• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口吃作为韵律障碍的研究。

Studies in stuttering as a prosodic disturbance.

作者信息

Bergmann G

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1986 Sep;29(3):290-300. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2903.290.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2903.290
PMID:3762093
Abstract

In two experiments, various aspects of prosody in adult male stutterers and nonstutterers were studied. The results showed that stutterers did not speak with a generally reduced pitch pattern, they were able to place sentence accent correctly but had difficulty executing this prosodic feature, stuttering episodes were located mainly on stressed syllables, a fixed timing pattern of speech enhanced fluency, and the intervals between stressed syllables were more variable in the speech of stutterers, even in symptom-free passages, than in the speech of nonstutterers. Results support the conclusion that stuttering, seen on the symptomatic level of disfluencies produced, is a prosodic disturbance.

摘要

在两项实验中,对成年男性口吃者和非口吃者韵律的各个方面进行了研究。结果表明,口吃者并非普遍采用降低的音高模式说话,他们能够正确地放置句子重音,但在执行这种韵律特征时存在困难,口吃发作主要出现在重读音节上,固定的言语节奏模式可提高流畅性,并且与非口吃者的言语相比,口吃者的言语中重读音节之间的间隔变化更大,即使在无症状的段落中也是如此。结果支持这样的结论,即从产生不流畅的症状层面来看,口吃是一种韵律障碍。

相似文献

1
Studies in stuttering as a prosodic disturbance.口吃作为韵律障碍的研究。
J Speech Hear Res. 1986 Sep;29(3):290-300. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2903.290.
2
Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers.非口吃者和口吃者对基频和语速的自发模仿。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1997 Jul;26(4):425-48. doi: 10.1023/a:1025030120016.
3
Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.口吃儿童和成人与非口吃儿童和成人之间的默读和阅读速度差异。
J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Dec;33(4):776-85. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3304.776.
4
Speech-related reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers: diagnostic implications.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1990 May;55(2):295-9. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5502.295.
5
Acoustic and physiological reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers.口吃者与非口吃者的听觉及生理反应时间。
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Sep;32(3):668-80. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3203.668.
6
Speech shadowing characteristics of stutterers under diotic and dichotic conditions.口吃者在双耳同时听觉和双耳分听条件下的言语跟读特征。
J Commun Disord. 1987 Dec;20(6):493-506. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(87)90036-0.
7
Vowel duration and voice onset time for stressed and nonstressed syllables in stutterers under delayed auditory feedback condition.延迟听觉反馈条件下口吃者重读和非重读音节的元音时长及嗓音起始时间。
Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1989;41(1):30-42. doi: 10.1159/000265930.
8
Temporal-phonemic processing skills in adult stutterers and nonstutterers.成年口吃者和非口吃者的颞部音素加工技能。
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Jun;32(2):274-80. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3202.274.
9
The effects of delayed auditory feedback and masking on the fundamental frequency of stutterers and nonstutterers.
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Jun;22(2):343-53. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2202.343.
10
Coordination of aerodynamic and phonatory processes in fluent speech utterances of stutterers.口吃者流畅言语发声中空气动力学与发声过程的协调
J Speech Hear Res. 1988 Sep;31(3):352-61. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3103.352.

引用本文的文献

1
Reading Fluency in Children and Adolescents Who Stutter.口吃儿童和青少年的阅读流畅性
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 30;11(12):1595. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121595.
2
Adults who stutter and metronome synchronization: evidence for a nonspeech timing deficit.口吃成年人与节拍器同步:非言语计时缺陷的证据。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Aug;1449(1):56-69. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14117. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
Timing variability of sensorimotor integration during vocalization in individuals who stutter.口吃者发声时感觉运动整合的时变特征。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):16340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34517-1.
4
Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers.非口吃者和口吃者对基频和语速的自发模仿。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1997 Jul;26(4):425-48. doi: 10.1023/a:1025030120016.