Gopalan Geetha, Lee Kerry A, Pisciotta Caterina, Hooley Cole, Stephens Tricia, Acri Mary
Hunter College - Silberman School of Social Work, 2180 Third Ave., New York, NY 10035.
Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research of Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010.
J Emot Behav Disord. 2023 Sep;31(3):204-218. doi: 10.1177/10634266221120532. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
This pilot study integrated quantitative and qualitative data to examine the feasibility of implementing a modified version of a multiple family group behavioral parent training intervention (The 4Rs and 2Ss for Strengthening Families Program [4Rs and 2Ss]) in child welfare (CW) placement prevention services, from the perspectives of participating caregivers ( = 12) and CW staff ( = 12; i.e., 6 caseworkers, 4 supervisors, and 2 administrators). Quantitative surveys were administered to caregivers and CW staff followed by semi-structured interviews to examine the feasibility of implementing the modified 4Rs and 2Ss program, as well as factors impacting feasibility. Results indicated that quantitative benchmarks for high feasibility were met in all assessed areas (e.g., family recruitment, caseworker fidelity ratings, CW staff feasibility ratings) except for family attendance, which was markedly lower than desired. Factors facilitating feasibility included agency and research support, intervention ease-of-use, perceived benefits to existing CW practice, as well as logistical support (e.g., food, transportation, childcare) promoting attendance. Factors hindering feasibility included conflicts between research-based eligibility criteria and existing client population demographics, research-related processes resulting in delays, CW staff role conflicts, added workload burden, complex family issues, and power differentials inherent to CW services which complicated families' voluntary participation.
这项试点研究整合了定量和定性数据,从参与的照顾者((n = 12))和儿童福利(CW)工作人员((n = 12);即6名个案工作者、4名主管和2名管理人员)的角度,检验在儿童福利安置预防服务中实施多家庭小组行为家长培训干预(加强家庭计划的4R和2S [4R和2S])修改版的可行性。对照顾者和CW工作人员进行了定量调查,随后进行了半结构化访谈,以检验实施修改后的4R和2S计划的可行性以及影响可行性的因素。结果表明,除家庭参与率明显低于预期外,在所有评估领域(如家庭招募、个案工作者忠诚度评分、CW工作人员可行性评分)均达到了高可行性的定量基准。促进可行性的因素包括机构和研究支持、干预的易用性、对现有CW实践的感知益处,以及促进参与的后勤支持(如食物、交通、儿童保育)。阻碍可行性的因素包括基于研究的资格标准与现有客户群体人口统计学之间的冲突、导致延误的研究相关流程、CW工作人员角色冲突、工作量增加、复杂的家庭问题,以及CW服务中固有的权力差异,这些因素使家庭的自愿参与变得复杂。