Yerke Jason R, Mireles-Cabodevila Eduardo, Chen Alyssa Y, Bass Stephanie N, Reddy Anita J, Bauer Seth R, Kokoczka Lynne, Dugar Siddharth, Moghekar Ajit
Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Chest. 2024 Feb;165(2):348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.08.019. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
Historically, norepinephrine has been administered through a central venous catheter (CVC) because of concerns about the risk of ischemic tissue injury if extravasation from a peripheral IV catheter (PIVC) occurs. Recently, several reports have suggested that peripheral administration of norepinephrine may be safe.
Can a protocol for peripheral norepinephrine administration safely reduce the number of days a CVC is in use and frequency of CVC placement?
This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in the medical ICU at a quaternary care academic medical center. A protocol for peripheral norepinephrine administration was developed and implemented in the medical ICU at the study site. The protocol was recommended for use in patients who met prespecified criteria, but was used at the treating clinician's discretion. All adult patients admitted to the medical ICU receiving norepinephrine through a PIVC from February 2019 through June 2021 were included.
The primary outcome was the number of days of CVC use that were avoided per patient, and the secondary safety outcomes included the incidence of extravasation events. Six hundred thirty-five patients received peripherally administered norepinephrine. The median number of CVC days avoided per patient was 1 (interquartile range, 0-2 days per patient). Of the 603 patients who received norepinephrine peripherally as the first norepinephrine exposure, 311 patients (51.6%) never required CVC insertion. Extravasation of norepinephrine occurred in 35 patients (75.8 events/1,000 d of PIVC infusion [95% CI, 52.8-105.4 events/1,000 d of PIVC infusion]). Most extravasations caused no or minimal tissue injury. No patient required surgical intervention.
This study suggests that implementing a protocol for peripheral administration of norepinephrine safely can avoid 1 CVC day in the average patient, with 51.6% of patients not requiring CVC insertion. No patient experienced significant ischemic tissue injury with the protocol used. These data support performance of a randomized, prospective, multicenter study to characterize the net benefits of peripheral norepinephrine administration compared with norepinephrine administration through a CVC.
从历史上看,由于担心如果外周静脉导管(PIVC)发生药物外渗会有缺血性组织损伤的风险,去甲肾上腺素一直通过中心静脉导管(CVC)给药。最近,一些报告表明外周给予去甲肾上腺素可能是安全的。
外周给予去甲肾上腺素的方案能否安全地减少CVC的使用天数和CVC置管频率?
这是一项在一家四级医疗学术医学中心的内科重症监护病房(ICU)进行的前瞻性观察性队列研究。研究地点的内科ICU制定并实施了外周给予去甲肾上腺素的方案。该方案推荐用于符合预先设定标准的患者,但由治疗医生自行决定是否使用。纳入了2019年2月至2021年6月期间在该内科ICU通过PIVC接受去甲肾上腺素治疗的所有成年患者。
主要结局是每位患者避免使用CVC的天数,次要安全性结局包括外渗事件的发生率。635例患者接受了外周给予的去甲肾上腺素。每位患者避免使用CVC的天数中位数为1天(四分位间距,每位患者0 - 2天)。在603例首次接受外周去甲肾上腺素治疗的患者中,311例(51.6%)从未需要插入CVC。35例患者发生去甲肾上腺素外渗(每1000天PIVC输注中发生75.8次外渗事件[95%置信区间,每1000天PIVC输注中52.8 - 105.4次外渗事件])。大多数外渗未造成或仅造成轻微组织损伤。没有患者需要手术干预。
本研究表明,安全实施外周给予去甲肾上腺素的方案平均可使每位患者避免1天使用CVC,51.6%的患者无需插入CVC。使用该方案没有患者发生严重的缺血性组织损伤。这些数据支持进行一项随机、前瞻性、多中心研究,以确定外周给予去甲肾上腺素与通过CVC给予去甲肾上腺素相比的净益处。