Commentary: Quantifying the impact of bias to inform quality assessments in systematic reviews: The case of perchloroethylene and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
作者信息
Fox Matthew P, Mathur Maya B, Matthay Ellicott C
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
出版信息
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 17;4:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100090. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: Quantifying the impact of bias to inform quality assessments in systematic reviews: The case of perchloroethylene and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.评论：量化偏倚对系统评价中质量评估的影响：以全氯乙烯与非霍奇金淋巴瘤为例
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 17;4:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100090. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Systematic review of perchloroethylene and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.全氯乙烯与非霍奇金淋巴瘤的系统评价
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 16;4:100077. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100077. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Commentary on Methodologic choices in synthesizing epidemiologic evidence to assess perchloroethylene and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.关于综合流行病学证据以评估全氯乙烯与非霍奇金淋巴瘤的方法学选择的评论
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 18;4:100089. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100089. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Aspirin and the risk of Hodgkin's lymphoma in a population-based case-control study.一项基于人群的病例对照研究：阿司匹林与霍奇金淋巴瘤风险
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 18;96(4):305-15. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh038.
5
Environmental risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: umbrella review and comparison of meta-analyses of summary and individual participant data.非霍奇金淋巴瘤的环境危险因素：汇总分析及个体参与者数据的荟萃分析的综合评价与比较
BMJ Med. 2022 Jun 27;1(1):e000184. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000184. eCollection 2022.
6
Cardiovascular adverse events associated with cyclophosphamide, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone with or without rituximab ((R)-CDOP) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非霍奇金淋巴瘤中与环磷酰胺、聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松联合或不联合利妥昔单抗（(R)-CDOP）相关的心血管不良事件：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1060668. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1060668. eCollection 2022.
7
Sperm quality in Hodgkin's disease versus non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.霍奇金淋巴瘤与非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的精子质量
Hum Reprod. 1997 Jan;12(1):73-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.1.73.
8
Allergic conditions are not associated with the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.过敏状况与非霍奇金淋巴瘤或霍奇金淋巴瘤的风险无关：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Apr 18;10:2189-2198. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S128849. eCollection 2017.
9
Head and neck manifestations of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者中非霍奇金淋巴瘤的头颈部表现
Am J Otolaryngol. 2000 Jan-Feb;21(1):10-3. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(00)80118-0.
10
Diabetes mellitus associated with the occurrence and prognosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007 Oct;16(5):471-8. doi: 10.1097/01.cej.0000236253.93984.8f.
引用本文的文献
1
The role of study quality in aspartame and cancer epidemiology study reviews.研究质量在阿斯巴甜与癌症流行病学研究综述中的作用。
Glob Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 28;5:100110. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100110. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Response: Alternative approaches for systematic review.回应：系统评价的替代方法。
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 17;4:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100091. eCollection 2022 Dec.
本文引用的文献
1
Systematic review of perchloroethylene and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.全氯乙烯与非霍奇金淋巴瘤的系统评价
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 16;4:100077. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100077. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Methods to Address Confounding and Other Biases in Meta-Analyses: Review and Recommendations.解决荟萃分析中混杂和其他偏倚的方法：综述与建议。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:19-35. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-114020. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
3
Menopausal hormone therapy and women's health: An umbrella review.绝经激素治疗与女性健康：伞式综述。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 2;18(8):e1003731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003731. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Meta-Analyses.Meta分析中未测量混杂因素的敏感性分析
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(529):163-172. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1529598. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Robust Metrics and Sensitivity Analyses for Meta-analyses of Heterogeneous Effects.稳健性度量和敏感性分析在异质效应荟萃分析中的应用
Epidemiology. 2020 May;31(3):356-358. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001180.
6
The Problem With Mechanistic Risk of Bias Assessments in Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies and a Practical Alternative: Assessing the Impact of Specific Sources of Potential Bias.观察性研究证据综合中机械性偏倚风险评估的问题及一种实用的替代方法：评估潜在偏倚特定来源的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Sep 1;188(9):1581-1585. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz131.
7
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.科学家们奋起反对统计显著性。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
8
New metrics for meta-analyses of heterogeneous effects.新的荟萃分析异质效应度量指标。
Stat Med. 2019 Apr 15;38(8):1336-1342. doi: 10.1002/sim.8057. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.观察性研究中的敏感性分析：引入 E 值。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
10
TRICHLOROETHYLENE, TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, AND SOME OTHER CHLORINATED AGENTS.三氯乙烯、四氯乙烯及其他一些氯化剂。
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2014;106:1-512.
Zotero 插件