• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可再生能源是否能改善环境质量?来自 RECAI 国家的证据。

Does renewable energy improve environmental quality? Evidence from RECAI countries.

机构信息

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology Puducherry, Karaikal, India.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):100717-100730. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29402-y. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-29402-y
PMID:37639093
Abstract

Since 1990, the ecological footprints have been increasing significantly with a continuous increase rate, which led to challenges to environmental quality. The basis for economic growth was said to be the shift of energy and environmental strategies toward a sustainable future. Indeed, it became a matter of proclaimed acceptance that environmental challenges nurtured expansion, innovation, and competitiveness. Climate change is the most pressing issue being faced by the world due to an increase in ecological footprint from 7.0 billion to 20.6 billion GHA. It indicates the seriousness of environmental degradation; therefore, nations need to ensure environmental sustainability. Keeping this in mind, the present research mainly aims to examine the impact of renewable energy utilization on the ecological footprints of RECAI economies, spanning the period from 1990 to 2020. To significantly achieve the research objective, we utilized panel econometric methods for empirical analysis. The results of long-run elasticities indicate that both renewable energy utilization as well as trade openness significantly controls the ecological footprints, while higher conventional energy utilization and economic growth significantly impede environmental sustainability. The empirical findings provide new insights for policymakers on renewable energy for the betterment of environmental quality in RECAI countries.

摘要

自 1990 年以来,生态足迹持续显著增加,增长率不断上升,这对环境质量构成了挑战。据说,经济增长的基础是能源和环境战略向可持续未来的转变。事实上,人们已经公开承认,环境挑战促进了扩张、创新和竞争力。由于生态足迹从 70 亿增至 206 亿公顷,气候变化成为世界面临的最紧迫问题。这表明环境退化的严重性;因此,各国需要确保环境的可持续性。考虑到这一点,本研究主要旨在检验可再生能源利用对 RECAI 经济体生态足迹的影响,时间跨度为 1990 年至 2020 年。为了显著实现研究目标,我们利用面板计量经济学方法进行实证分析。长期弹性的结果表明,可再生能源的利用和贸易开放度都显著控制了生态足迹,而较高的传统能源利用和经济增长则显著阻碍了环境的可持续性。实证结果为决策者提供了有关可再生能源的新见解,以改善 RECAI 国家的环境质量。

相似文献

1
Does renewable energy improve environmental quality? Evidence from RECAI countries.可再生能源是否能改善环境质量?来自 RECAI 国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):100717-100730. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29402-y. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: a continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries.经济增长、能源利用、贸易政策和生态足迹之间的经验关系:中上收入国家按大洲的比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Nov;27(31):38995-39018. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
The role of renewable energy and total factor productivity in reducing carbon emissions: A case of top-ranked nations in the renewable energy country attractiveness index.可再生能源和全要素生产率在减少碳排放中的作用:以可再生能源国家吸引力指数排名靠前的国家为例。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;361:121220. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121220. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?中东欧国家金融发展、能源消耗、收入水平与生态足迹的关系:人力资本和生物承载力重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):31856-31872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
5
Towards sustainable resource management: A short and long-run dynamics of mineral production on ecological footprint.迈向可持续资源管理:矿产生产对生态足迹的短期和长期动态。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;364:121446. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121446. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
6
The influences of renewable electricity generation, technological innovation, financial development, and economic growth on ecological footprints in ASEAN-5 countries.可再生能源发电、技术创新、金融发展和经济增长对东盟五国生态足迹的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(37):51003-51021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14301-x. Epub 2021 May 11.
7
Exploring the impact of climate technology, financial inclusion and renewable energy on ecological footprint: Evidence from top polluted economies.探索气候技术、金融包容性和可再生能源对生态足迹的影响:来自污染最严重经济体的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0302034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302034. eCollection 2024.
8
Nexus between energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission: evidence from 10 highest fossil fuel and 10 highest renewable energy-using economies.能源消耗与二氧化碳排放之间的联系:来自10个化石燃料使用量最高和10个可再生能源使用量最高的经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):87901-87922. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21900-9. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
9
How does economic complexity affect ecological footprint in G-7 economies: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumptions and testing EKC hypothesis.经济复杂度如何影响 G7 经济体的生态足迹:可再生和不可再生能源消费的作用以及检验 EKC 假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(31):47647-47660. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19094-1. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
10
Environmental cost of natural resources, globalization, and economic policy uncertainty in the G-7 bloc: do human capital and renewable energy matter?自然资源的环境成本、全球化和 G7 集团的经济政策不确定性:人力资本和可再生能源是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(54):115081-115097. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30485-w. Epub 2023 Oct 25.