Wieland Fredrik, Schumacher Anika, Roumans Nadia, van Blitterswijk Clemens, LaPointe Vanessa, Rademakers Timo
MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Open Res Eur. 2022 Sep 20;2:87. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14894.2. eCollection 2022.
Microscopy has revolutionised our view on biology and has been vital for many discoveries since its invention around 200 years ago. Recent developments in cell biology have led to a strong interest in generating spheroids and organoids that better represent tissue. However, the current challenge faced by many researchers is the culture and analysis of these three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures. With the technological improvements in reconstructing volumetric datasets by optical sections, it is possible to quantify cells, their spatial arrangement, and the protein distribution without destroying the physical organization. We assessed three different microwell culture plates and four analysis tools for 3D imaging data for their applicability for the analysis of 3D cultures. A key advantage of microwell plates is their potential to perform high-throughput experiments in which cell cultures are generated and analysed in one single system. However, it was shown that this potential could be impacted by the material composition and microwell structure. For example, antibody staining was not possible in a hydrogel microwell, and truncated pyramid-structured microwells had increased background fluorescence due to their structure. Regarding analysis tools, four different software, namely CellProfiler, Fiji/ImageJ, Nikon GA3 and Imaris, were compared for their accuracy and applicability in analysing datasets from 3D cultures. The results showed that the open-access software, CellProfiler and Fiji, could quantify nuclei and cells, yet with varying results compared to manual counting, and may require post-processing optimisation. On the other hand, the GA3 and Imaris software packages showed excellent versatility in usage and accuracy in the quantification of nuclei and cells, and could classify cell localisation. Together these results provide critical considerations for microscopic imaging and analysis of 3D cell cultures.
显微镜学彻底改变了我们对生物学的看法,自约200年前发明以来,它对许多发现都至关重要。细胞生物学的最新进展引发了人们对生成更能代表组织的球体和类器官的浓厚兴趣。然而,许多研究人员目前面临的挑战是这些三维(3D)细胞培养物的培养和分析。随着通过光学切片重建体积数据集的技术改进,在不破坏物理组织的情况下对细胞、其空间排列和蛋白质分布进行量化成为可能。我们评估了三种不同的微孔培养板和四种用于3D成像数据的分析工具对3D培养物分析的适用性。微孔板的一个关键优势是它们有潜力进行高通量实验,即在一个单一系统中生成并分析细胞培养物。然而,结果表明这种潜力可能会受到材料组成和微孔结构的影响。例如,在水凝胶微孔中无法进行抗体染色,而截顶金字塔结构的微孔由于其结构导致背景荧光增加。关于分析工具,比较了四种不同的软件,即CellProfiler、Fiji/ImageJ、尼康GA3和Imaris在分析3D培养物数据集时的准确性和适用性。结果表明,开源软件CellProfiler和Fiji可以对细胞核和细胞进行量化,但与手动计数相比结果有所不同,并可能需要进行后处理优化。另一方面,GA3和Imaris软件包在使用方面表现出出色的通用性,在细胞核和细胞量化方面准确性高,并且可以对细胞定位进行分类。这些结果共同为3D细胞培养物的显微成像和分析提供了关键的考虑因素。