• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Methods for the involvement of people living with dementia in research focused on the built environment: a protocol for a scoping review.方法:让患有痴呆症的人参与到以建筑环境为重点的研究中:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 24;13(8):e075350. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075350.
2
Consulting concepts and structures for people with dementia in Germany: a protocol for a 'grey-shaded' scoping review.德国痴呆症患者的咨询理念和结构:一项“灰色地带”范围综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e059771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059771.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Protocol for conducting scoping reviews to map implementation strategies in different care settings: focusing on evidence-based interventions for preselected phenomena in people with dementia.用于在不同照护环境中绘制实施策略的范围综述方案:专注于针对痴呆症患者的预选现象的基于证据的干预措施。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e051611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051611.
6
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Protocol for a scoping review on the methods for engaging long-term care residents with dementia in research and guideline development.关于在研究和指南制定中让患有痴呆症的长期护理居民参与的方法的范围综述协议。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 25;11(8):e051602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051602.
8
Facilitators and barriers to codesigning social robots with older adults with dementia: a scoping review protocol.促进和阻碍与痴呆症老年患者共同设计社交机器人的因素:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e080751. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080751.
9
Use of headphones for the delivery of music programs for people with dementia in long-term care homes: a scoping review protocol.用于长期护理院痴呆症患者音乐节目传递的耳机使用:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 29;14(4):e082892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082892.
10
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving quality of life of long-term care residents with dementia: a scoping review protocol.非药物干预改善痴呆长期照护居民生活质量的研究:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e032661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032661.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of environmental assessment tools for settings for individuals living with dementia.针对痴呆症患者生活环境的环境评估工具评估
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Sep 30;8(1):e12353. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12353. eCollection 2022.
2
Physical environmental designs in residential care to improve quality of life of older people.住宅护理中的物理环境设计,以提高老年人的生活质量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 7;3(3):CD012892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012892.pub2.
3
The impact of participatory dementia research on researchers: A systematic review.参与式痴呆症研究对研究人员的影响:系统评价。
Dementia (London). 2022 Apr;21(3):1012-1031. doi: 10.1177/14713012211067020. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
4
Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment - A Systematic Review.痴呆症或认知障碍患者的优先事项和偏好——一项系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Dec 14;15:2793-2807. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S333923. eCollection 2021.
5
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application.范围综述:加强和推进方法和应用。
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;10(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.开展范围综述:护理学和助产学学生、临床医生、研究人员和学者的实用指南。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Apr;77(4):2102-2113. doi: 10.1111/jan.14743. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
The Homestead: Developing a Conceptual Framework through Co-Creation for Innovating Long-Term Dementia Care Environments.《家园:通过共同创造创新长期痴呆症护理环境来开发概念框架》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 23;18(1):57. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010057.
9
How do Cochrane authors conduct web searching to identify studies? Findings from a cross-sectional sample of Cochrane Reviews.Cochrane 作者如何进行网络搜索以确定研究?对 Cochrane 综述的横断面样本的发现。
Health Info Libr J. 2020 Dec;37(4):293-318. doi: 10.1111/hir.12313. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
10
Reporting Guidelines for Community-Based Participatory Research Did Not Improve the Reporting Quality of Published Studies: A Systematic Review of Studies on Smoking Cessation.基于社区的参与式研究报告指南并未提高已发表研究报告的质量:一项关于戒烟的研究的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 31;17(11):3898. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113898.

方法:让患有痴呆症的人参与到以建筑环境为重点的研究中:系统评价方案。

Methods for the involvement of people living with dementia in research focused on the built environment: a protocol for a scoping review.

机构信息

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Standort Witten, Witten, Germany

School of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 24;13(8):e075350. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075350.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075350
PMID:37620266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10450054/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The positive influence of a well-designed built environment in dementia-specific care has been known for several years. Many studies focusing on the built environment have captured the perspectives of people living with dementia. However, it remains unclear to what degree and with which methods these individuals have been actively involved in research especially when attempting to understand their perspective. The planned scoping review aims to (1) synthesise methods and results from research about the built environment according to active involvement of people living with dementia and (2) describe facilitators and barriers to this active involvement to capture their perspectives in research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will use four search strategies: (1) searches in academic databases MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO via EBSCO, and Scopus; (2) grey literature searches via Google Scholar; (3) handsearches of non-academic environmental planning and design journals and (4) identifying other publications of key authors in the field. Additionally, backward and forward citation tracking will be performed via reference lists and Google Scholar, respectively. Relevant literature published between 2013 and 2023 will be identified for data extraction and synthesis. One researcher will perform each strategy. Title-abstract/full text-screening will be conducted using Covidence by two researchers. Results will be displayed in a table and through figures illustrating identified facilitators and barriers.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

We raised no ethical concerns for the planned scoping review. We will prepare the findings including the identified barriers with long-term care practitioners from our network to identify how changes in practical application methods can be addressed. This dialogue can serve as a basis for including people living with dementia to discuss highlighted barriers when researching their perspectives on the built environment. The scoping review results will be reported in both academic and non-academic journals and at academic conferences.

摘要

简介

良好设计的建筑环境对痴呆症护理的积极影响已经被人们认识多年。许多关注建筑环境的研究都捕捉了患有痴呆症的人的观点。然而,人们对这些个体在研究中积极参与的程度和方法仍不清楚,特别是在试图理解他们的观点时。本计划的范围综述旨在:(1)根据痴呆症患者的积极参与,综合关于建筑环境的研究方法和结果;(2)描述促进和阻碍这种积极参与的因素,以捕捉他们在研究中的观点。

方法和分析

我们将使用四种搜索策略:(1)通过 PubMed 中的 MEDLINE、EBSCO 中的 CINAHL 和 APA PsycINFO 进行学术数据库搜索,以及 Scopus 进行搜索;(2)通过 Google Scholar 进行灰色文献搜索;(3)手动搜索非学术环境规划和设计期刊;(4)确定该领域关键作者的其他出版物。此外,还将通过参考文献和 Google Scholar 分别进行回溯和前向引文跟踪。将识别 2013 年至 2023 年期间发表的相关文献进行数据提取和综合。每位研究人员将执行每种策略。两名研究人员将使用 Covidence 进行标题-摘要/全文筛选。结果将以表格和说明确定的促进因素和障碍的图表形式展示。

伦理和传播

我们对计划的范围综述没有提出伦理问题。我们将与我们网络中的长期护理从业者一起准备研究结果,包括确定的障碍,以确定如何解决实际应用方法的变化。这种对话可以作为一个基础,让患有痴呆症的人参与讨论在研究他们对建筑环境的观点时突出的障碍。范围综述的结果将在学术和非学术期刊以及学术会议上报告。