• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择最佳质子笔形束扫描计划参数以减少离散点扫描计划与连续扫描之间的剂量差异:一项概念验证研究。

Selecting Optimal Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Plan Parameters to Reduce Dose Discrepancy between Discrete Spot Plan and Continuous Scanning: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

作者信息

Liang Xiaoying, Beltran Chris J, Liu Chunbo, Park Chunjoo, Lu Bo, Yaddanapudi Sridhar, Tan Jun, Furutani Keith M

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 13;15(16):4084. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164084.

DOI:10.3390/cancers15164084
PMID:37627112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10452710/
Abstract

Pencil beam scanning delivered with continuous scanning has several advantages over conventional discrete spot scanning. Such advantages include improved beam delivery efficiency and reduced beam delivery time. However, a move dose is delivered between consecutive spots with continuous scanning, and current treatment planning systems do not take this into account. Therefore, continuous scanning and discrete spot plans have an inherent dose discrepancy. Using the operating parameters of the state-of-the-art particle therapy system, we conducted a proof-of-concept study in which we systematically generated 28 plans for cubic targets with different combinations of plan parameters and simulated the dose discrepancies between continuous scanning and a planned one. A nomograph to guide the selection of plan parameters was developed to reduce the dose discrepancy. The effectiveness of the nomograph was evaluated with two clinical cases (one prostate and one liver). Plans with parameters guided by the nomograph decreased dose discrepancy than those used standard plan parameters. Specifically, the 2%/2 mm gamma passing rate increased from 96.3% to 100% for the prostate case and from 97.8% to 99.7% for the liver case. The CTV DVH root mean square error decreased from 2.2% to 0.2% for the prostate case and from 1.8% to 0.9% for the liver case. The decreased dose discrepancy may allow the relaxing of the delivery constraint for some cases, leading to greater benefits in continuous scanning. Further investigation is warranted.

摘要

连续扫描的笔形束扫描相对于传统的离散点扫描具有多个优点。这些优点包括提高射束传输效率和减少射束传输时间。然而,连续扫描在连续的点之间会传递移动剂量,而当前的治疗计划系统并未考虑到这一点。因此,连续扫描和离散点计划存在固有的剂量差异。利用最先进的粒子治疗系统的运行参数,我们进行了一项概念验证研究,在该研究中,我们系统地为立方靶标生成了28个具有不同计划参数组合的计划,并模拟了连续扫描与计划扫描之间的剂量差异。开发了一种用于指导计划参数选择的列线图,以减少剂量差异。通过两个临床病例(一个前列腺病例和一个肝脏病例)评估了列线图的有效性。由列线图指导参数的计划比使用标准计划参数的计划减少了剂量差异。具体而言,前列腺病例的2%/2毫米伽马通过率从96.3%提高到100%,肝脏病例从97.8%提高到99.7%。前列腺病例的CTV剂量体积直方图均方根误差从2.2%降至0.2%,肝脏病例从1.8%降至0.9%。剂量差异的降低可能会使某些病例的传输约束得到放宽,从而在连续扫描中带来更大的益处。有必要进行进一步的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/63f538b195e9/cancers-15-04084-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/6a711cc69191/cancers-15-04084-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/5fda435278db/cancers-15-04084-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/83aca3376c08/cancers-15-04084-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/63f538b195e9/cancers-15-04084-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/6a711cc69191/cancers-15-04084-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/5fda435278db/cancers-15-04084-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/83aca3376c08/cancers-15-04084-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf09/10452710/63f538b195e9/cancers-15-04084-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Selecting Optimal Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Plan Parameters to Reduce Dose Discrepancy between Discrete Spot Plan and Continuous Scanning: A Proof-of-Concept Study.选择最佳质子笔形束扫描计划参数以减少离散点扫描计划与连续扫描之间的剂量差异:一项概念验证研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 13;15(16):4084. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164084.
2
Technical note: Delivery benefit and dosimetric implication of synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning using continuous scanning mode.技术说明:基于同步加速器的质子铅笔束扫描连续扫描模式的传递获益和剂量学影响。
Med Phys. 2023 Aug;50(8):5252-5261. doi: 10.1002/mp.16434. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.两种方法用于最小化同步加速器基离散点扫描质子束中延迟电荷对所输送剂量影响的比较。
Med Phys. 2014 Aug;41(8):081703. doi: 10.1118/1.4885961.
4
Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions.通过不均匀的每日剂量分布最大化扫描束递送的质子剂量的生物学效应。
Med Phys. 2013 May;40(5):051708. doi: 10.1118/1.4801897.
5
Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning.铅笔束扫描治疗计划中斑点参数的影响。
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):60-73. doi: 10.1002/mp.12675. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
6
Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.超高能电子束放射治疗的治疗计划以及超高能电子束与容积调强弧形治疗计划的比较。
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2615-25. doi: 10.1118/1.4918923.
7
Investigation of scan path optimization in improving proton pencil beam scanning continuous delivery.用于改善质子笔形束扫描连续输送的扫描路径优化研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 Sep 27;68(19). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf98e.
8
Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.小光斑与大光斑:在笔形束扫描质子治疗肺癌中对计划质量的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Feb;23(2):e13512. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13512. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Investigation of beam delivery time for synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning system with novel scanning mode.基于同步加速器的新型扫描模式质子铅笔束扫描系统的束传输时间研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Aug 17;67(17). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8410.
10
A machine learning-based framework for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning using irradiation log-files.基于机器学习的质子铅笔束扫描递送误差预测框架,使用辐照日志文件。
Phys Med. 2020 Oct;78:179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dosimetric evaluation and clinical application of collimated apertures with proton beam line scanning in stereotactic radiotherapy.立体定向放射治疗中质子束线扫描准直孔径的剂量学评估及临床应用
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70128. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70128. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Optimal minimum MU for intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning proton beams.调强质子治疗中使用笔形束扫描质子束的最优最小 MU。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Sep;25(9):e14435. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14435. Epub 2024 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Technical note: Delivery benefit and dosimetric implication of synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning using continuous scanning mode.技术说明:基于同步加速器的质子铅笔束扫描连续扫描模式的传递获益和剂量学影响。
Med Phys. 2023 Aug;50(8):5252-5261. doi: 10.1002/mp.16434. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
2
A Review of Proton Therapy - Current Status and Future Directions.质子治疗综述——现状与未来方向
Precis Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jun;6(2):164-176. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1149. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
Investigation of beam delivery time for synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning system with novel scanning mode.
基于同步加速器的新型扫描模式质子铅笔束扫描系统的束传输时间研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Aug 17;67(17). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8410.
4
Commissioning a newly developed treatment planning system, VQA Plan, for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams.委托开发一种新的治疗计划系统,VQA Plan,用于碳离子束的快速光栅扫描。
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268087. eCollection 2022.
5
Proton Therapy for Pediatric Ependymoma: Mature Results From a Bicentric Study.质子治疗儿童室管膜瘤:来自双中心研究的成熟结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Jul 1;110(3):815-820. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.027. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Technical Note: Integrating an open source Monte Carlo code "MCsquare" for clinical use in intensity-modulated proton therapy.技术说明:将开源蒙特卡罗代码“MCsquare”集成用于调强质子治疗的临床应用。
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(6):2558-2574. doi: 10.1002/mp.14125. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Carbon Ion Therapy: A Modern Review of an Emerging Technology.碳离子疗法:一项新兴技术的现代综述
Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 4;10:82. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00082. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Proton vs Photon Therapy as Part of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cancer.质子与光子放疗联合同步化疗治疗局部晚期癌症的疗效比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):237-246. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4889.
9
Development of Clinical Programs for Carbon Ion Beam Therapy at MedAustron.奥地利 MedAustron 碳离子束治疗临床项目的发展
Int J Part Ther. 2016 Winter;2(3):474-477. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-15-00022.1. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
10
Paediatric proton therapy.儿科质子治疗。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Mar;93(1107):20190601. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190601. Epub 2019 Sep 19.