Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
School of Kinesiology and Health, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Psychol Med. 2024 Mar;54(4):753-762. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002441. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
Although risk markers for depressive disorders (DD) are dynamic, especially during adolescence, few studies have examined how change in risk levels during adolescence predict DD onset during transition to adulthood. We compared two competing hypotheses of the dynamic effects of risk. The risk escalation hypothesis posits that worsening of risk predicts DD onset beyond risk level. The chronic risk hypothesis posits that persistently elevated risk level, rather than risk change, predicts DD onset.
Our sample included 393 girls (baseline age 13.5-15.5 years) from the adolescent development of emotions and personality traits project. Participants underwent five diagnostic interviews and assessments of risk markers for DD at 9-month intervals and were re-interviewed at a 6-year follow-up. We focused on 17 well-established risk markers. For each risk marker, we examined the prospective effects of risk level and change on first DD onset at wave six, estimated by growth curve modeling using data from the first five waves.
For 13 of the 17 depression risk markers, elevated levels of risk during adolescence, but not change in risk, predicted first DD onset during transition to adulthood, supporting the chronic risk hypothesis. Minimal evidence was found for the risk escalation hypothesis.
Participants who had a first DD onset during transition to adulthood have exhibited elevated levels of risk throughout adolescence. Researchers and practitioners should administer multiple assessments and focus on persistently elevated levels of risk to identify individuals who are most likely to develop DD and to provide targeted DD prevention.
尽管抑郁障碍(DD)的风险标志物是动态的,尤其是在青春期,但很少有研究探讨青春期风险水平的变化如何预测向成年期过渡时 DD 的发病。我们比较了风险动态效应的两种竞争假说。风险升级假说认为,风险恶化会预测 DD 发病,而不仅仅是风险水平。慢性风险假说则认为,持续升高的风险水平而不是风险变化,预测 DD 的发病。
我们的样本包括来自青少年情绪和人格特质发展项目的 393 名女孩(基线年龄 13.5-15.5 岁)。参与者每 9 个月接受一次五次诊断访谈和 DD 风险标志物评估,并在 6 年的随访中进行重新访谈。我们重点关注了 17 个成熟的 DD 风险标志物。对于每个风险标志物,我们通过使用前五轮数据的增长曲线模型,考察了风险水平和变化对第六轮首次 DD 发病的前瞻性影响。
在 17 个抑郁风险标志物中的 13 个标志物中,青春期的风险水平升高,而不是风险变化,预测了向成年期过渡时首次 DD 的发病,支持慢性风险假说。风险升级假说的证据很少。
在向成年期过渡期间首次出现 DD 的参与者在整个青春期都表现出较高的风险水平。研究人员和从业者应进行多次评估,并关注持续升高的风险水平,以识别最有可能发展为 DD 的个体,并提供有针对性的 DD 预防。