• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体间联想视觉学习的变异性:反应特征的探索、描述和划分。

Interindividual variations in associative visual learning: Exploration, description, and partition of response characteristics.

机构信息

Brain Electrophysiology Attention Movement Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Geopolis Quartier Mouline, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4643-4660. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02208-z. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-023-02208-z
PMID:37620746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11289025/
Abstract

Relying on existing literature to identify suitable techniques for characterizing individual differences presents practical and methodological challenges. These challenges include the frequent absence of detailed descriptions of raw data, which hinders the assessment of analysis appropriateness, as well as the exclusion of data points deemed outliers, or the reliance on comparing only extreme groups by categorizing continuous variables into upper and lower quartiles. Despite the availability of algorithmic modeling in standard statistical software, investigations into individual differences predominantly focus on factor analysis and parametric tests. To address these limitations, this application-oriented study proposes a comprehensive approach that leverages behavioral responses through the use of signal detection theory and clustering techniques. Unlike conventional methods, signal detection theory considers both sensitivity and bias, offering insights into the intricate interplay between perceptual ability and decision-making processes. On the other hand, clustering techniques enable the identification and classification of distinct patterns within the dataset, allowing for the detection of singular behaviors that form the foundation of individual differences. In a broader framework, these combined approaches prove particularly advantageous when analyzing large and heterogeneous datasets provided by data archive platforms. By applying these techniques more widely, our understanding of the cognitive and behavioral processes underlying learning can be expedited and enhanced.

摘要

依靠现有文献来确定适合的技术来描述个体差异存在实际和方法学上的挑战。这些挑战包括频繁缺乏原始数据的详细描述,这阻碍了对分析适当性的评估,以及排除被认为是异常值的数据点,或者通过将连续变量划分为四分位数来仅比较极端组。尽管标准统计软件中提供了算法建模,但个体差异的研究主要集中在因子分析和参数检验上。为了解决这些限制,本面向应用的研究提出了一种综合方法,通过使用信号检测理论和聚类技术来利用行为反应。与传统方法不同,信号检测理论同时考虑了敏感性和偏差,深入了解感知能力和决策过程之间的复杂相互作用。另一方面,聚类技术能够识别和分类数据集中的不同模式,从而检测形成个体差异基础的单一行为。在更广泛的框架中,当分析数据档案平台提供的大型和异构数据集时,这些组合方法被证明特别有利。通过更广泛地应用这些技术,可以加速和增强我们对学习背后的认知和行为过程的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/91435352581f/13428_2023_2208_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/05937fcb3268/13428_2023_2208_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/14588d7c9c05/13428_2023_2208_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/eb2cc0c0b93a/13428_2023_2208_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/8c59343bff50/13428_2023_2208_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/305ac8cfae60/13428_2023_2208_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/9ca12dcb5708/13428_2023_2208_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/fc424fa24a67/13428_2023_2208_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/6b23638f5a11/13428_2023_2208_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/f7e3bbd7c3ce/13428_2023_2208_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/91435352581f/13428_2023_2208_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/05937fcb3268/13428_2023_2208_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/14588d7c9c05/13428_2023_2208_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/eb2cc0c0b93a/13428_2023_2208_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/8c59343bff50/13428_2023_2208_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/305ac8cfae60/13428_2023_2208_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/9ca12dcb5708/13428_2023_2208_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/fc424fa24a67/13428_2023_2208_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/6b23638f5a11/13428_2023_2208_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/f7e3bbd7c3ce/13428_2023_2208_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8bd/11289025/91435352581f/13428_2023_2208_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Interindividual variations in associative visual learning: Exploration, description, and partition of response characteristics.个体间联想视觉学习的变异性:反应特征的探索、描述和划分。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4643-4660. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02208-z. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Perceptual learning effect on decision and confidence thresholds.知觉学习对决策和信心阈值的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Oct;45:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
4
Dynamic functional connectivity shapes individual differences in associative learning.动态功能连接塑造了联想学习中的个体差异。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):3911-3928. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23285.
5
Contribution of Sensory Encoding to Measured Bias.感觉编码对测量偏差的贡献。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jun 26;39(26):5115-5127. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0076-19.2019. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
6
Distinguishing bias from sensitivity effects in multialternative detection tasks.在多选项检测任务中区分偏差与敏感性效应。
J Vis. 2014 Aug 21;14(9):16. doi: 10.1167/14.9.16.
7
Separating decision and encoding noise in signal detection tasks.在信号检测任务中分离决策和编码噪声。
Psychol Rev. 2015 Jul;122(3):429-60. doi: 10.1037/a0039348.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Visual Perceptual Learning and Models.视觉感知学习与模型。
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017 Sep 15;3:343-363. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061249. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning.推理过程中冲突检测的个体差异。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 May;71(5):1188-1208. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1313283. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrocortical correlates of attention differentiate individual capacity in associative learning.注意力的皮层电活动关联可区分联想学习中的个体能力。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Mar 18;9(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00236-8.

本文引用的文献

1
The forgotten history of signal detection theory.信号检测理论的遗忘历史。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Feb;46(2):201-233. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000732. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
3
Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.在心理学中选择预测而不是解释:来自机器学习的教训。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1100-1122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617693393. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
4
Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.工作记忆容量与反眼跳任务:目标激活与维持个体差异的微观分析-宏观分析研究
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):68-84. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000431. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Individual differences in working memory capacity predict learned control over attentional capture.工作记忆容量的个体差异预测了对注意力捕获的习得控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Nov;43(11):1912-1924. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000419. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
6
Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.注意力、记忆和思维执行控制方面的个体差异及其与精神分裂症相关特征的关联。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Aug;145(8):1017-1048. doi: 10.1037/xge0000184. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.视觉工作记忆容量:从心理物理学和神经生物学到个体差异。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Working memory capacity and categorization: individual differences and modeling.工作记忆容量与分类:个体差异与建模。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 May;37(3):720-38. doi: 10.1037/a0022639.
9
The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition.人类行为和认知个体间差异的结构基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Apr;12(4):231-42. doi: 10.1038/nrn3000. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
10
K-means clustering: a half-century synthesis.K均值聚类:半个世纪的综述
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2006 May;59(Pt 1):1-34. doi: 10.1348/000711005X48266.