College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 29;14(7):e081594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081594.
This study aimed to assess the economic efficiency of the acute medical unit (AMU) hospitalist care model, utilising patient outcomes (length of hospital stay, emergency department (ED)-length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality) from a previous investigation.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using benefit-cost analysis from a societal perspective. Data relating to clinical factors, outcomes and medical costs were obtained from the electronic medical record database at our institution. Literature-based costing was applied to determine direct non-medical costs and indirect costs that could not be obtained directly.
A tertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea.
We evaluated 6391 medical inpatients admitted through the ED from 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2017.
The study compared multiple types of costs and benefits among inpatients from the ED between a non-hospitalist group and an AMU hospitalist group. This investigation found a significant reduction in medical costs and total costs in the AMU hospitalist group compared to the non-hospitalist group (30% reduction, 95% CI: 27.6-32.1%, =0.000; 29.3% reduction, 95% CI: 27.0-31.5%, =0.000; respectively). Furthermore, significant reductions in direct and indirect costs were found in the AMU hospitalist group compared to the non-hospitalist group (28.6% reduction, 95% CI: 26.6-30.5%, =0.000; 23.3% reduction, 95% CI: 20.9-25.5%, =0.000; respectively). The net-benefit and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of the AMU hospitalist care group were US $6846 and 1.33 per patient admission, respectively.
The AMU hospitalist care model was associated with remarkable reductions in multiple costs. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that the net-benefit estimates of AMU hospitalist care were similar to the baseline estimates. Thus, the overall net-benefit of AMU hospitalist care was found to be largely positive.
本研究旨在利用先前调查中患者结局(住院时间、急诊部-住院时间、院内死亡率)评估急症医学部(AMU)医院医师照护模式的经济效益。
本研究为从社会角度进行的回顾性队列研究,采用受益成本分析。从我院电子病历数据库中获取与临床因素、结局和医疗成本相关的数据。应用文献基础成本法确定无法直接获得的直接非医疗成本和间接成本。
韩国一家三级护理医院。
我们评估了 2016 年 6 月 1 日至 2017 年 5 月 31 日期间通过急诊部收治的 6391 名住院患者。
该研究比较了 ED 住院患者在非医院医师组和 AMU 医院医师组之间的多种类型的成本和效益。结果发现 AMU 医院医师组与非医院医师组相比,医疗费用和总费用显著降低(降低 30%,95%CI:27.6-32.1%,=0.000;降低 29.3%,95%CI:27.0-31.5%,=0.000;分别)。此外,AMU 医院医师组的直接和间接成本也显著低于非医院医师组(降低 28.6%,95%CI:26.6-30.5%,=0.000;降低 23.3%,95%CI:20.9-25.5%,=0.000;分别)。AMU 医院医师照护组的净效益和效益成本比(BCR)分别为每位患者 6846 美元和 1.33。
AMU 医院医师照护模式与多种成本的显著降低相关。敏感性分析的结果表明,AMU 医院医师照护的净效益估计与基线估计相似。因此,AMU 医院医师照护的总体净效益主要为正。