dimensions is discussed as a potential reason for the nonsupport of the interactional model. Finally, we suggest that the experimental design used in this study is a more accurate and vigorous test of the differential hypothesis than past research.

摘要

焦虑的交互模型表明,在特定情境维度的特质焦虑测量中得分高的个体,只有在面对与之相符的情境时,才会以升高的状态焦虑做出反应。我们通过向在自我威胁、身体危险、新奇模糊性和日常惯例特质测量中得分高或低的受试者呈现代表这四个情境维度的应激源,来检验这一模型。对于自我威胁特质焦虑,交互模型得到了部分支持。然而,结果总体上支持情境对焦虑反应的影响,而非特质或交互作用的影响。新奇模糊性和日常惯例特质维度缺乏特质因素独立性,被认为是交互模型未得到支持的一个潜在原因。最后,我们认为本研究中使用的实验设计比以往研究更准确、有力地检验了差异假设。

相似文献

1
The interactional model of anxiety: an evaluation of the differential hypothesis.焦虑的交互模型:差异假设的评估
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Sep;51(3):640-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.3.640.
2
Multidimensionality of state and trait anxiety: factor structure of the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales.状态焦虑与特质焦虑的多维性:恩德勒多维焦虑量表的因素结构
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Jun;60(6):919-26. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.6.919.
3
The trait anxiety-perception score: a composite predictor for state anxiety.特质焦虑-感知得分:一种状态焦虑的综合预测指标。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Apr;58(4):679-84. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.4.679.
4
Sociotropy-autonomy and situation-specific anxiety.社会依赖-自主与特定情境焦虑
Psychol Rep. 2004 Feb;94(1):67-76. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.1.67-76.
5
Anxiety and performance in two ego threatening situations.两种自我威胁情境下的焦虑与表现
J Pers Assess. 1984 Apr;48(2):168-72. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4802_11.
6
Evidence of differential stability of state and trait anxiety in adults.成人状态焦虑和特质焦虑差异稳定性的证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Mar;60(3):471-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.3.471.
7
The interaction model of anxiety and the threat of Quebec's separation from Canada.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jan;76(1):143-50. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.1.143.
8
Situational and trait determinants of competitive state anxiety.
Percept Mot Skills. 1987 Jun;64(3 Pt 1):767-73. doi: 10.2466/pms.1987.64.3.767.
9
Personality and situation as determinants of desire to drink in young adults.人格与情境对年轻人饮酒欲望的影响因素
Int J Addict. 1987 Jul;22(7):653-69. doi: 10.3109/10826088709027449.
10
Trait vs. state anxiety in different threatening situations.不同威胁情境下的特质焦虑与状态焦虑
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2017 Jul-Sep;39(3):147-157. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0044. Epub 2017 Aug 14.