• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创牙科对儿科患者报告结局和基于观察的结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

The Impact of Minimal Intervention Dentistry on Patient-Reported and Observation-Based Outcomes in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Chiu Hilton Hiu Chun, Lam Phoebe Pui Ying, Yiu Cynthia Kar Yung

机构信息

Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;11(16):2241. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162241.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11162241
PMID:37628440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10454713/
Abstract

This review aimed to systematically investigate the effect of minimal intervention dentistry on patient-reported and observation-based outcomes of anxiety, pain and patient cooperation in the pediatric population. Microinvasive treatments (MITs) were compared to conventional treatments, home-based and professionally applied non-invasive treatments (NITs), and between MITs. Two reviewers independently screened studies from four electronic databases, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach. Ultimately, 26 studies were included for qualitative synthesis, with the data from 12 studies being incorporated into the meta-analysis. No statistically significantly differences in terms of anxiety were noted between MITs and conventional treatments, or between MITs from the meta-analyses. The treatment durations of MITs were not necessarily shorter than conventional treatments but varied with the use of local anesthesia, behavioral and clinical approach, and other confounding factors. The certainties of evidence were deemed low due to high risk of bias of the included studies. NITs evoked less anxiety and pain compared to MITs. Minimal intervention dentistry is an alternative treatment to manage dental caries among children and does not arouse different levels of dental anxiety and pain compared to other treatment modalities. However, further well-designed studies are required to draw an evidence-based conclusion.

摘要

本综述旨在系统研究微创牙科对儿童患者报告的焦虑、疼痛及患者合作情况的观察结果的影响。将微创治疗(MITs)与传统治疗、家庭式和专业应用的非侵入性治疗(NITs)以及不同的MITs进行比较。两名评审员独立从四个电子数据库中筛选研究,提取数据,采用GRADE方法评估偏倚风险和证据确定性。最终,纳入26项研究进行定性综合分析,其中12项研究的数据纳入荟萃分析。荟萃分析结果显示,MITs与传统治疗之间或不同MITs之间在焦虑方面未发现统计学显著差异。MITs的治疗时间不一定比传统治疗短,而是因局部麻醉的使用、行为和临床方法以及其他混杂因素而有所不同。由于纳入研究的偏倚风险高,证据确定性被认为较低。与MITs相比,NITs引起的焦虑和疼痛更少。微创牙科是治疗儿童龋齿的一种替代疗法,与其他治疗方式相比,不会引起不同程度的牙科焦虑和疼痛。然而,需要进一步设计良好的研究来得出基于证据的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/58ddffb6b744/healthcare-11-02241-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/22f0b9d0196f/healthcare-11-02241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/fc6eb672fd0f/healthcare-11-02241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/ec8ca86fde45/healthcare-11-02241-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/5d011be838d5/healthcare-11-02241-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/b35aa23b8439/healthcare-11-02241-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/58ddffb6b744/healthcare-11-02241-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/22f0b9d0196f/healthcare-11-02241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/fc6eb672fd0f/healthcare-11-02241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/ec8ca86fde45/healthcare-11-02241-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/5d011be838d5/healthcare-11-02241-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/b35aa23b8439/healthcare-11-02241-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf3/10454713/58ddffb6b744/healthcare-11-02241-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Minimal Intervention Dentistry on Patient-Reported and Observation-Based Outcomes in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创牙科对儿科患者报告结局和基于观察的结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;11(16):2241. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162241.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
4
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂与氟化物涂剂对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;11(11):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub5.
5
Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment.提高接受牙科治疗的儿童和青少年对局部麻醉剂接受度的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD011024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011024.pub2.
6
Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.龋齿的非修复性治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Dent Res. 2019 Jan;98(1):14-26. doi: 10.1177/0022034518800014. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer.音乐干预对改善癌症患者心理和生理结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Exploring the cost-effectiveness of child dental caries prevention programmes. Are we comparing apples and oranges?探索儿童龋齿预防项目的成本效益。我们是在进行不恰当的比较吗?
Evid Based Dent. 2020 Mar;21(1):5-7. doi: 10.1038/s41432-020-0085-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of the Hall Technique on Patient Cooperation: A Retrospective Analysis.霍尔技术对患者合作的影响:一项回顾性分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 7;14(2):304. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020304.
2
Minimal intervention dentistry: What is its clinical application and effectiveness in different continents? - A scoping review.微创牙科:其在不同大洲的临床应用及效果如何?——一项范围综述
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Feb;27(2):134-139. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_274_23. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment time, pain experience and acceptability of the technique for caries removal in primary teeth using the ART approach with or without Brix3000™ papain gel: a preliminary randomised controlled clinical trial.使用或不使用Brix3000™木瓜蛋白酶凝胶的非创伤性修复治疗(ART)方法对乳牙龋齿进行治疗的时间、疼痛体验及该技术的可接受性:一项初步随机对照临床试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Oct;23(5):777-785. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00669-4. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
2
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.治疗龋坏或牙本质龋损的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars; 36-month follow-up of a randomised control trial in a school setting.在学校环境中进行的一项随机对照试验的 36 个月随访结果显示,对于乳磨牙的近中-颌面龋损,使用非创伤性修复治疗(ART)与 Hall 技术相比。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01298-x.
5
Success and Behavior During Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, the Hall Technique, and the Stainless Steel Crown Technique for Primary Molar Teeth.乳牙非创伤性修复治疗、霍尔技术和不锈钢冠技术的成功率及治疗表现
Pediatr Dent. 2020 May 15;42(3):187-192.
6
Dental Fear and Anxiety of Kindergarten Children in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study.香港幼儿园儿童的牙齿恐惧和焦虑:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 20;17(8):2827. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082827.
7
An Introduction to Assessing Dental Fear and Anxiety in Children.儿童牙科恐惧与焦虑评估导论。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Apr 4;8(2):86. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020086.
8
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
9
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
10
Efficacy of 30% silver diamine fluoride compared to atraumatic restorative treatment on dentine caries arrestment in primary molars of preschool children: A 12-months parallel randomized controlled clinical trial.30% 氟化银氨溶液对比非创伤性修复治疗对学龄前儿童乳磨牙牙本质龋的疗效:一项为期 12 个月的平行随机对照临床试验。
J Dent. 2019 Sep;88:103165. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 4.