文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

基于机器学习理论的 2 型糖尿病风险预测模型的比较研究:一项横断面研究。

Comparative study on risk prediction model of type 2 diabetes based on machine learning theory: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.

Preventive Medicine and Hygienics, Dongguan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 29;13(8):e069018. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069018.


DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069018
PMID:37643856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10465890/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the prediction effects of six models based on machine learning theories, which can provide a methodological reference for predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was based on the monitoring data of chronic disease risk factors in Dongguan residents from 2016 to 2018. The multistage cluster random sampling method was adopted at each monitoring site, and 4157 people were finally selected. In the initial population, we excluded individuals with more than 20% missing data and eventually included 4106 subjects. DESIGN: K nearest neighbour algorithm and synthetic minority oversampling technique were used to process the data. Single factor analysis was used for preliminary selection of variables. The 10-fold cross-validation was used to optimise the parameters of some models. The accuracy, precision, recall and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the prediction effect of models, and Delong test was used to analyse the differences of AUC values of each model. RESULTS: After balancing data, the sample size increased to 8013, of which 4023 are patients with T2DM and 3990 in control group. The comparison results of the six models showed that back propagation neural network model has the best prediction effect with 93.7% accuracy, 94.6% accuracy, 92.8% recall and the AUC value of 0.977, followed by logistic model, support vector machine model, CART decision tree model and C4.5 decision tree model. Deep neural network has the worst prediction performance, with 84.5% accuracy, 86.1% precision, 82.9% recall and the AUC value of 0.845. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, six types of risk prediction models for T2DM were constructed, and the predictive effects of these models were compared based on various indicators. The results showed that back propagation neural network based on the selected data set had the best prediction effect.

摘要

目的:比较基于机器学习理论的 6 种模型的预测效果,为预测 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)风险提供方法学参考。

设置和参与者:本研究基于 2016-2018 年东莞居民慢性病危险因素监测数据。在每个监测点采用多阶段整群随机抽样方法,最终选取 4157 人。在初始人群中,我们排除了缺失数据超过 20%的个体,最终纳入 4106 例受试者。

设计:采用 K 最近邻算法和合成少数过采样技术处理数据。单因素分析用于初步选择变量。10 折交叉验证用于优化部分模型的参数。使用准确率、精密度、召回率和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)评估模型的预测效果,采用 Delong 检验分析各模型 AUC 值的差异。

结果:数据均衡后,样本量增加到 8013 例,其中 T2DM 患者 4023 例,对照组 3990 例。6 种模型的比较结果显示,反向传播神经网络模型预测效果最佳,准确率为 93.7%,精密度为 94.6%,召回率为 92.8%,AUC 值为 0.977,其次是 logistic 模型、支持向量机模型、CART 决策树模型和 C4.5 决策树模型。深度神经网络的预测性能最差,准确率为 84.5%,精密度为 86.1%,召回率为 82.9%,AUC 值为 0.845。

结论:本研究构建了 6 种 T2DM 风险预测模型,并基于多个指标比较了这些模型的预测效果。结果表明,基于所选数据集的反向传播神经网络具有最佳的预测效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2d/10465890/6eea4e15a805/bmjopen-2022-069018f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2d/10465890/429bb668fb8b/bmjopen-2022-069018f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2d/10465890/6eea4e15a805/bmjopen-2022-069018f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2d/10465890/429bb668fb8b/bmjopen-2022-069018f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2d/10465890/6eea4e15a805/bmjopen-2022-069018f02.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparative study on risk prediction model of type 2 diabetes based on machine learning theory: a cross-sectional study.

BMJ Open. 2023-8-29

[2]
Machine learning for characterizing risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a rural Chinese population: the Henan Rural Cohort Study.

Sci Rep. 2020-3-10

[3]
Application of machine learning algorithms in predicting HIV infection among men who have sex with men: Model development and validation.

Front Public Health. 2022

[4]
Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022-10-25

[5]
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-4-6

[6]
A personalized prediction model for urinary tract infections in type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning.

Front Pharmacol. 2024-1-5

[7]
Establishment of a risk prediction model for olfactory disorders in patients with transnasal pituitary tumors by machine learning.

Sci Rep. 2024-5-31

[8]
Machine Learning Models in Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction: Results from a Cross-sectional Retrospective Study in Chinese Adults.

Curr Med Sci. 2019-7-25

[9]
Application of supervised machine learning algorithms for classification and prediction of type-2 diabetes disease status in Afar regional state, Northeastern Ethiopia 2021.

Sci Rep. 2023-5-13

[10]
Explainable Machine Learning Techniques To Predict Amiodarone-Induced Thyroid Dysfunction Risk: Multicenter, Retrospective Study With External Validation.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-2-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Type 2 Diabetes Prediction Model in China: A Five-Year Systematic Review.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-8-15

[2]
Predicting three-month fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin changes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on multiple machine learning algorithms.

Sci Rep. 2023-9-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045.

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022-1

[2]
Applications of Machine Learning Predictive Models in the Chronic Disease Diagnosis.

J Pers Med. 2020-3-31

[3]
Application of three statistical models for predicting the risk of diabetes.

BMC Endocr Disord. 2019-11-26

[4]
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty: A Review.

J Arthroplasty. 2019-6-11

[5]
On the Prospects for a (Deep) Learning Health Care System.

JAMA. 2018-9-18

[6]
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Cognitive Computing: What Do These Terms Mean and How Will They Impact Health Care?

J Arthroplasty. 2018-2-27

[7]
The International Diabetes Federation World Diabetes Congress 2015.

Eur Endocrinol. 2015-8

[8]
Machine Learning and Data Mining Methods in Diabetes Research.

Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2017-1-8

[9]
SM-RuleMiner: Spider monkey based rule miner using novel fitness function for diabetes classification.

Comput Biol Med. 2017-2-1

[10]
Comparison of three data mining models for predicting diabetes or prediabetes by risk factors.

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012-10-16

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索