• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“直接告诉我们!”:对美国中西部农村肺癌幸存者及其照护者的生存护理经历进行的质性分析

"Just give it to us straight!": a qualitative analysis of midwestern rural lung cancer survivors and caregivers about survivorship care experiences.

作者信息

Keimweiss Samuel, Gurolnick Anna, Grant Shakira, Burris Jessica, Studts Jamie, Lewis-Thames Marquita

机构信息

Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb;19(1):21-34. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01445-7. Epub 2023 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11764-023-01445-7
PMID:37632652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10895068/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the experiences of rural lung cancer survivors and caregivers to understand and identify barriers to posttreatment survivorship care management.

METHODS

From May 2021 to June 2022, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposively sampled cohort. Participants were either posttreatment lung cancer survivors (within 5 years of their last active treatment) or caregivers of a lung cancer survivor. Interviews probed participants regarding survivorship care knowledge, implementation, and navigation. Two analysts inductively coded verbatim transcripts and conducted a thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed N = 21 participants: lung cancer survivors (76%) and caregivers (24%). Participants self-identified as Non-Hispanic White (100%), were at least 65 years old (77%), identified as male (62%), and previously smoked ≥ 5 packs over the lifetime (71%). The perspectives of survivors and caregivers were similar; thus, we analyzed them together. Themes related to survivorship care included (1) frustrations and uncertainty regarding unexpected barriers, (2) strategies to improve the delivery of posttreatment information, (3) strategies to remain positive and respond to emotional concerns of survivorship care, and (4) the impact of engaging and patient-centered care teams.

CONCLUSION

Given the limited access to lung cancer care resources in rural communities, our findings reveal that following a survivorship care program or plan requires a high level of individual resilience and community/interpersonal networking.

IMPLICATIONS FOR SURVIVORS

This study's findings can be applied to improve practice-based care for rural posttreatment lung cancer survivors and provide an impetus for developing tools to assist patient navigation toward community-based supportive care and care management resources.

摘要

目的

我们评估了农村肺癌幸存者及其护理人员的经历,以了解和确定治疗后生存护理管理的障碍。

方法

2021年5月至2022年6月,我们对一个有目的抽样的队列进行了半结构化访谈。参与者为治疗后的肺癌幸存者(在其最后一次积极治疗的5年内)或肺癌幸存者的护理人员。访谈探讨了参与者关于生存护理知识、实施和导航的情况。两名分析人员对逐字记录进行归纳编码并进行了主题分析。

结果

我们采访了N = 21名参与者:肺癌幸存者(76%)和护理人员(24%)。参与者自我认定为非西班牙裔白人(100%),年龄至少65岁(77%),男性(62%),且一生中吸烟≥5包(71%)。幸存者和护理人员的观点相似;因此,我们将他们一起分析。与生存护理相关的主题包括:(1)对意外障碍的挫败感和不确定性;(2)改善治疗后信息传递的策略;(3)保持积极态度并应对生存护理情感问题的策略;(4)参与性和以患者为中心的护理团队的影响。

结论

鉴于农村社区肺癌护理资源有限,我们的研究结果表明,遵循生存护理计划需要高度的个人适应能力和社区/人际网络。

对幸存者的启示

本研究结果可应用于改善农村治疗后肺癌幸存者基于实践的护理,并为开发工具提供动力,以帮助患者找到社区支持性护理和护理管理资源。

相似文献

1
"Just give it to us straight!": a qualitative analysis of midwestern rural lung cancer survivors and caregivers about survivorship care experiences.“直接告诉我们!”:对美国中西部农村肺癌幸存者及其照护者的生存护理经历进行的质性分析
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb;19(1):21-34. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01445-7. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
4
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
"A System That Wasn't Really Optimized for Me": Factors Influencing Autistic University Students' Access to Information.“一个并非真正为我优化的系统”:影响自闭症大学生获取信息的因素
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):171-184. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0139. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
Staying afloat on a realm of shifting sands: carers navigating palliative care in their rural settings.在变幻莫测的领域中保持不沉:农村地区的护理人员在姑息治疗中艰难前行。
Rural Remote Health. 2025 Jul;25(3):9343. doi: 10.22605/RRH9343. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
8
Development of a Mobile App to Support Head and Neck Cancer Caregiving: Mixed Methods Study.开发一款支持头颈癌护理的移动应用程序:混合方法研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 10;11:e66471. doi: 10.2196/66471.
9
Oncology Provider and Patient Perspectives on a Cardiovascular Health Assessment Tool Used During Posttreatment Survivorship Care in Community Oncology (Results from WF-1804CD): Mixed Methods Observational Study.肿瘤学提供者与患者对社区肿瘤治疗后生存护理期间使用的心血管健康评估工具的看法(WF-1804CD研究结果):混合方法观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 6;27:e65152. doi: 10.2196/65152.
10
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of community health workers in a collaborative care management intervention for cancer pain management: a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.社区卫生工作者在癌症疼痛管理协作护理管理干预中的作用:一项随机对照试验的可行性研究
Ann Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;14(1):13-28. doi: 10.21037/apm-24-125.
2
Implementation and Retrospective Examination of a Lung Cancer Survivorship Clinic in a Comprehensive Cancer Center.综合癌症中心肺癌幸存者诊所的实施与回顾性研究
Clin Lung Cancer. 2025 Jan;26(1):e41-e54. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Echoes of Support: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Caregiver Narratives in Lung Cancer Care.支持的回响:肺癌护理中照顾者叙事的定性元综合分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 14;12(8):828. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080828.

本文引用的文献

1
"Double whammy": a rapid review of rural vs urban psychosocial cancer experiences and telehealth service in five countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.“双重打击”:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对五个国家的农村与城市心理社会癌症经历和远程医疗服务进行的快速综述。
PeerJ. 2022 Nov 22;10:e14382. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14382. eCollection 2022.
2
Tobacco use among Appalachian adolescents: An urgent need for virtual scale out of effective interventions.阿巴拉契亚青少年的烟草使用情况:迫切需要通过虚拟方式推广有效干预措施。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2022 Nov 4;8:39. doi: 10.18332/tpc/155331. eCollection 2022.
3
Economic Perspective of Cancer Care and Its Consequences for Vulnerable Groups.癌症护理的经济视角及其对弱势群体的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;14(13):3158. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133158.
4
Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors Associated With Radiation Treatment Nonadherence and Survival Among Rural and Nonrural Patients With Cancer.社会人口学和临床因素与农村和非农村癌症患者放疗不依从和生存的关系。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 May 1;116(1):28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.075. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Cancer disparities in the context of rurality: risk factors and screening across various U.S. rural classification codes.农村背景下的癌症差异:美国各种农村分类代码中的风险因素和筛查。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Aug;33(8):1095-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01599-2. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022.2022 年癌症治疗和生存统计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Sep;72(5):409-436. doi: 10.3322/caac.21731. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Self-reliance, Social Norms, and Self-stigma as Barriers to Psychosocial Help-Seeking Among Rural Cancer Survivors With Cancer-Related Distress: Qualitative Interview Study.自我依赖、社会规范和自我污名化:农村癌症幸存者在面临与癌症相关困扰时寻求心理社会帮助的障碍——定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 19;6(5):e33262. doi: 10.2196/33262.
8
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Rural-Urban Trends in 5-Year Survival of Patients With Lung, Prostate, Breast, and Colorectal Cancers: 1975-2011 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER).农村-城市地区肺癌、前列腺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者 5 年生存率的城乡趋势的种族和民族差异:1975-2011 年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212246. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12246.
9
Benefits of and barriers to telehealth for the informal caregivers of elderly individuals in rural areas: A scoping review.远程医疗对农村地区老年个体非正式照护者的益处和障碍:范围综述。
Aust J Rural Health. 2022 Aug;30(4):442-457. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12869. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
10
Consequences of Structural Urbanism: Urban-Rural Differences in Cancer Patients' Use and Perceived Importance of Supportive Care Services from a 2017-2018 Midwestern Survey.结构主义城市规划的后果:2017-2018 年中西部调查中癌症患者对支持性护理服务的使用和感知重要性的城乡差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;19(6):3405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063405.