Suppr超能文献

胸腔镜辅助根治性食管切除术中的左主刀-右助手操作模式。

Left-primary & right-auxiliary operation mode in mediastinoscope-assisted radical esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Department of Surgical Division I, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Wusheng County, Guangan, 638400, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7884-7892. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10341-1. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) is the most minimally invasive esophagectomy procedure. It is a more challenging procedure and more difficult to be popularized than thoracoscopic surgery. We developed a new MATHE operation mode that provides a clearer visual field and makes the procedures simpler.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with esophageal cancer were divided into a control group (n = 29) and a study group (n = 51). The control group underwent classic MATHE, while the study group received modified MATHE. We compared the two groups on operation time; intraoperative blood loss; blood transfusion amount; incidence rate of lung infection, recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) injury, chylothorax, and anastomotic leakage; and upper mediastinal lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

The study group was significantly better than the control group in operation time (271.78 min vs. 322.90 min, p < 0.05), intraoperative blood loss (48.63 mL vs. 68.97 mL, p < 0.05), and left paratracheal lymph node (No. 4L) dissection rate (88.24% vs. 24.14%, p < 0.01). No significant differences were identified in the incidence rate of anastomotic leakage, lung complications, or RLNs injury between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The modified MATHE is easier to perform. Modified MATHE is significantly superior to classic MATHE in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and upper mediastinal lymph node dissection rate.

摘要

背景

胸腔镜辅助经食管裂孔食管癌切除术(MATHE)是最微创的食管癌手术方式。它是一种更具挑战性的手术,比胸腔镜手术更难普及。我们开发了一种新的 MATHE 手术模式,提供了更清晰的视野,使手术过程更简单。

方法

共有 80 例食管癌患者分为对照组(n=29)和研究组(n=51)。对照组行经典 MATHE,研究组行改良 MATHE。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、输血量、肺感染、喉返神经(RLN)损伤、乳糜胸和吻合口漏的发生率及上纵隔淋巴结清扫情况。

结果

研究组在手术时间(271.78 分钟 vs. 322.90 分钟,p<0.05)、术中出血量(48.63 毫升 vs. 68.97 毫升,p<0.05)和左气管旁淋巴结(No.4L)清扫率(88.24% vs. 24.14%,p<0.01)方面明显优于对照组。两组吻合口漏、肺部并发症或 RLN 损伤的发生率无显著差异。

结论

改良 MATHE 更容易操作。改良 MATHE 在手术时间、术中出血量和上纵隔淋巴结清扫率方面明显优于经典 MATHE。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验