Suppr超能文献

全氯乙烯与非霍奇金淋巴瘤的系统评价

Systematic review of perchloroethylene and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

作者信息

Goodman Julie E, Ticknor Rebecca C, Zhou Jean

机构信息

Gradient, One Beacon St., 17th Floor, Boston, MA 02108, United States of America.

Gradient, 600 Stewart St., Suite 1900, Seattle, WA 98108, United States of America.

出版信息

Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 16;4:100077. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100077. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of epidemiology studies that evaluated the association between perchloroethylene (PCE) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This included an independent detailed assessment of a few critical aspects of study quality (i.e., study design, exposure measurement, exposure levels, and potential confounding), and a consideration of other aspects of quality less formally. Of the identified 18 cohort studies of 15 unique cohorts, 17 case-control studies of 14 unique population groups, and 3 ecological studies, none was high quality for all four critical quality elements and each study also had other major methodological study limitations. Reported risk estimates were mostly null, ranged widely from below to above 1, and often had extremely wide confidence intervals (CIs), indicating unstable risk estimates. In addition, there was no consistent evidence of dose-response. Overall, given the low quality of the available epidemiology studies, the evidence does not support an association between PCE exposure and NHL.

摘要

我们对评估全氯乙烯(PCE)与非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)之间关联的流行病学研究进行了系统综述。这包括对研究质量的几个关键方面(即研究设计、暴露测量、暴露水平和潜在混杂因素)进行独立详细评估,并对质量的其他方面进行较不正式的考量。在已识别的15个独特队列的18项队列研究、14个独特人群组的17项病例对照研究和3项生态研究中,没有一项在所有四个关键质量要素上都是高质量的,并且每项研究还存在其他主要方法学研究局限性。报告的风险估计大多为零,范围从低于1到高于1广泛分布,并且通常具有极宽的置信区间(CI),表明风险估计不稳定。此外,没有一致的剂量反应证据。总体而言,鉴于现有流行病学研究质量较低,证据不支持PCE暴露与NHL之间存在关联。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of perchloroethylene and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.全氯乙烯与非霍奇金淋巴瘤的系统评价
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 16;4:100077. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100077. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Response: Alternative approaches for systematic review.回应:系统评价的替代方法。
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 17;4:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100091. eCollection 2022 Dec.

引用本文的文献

4
Response: Alternative approaches for systematic review.回应:系统评价的替代方法。
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 17;4:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100091. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Commentary: On the reliability of causal claims.评论:论因果关系断言的可靠性。
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 17;4:100087. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100087. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验