• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CaFANet:物联网中用于设备故障预测的因果因素感知注意力网络

CaFANet: Causal-Factors-Aware Attention Networks for Equipment Fault Prediction in the Internet of Things.

作者信息

Gui Zhenwen, He Shuaishuai, Lin Yao, Nan Xin, Yin Xiaoyan, Wu Chase Q

机构信息

The 7th Rescarch Institute of Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Guangzhou 510310, China.

School of Information Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;23(16):7040. doi: 10.3390/s23167040.

DOI:10.3390/s23167040
PMID:37631576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10459481/
Abstract

Existing fault prediction algorithms based on deep learning have achieved good prediction performance. These algorithms treat all features fairly and assume that the progression of the equipment faults is stationary throughout the entire lifecycle. In fact, each feature has a different contribution to the accuracy of fault prediction, and the progress of equipment faults is non-stationary. More specifically, capturing the time point at which a fault first appears is more important for improving the accuracy of fault prediction. Moreover, the progress of the different faults of equipment varies significantly. Therefore, taking feature differences and time information into consideration, we propose a usal-actors-ware Attention work, , for equipment fault prediction in the Internet of Things. Experimental results and performance analysis confirm the superiority of the proposed algorithm over traditional machine learning methods with prediction accuracy improved by up to 15.3%.

摘要

现有的基于深度学习的故障预测算法已经取得了良好的预测性能。这些算法平等对待所有特征,并假设设备故障在整个生命周期内的发展是平稳的。事实上,每个特征对故障预测的准确性贡献不同,而且设备故障的发展是不平稳的。更具体地说,捕捉故障首次出现的时间点对于提高故障预测的准确性更为重要。此外,设备不同故障的发展差异很大。因此,考虑到特征差异和时间信息,我们提出了一种用于物联网中设备故障预测的通用行为感知注意力模型。实验结果和性能分析证实了所提算法优于传统机器学习方法,预测准确率提高了15.3%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/a9ac13c62b7c/sensors-23-07040-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/fe8cf58ec5c9/sensors-23-07040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/264adc95bac3/sensors-23-07040-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/138917510882/sensors-23-07040-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/a8514e3fea2b/sensors-23-07040-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/52f0e3dbdf03/sensors-23-07040-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/a9ac13c62b7c/sensors-23-07040-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/fe8cf58ec5c9/sensors-23-07040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/264adc95bac3/sensors-23-07040-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/138917510882/sensors-23-07040-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/a8514e3fea2b/sensors-23-07040-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/52f0e3dbdf03/sensors-23-07040-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504e/10459481/a9ac13c62b7c/sensors-23-07040-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
CaFANet: Causal-Factors-Aware Attention Networks for Equipment Fault Prediction in the Internet of Things.CaFANet:物联网中用于设备故障预测的因果因素感知注意力网络
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;23(16):7040. doi: 10.3390/s23167040.
2
Multi-Modal Learning-Based Equipment Fault Prediction in the Internet of Things.基于多模态学习的物联网设备故障预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;22(18):6722. doi: 10.3390/s22186722.
3
Application of Fault Tree Analysis and Fuzzy Neural Networks to Fault Diagnosis in the Internet of Things (IoT) for Aquaculture.故障树分析与模糊神经网络在水产养殖物联网故障诊断中的应用
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 14;17(1):153. doi: 10.3390/s17010153.
4
A Study on the Fault Location of Secondary Equipment in Smart Substation Based on the Graph Attention Network.基于图注意力网络的智能变电站二次设备故障定位研究
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 24;23(23):9384. doi: 10.3390/s23239384.
5
Research on Fault Detection by Flow Sequence for Industrial Internet of Things in Sewage Treatment Plant Case.污水处理厂案例中基于流量序列的工业物联网故障检测研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;24(7):2210. doi: 10.3390/s24072210.
6
A Fault Prediction and Cause Identification Approach in Complex Industrial Processes Based on Deep Learning.一种基于深度学习的复杂工业过程故障预测与原因识别方法。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Mar 5;2021:6612342. doi: 10.1155/2021/6612342. eCollection 2021.
7
Integrated Edge Deployable Fault Diagnostic Algorithm for the Internet of Things (IoT): A Methane Sensing Application.物联网(IoT)的集成边缘可部署故障诊断算法:甲烷传感应用
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 10;23(14):6266. doi: 10.3390/s23146266.
8
A Deep Generative Model with Multiscale Features Enabled Industrial Internet of Things for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Bearings.一种具有多尺度特征的深度生成模型助力工业物联网实现轴承智能故障诊断
Research (Wash D C). 2023 Jul 7;6:0176. doi: 10.34133/research.0176. eCollection 2023.
9
Application Combining VMD and ResNet101 in Intelligent Diagnosis of Motor Faults.应用 VMD 和 ResNet101 于电机故障智能诊断。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 10;21(18):6065. doi: 10.3390/s21186065.
10
Health Evaluation and Fault Diagnosis of Medical Imaging Equipment Based on Neural Network Algorithm.基于神经网络算法的医学影像设备健康评估与故障诊断。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Sep 4;2021:6092461. doi: 10.1155/2021/6092461. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-Modal Learning-Based Equipment Fault Prediction in the Internet of Things.基于多模态学习的物联网设备故障预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;22(18):6722. doi: 10.3390/s22186722.
2
Deep Hybrid 2-D-3-D CNN Based on Dual Second-Order Attention With Camera Spectral Sensitivity Prior for Spectral Super-Resolution.基于双通道二阶注意力和相机光谱灵敏度先验的深度混合 2-D-3-D CNN 用于光谱超分辨率。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2023 Feb;34(2):623-634. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3098767. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
3
Long short-term memory.长短期记忆
Neural Comput. 1997 Nov 15;9(8):1735-80. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.