Suppr超能文献

复发性胰腺导管腺癌的手术切除或消融:根据复发类型的肿瘤学结局分析

Surgical Resection or Ablation for Recurrent Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis of Oncologic Outcomes According to the Recurrence Type.

作者信息

Lee Boram, Han Ho-Seong, Lee Jun Suh, Yoon Yoo-Seok

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Open. 2021 Sep 9;2(3):e096. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000096. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the survival benefits of curative-intent treatment (CIT, including surgery or ablation) for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) depending on the recurrence type and compared the survival outcomes with other treatment modalities.

BACKGROUND

The treatment for recurrent PDAC is mostly chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC). Still, the role of CIT for recurrent PDAC is not well established.

METHODS

PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy between 2004 and 2019 were included. Recurrences were categorized as locoregional (LR), distant, or disseminated. Recurrent PDAC management was classified as CIT, chemotherapy ± radiation therapy (CTX ± RTX), or BSC. The survival after recurrence (SAR) rate was measured from the first day of recurrence to the date of death or last follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighteen patients had recurrent PDAC and were analyzed (27 CIT, 128 CTX ± RTX, 63 BSC). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year SAR rates were 65.4%, 11.5%, and 11.5% for CIT, 42.1%, 4.0%, and 0% for CTX ± RTX, and 15.9%, 1.6%, and 0% for BSC, respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated the SAR rate was significantly better in the CIT group than in the CTX ± RTX and BSC groups in LR type ( = 0.027) and distant type ( < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the albumin level at recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-18.3, = 0.038) and operation time of the second operation (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-0.99, = 0.021) were associated with a favorable prognosis of SAR in the CIT group.

CONCLUSIONS

CIT should be considered in recurrent PDAC for LR and distant metastases in selected patients.

摘要

目的

根据复发类型评估根治性治疗(CIT,包括手术或消融)对复发性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的生存获益,并将生存结果与其他治疗方式进行比较。

背景

复发性PDAC的治疗大多是化疗或最佳支持治疗(BSC)。然而,CIT对复发性PDAC的作用尚未明确。

方法

纳入2004年至2019年间接受胰腺切除术的PDAC患者。复发分为局部区域(LR)、远处或播散性。复发性PDAC的治疗分为CIT、化疗±放疗(CTX±RTX)或BSC。从复发第一天到死亡或最后随访日期测量复发后生存率(SAR)。

结果

218例患者出现复发性PDAC并进行分析(27例CIT,128例CTX±RTX,63例BSC)。CIT组的1年、3年和5年SAR率分别为65.4%、11.5%和11.5%,CTX±RTX组分别为42.1%、4.0%和0%,BSC组分别为15.9%、1.6%和0%。亚组分析表明,CIT组在LR型(P = 0.027)和远处型(P < 0.001)的SAR率显著优于CTX±RTX组和BSC组。多因素分析显示,复发时白蛋白水平(风险比,2.14;95%置信区间,1.15 - 18.3,P = 0.038)和二次手术时间(风险比,0.98;95%置信区间,0.97 - 0.99,P = 0.021)与CIT组SAR的良好预后相关。

结论

对于复发性PDAC中LR和远处转移的选定患者,应考虑CIT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1e6/10455453/bc367bc51d5c/as9-2-e096-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验