Synergies and gaps between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).

This article evaluates the synergies between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) by investigating their alignments, misalignments, and challenges in addressing sustainability. The analysis emphasizes the significance of a multi-level approach, positioning these methods at various levels, including philosophy, strategy, assessment, and communication. The findings demonstrate that both LCA and circularity assessment can serve as sustainability assessment methods for circularity strategies, despite existing gaps. However, neither approach can provide a complete picture of a system's environmental performance on its own. Data availability, diverse assumptions, spotlights and shadows (highlighted and neglected elements), multiple life cycles, products, functions, strategies, and as well as temporal aspects are identified as the main challenges in addressing sustainability. This article provides recommendations based on the lessons learned from each approach, suggesting the integration of their strengths and addressing challenges to achieve a comprehensive understanding of environmental sustainability and make informed decisions for a circular and sustainable future. These recommendations include using function-based models and the principles of prospective and dynamic LCAs for the development of future circularity assessments. Additionally, circularity assessment can be used to establish LCA models, aiding in identifying hotspots during the goal and scope definition, and determining allocation and weighting factors in both Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) and Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA).