National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286799. eCollection 2023.
Achieving high COVID-19 vaccine booster coverage is an ongoing global challenge. Health authorities need evidence about effective communication interventions to improve acceptance and uptake. This study aimed to test effects of persuasive messages about COVID-19 vaccine booster doses on intention to vaccinate amongst eligible adults in Australia.
In this online randomised controlled trial, adult participants received one of four intervention messages or a control message. The control message provided information about booster dose eligibility. Intervention messages added to the control message, each using a different persuasive strategy, including: emphasising personal health benefits of booster doses, community health benefits, non-health benefits, and personal agency in choosing vaccination. After the intervention, participants answered items about COVID-19 booster vaccine intention and beliefs. Intervention groups were compared to the control using tests of two proportions; differences of ≥5 percentage points were deemed clinically significant. A sub-group analysis was conducted among hesitant participants.
Of the 487 consenting and randomised participants, 442 (90.8%) completed the experiment and were included in the analysis. Participants viewing messages emphasising non-health benefits had the highest intention compared to those who viewed the control message (percentage point diff: 9.0, 95% CI -0.8, 18.8, p = 0.071). Intention was even higher among hesitant individuals in this intervention group compared to the control group (percentage point diff: 15.6, 95% CI -6.0, 37.3, p = 0.150). Conversely, intention was lower among hesitant individuals who viewed messages emphasising personal agency compared to the control group (percentage point diff: -10.8, 95% CI -33.0, 11.4, p = 0.330), although evidence in support of these findings is weak.
Health authorities should highlight non-health benefits to encourage COVID-19 vaccine booster uptake but use messages emphasising personal agency with caution. These findings can inform communication message development and strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccine booster uptake. Clinical trial registration: Registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001404718); trial webpage: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622001404718.aspx.
实现高 COVID-19 疫苗加强针覆盖率是全球持续面临的挑战。卫生当局需要有关有效沟通干预措施的证据,以提高接受度和接种率。本研究旨在测试关于 COVID-19 疫苗加强针的说服性信息对澳大利亚合格成年人接种疫苗意愿的影响。
在这项在线随机对照试验中,成年参与者接受了四种干预信息之一或控制信息。控制信息提供了关于加强针接种资格的信息。干预信息在控制信息的基础上增加了每个信息,分别使用了不同的说服策略,包括:强调加强针的个人健康益处、社区健康益处、非健康益处以及个人在选择接种疫苗方面的自主权。干预后,参与者回答了关于 COVID-19 加强疫苗接种意愿和信念的项目。使用两个比例的检验比较干预组与对照组的差异;差异≥5 个百分点被认为具有临床意义。对犹豫不决的参与者进行了亚组分析。
在 487 名同意并随机分组的参与者中,有 442 名(90.8%)完成了实验并纳入分析。与观看控制信息的参与者相比,观看强调非健康益处的信息的参与者接种意愿最高(百分比差异:9.0,95%置信区间 -0.8,18.8,p = 0.071)。在该干预组中,犹豫不决的个体的接种意愿甚至更高,与对照组相比(百分比差异:15.6,95%置信区间 -6.0,37.3,p = 0.150)。相反,与观看强调个人自主权的信息的对照组相比,观看强调个人自主权的信息的犹豫不决的个体的接种意愿较低(百分比差异:-10.8,95%置信区间 -33.0,11.4,p = 0.330),尽管支持这些发现的证据很弱。
卫生当局应强调非健康益处,以鼓励 COVID-19 疫苗加强针的接种,但使用强调个人自主权的信息时应谨慎。这些发现可以为提高 COVID-19 疫苗加强针接种率的沟通信息制定和策略提供信息。临床试验注册:在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12622001404718)注册;试验网页:https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622001404718.aspx。