Suppr超能文献

协同设计如何在全球范围内用于解决疫苗犹豫问题?一项系统综述。

How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review.

作者信息

Alpeza Filipa, Avermark Helena, Gobbo Elisa, Herzig van Wees Sibylle

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2431380. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2431380. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Abstract

Improving vaccine confidence is a topic of major public health importance. Reasons for vaccine hesitancy are multifactorial, making it challenging to find strategies to address them. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the literature on how co-design has been used to reduce vaccine hesitancy. We searched six databases in March and October 2024. Eligible studies described the co-design process used to develop interventions for addressing vaccine hesitancy and increasing vaccine confidence. We assessed the quality of included studies, extracted and descriptively summarized the key data. Twenty-seven articles were included, 20 of which were based in a high-income setting. Most studies centered on the COVID-19 ( = 9) and HPV ( = 9) vaccines. Co-design yielded diverse interventions, with videos being the most common intervention format ( = 11). We observed substantial variations in the reporting style and terminology used within the studies and limited attempts to assess intervention effectiveness.

摘要

提高疫苗信任度是一个具有重大公共卫生意义的话题。疫苗犹豫的原因是多方面的,这使得找到解决这些问题的策略具有挑战性。本系统综述旨在综合关于如何通过共同设计来减少疫苗犹豫的文献。我们在2024年3月和10月检索了六个数据库。符合条件的研究描述了用于制定解决疫苗犹豫和提高疫苗信任度干预措施的共同设计过程。我们评估了纳入研究的质量,提取并描述性总结了关键数据。纳入了27篇文章,其中20篇基于高收入环境。大多数研究集中在新冠病毒疫苗(9篇)和人乳头瘤病毒疫苗(9篇)上。共同设计产生了多样化的干预措施,视频是最常见的干预形式(11篇)。我们观察到研究中报告风格和使用的术语存在很大差异,并且评估干预效果的尝试有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a67d/11639369/3ff956bdd12b/KHVI_A_2431380_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验