• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从心理-社会-环境角度看待氡气空气污染物:当局、缓解承包商和居民对家庭氡气缓解的障碍和促进因素的看法。

A psycho-social-environmental lens on radon air pollutant: authorities', mitigation contractors', and residents' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to domestic radon mitigation.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

SCK CEN, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 15;11:1252804. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1252804. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1252804
PMID:37649784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10463182/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Radon is a major indoor air pollutant that poses a significant risk of lung cancer to those exposed in their homes. While mitigation of high radon levels in homes has been shown to be effective, home mitigation rates remain low. This study examines the barriers and facilitators to radon mitigation in homes from the perspectives of authorities responsible for radon risk management, the mitigation industry (contractors), and residents in four European countries (Belgium, Ireland, Slovenia, and the UK) with high radon risks and low mitigation rates.

METHODS

A multi-method approach was used to gather data from various stakeholders, including online surveys, content analysis of legal documents, group interviews, workshops, and focus groups.

RESULTS

Authorities, contractors, and residents identified various facilitators to radon mitigation, including legal requirements for mitigation, awareness campaigns, low mitigation costs, availability of financial support, accreditation of mitigation contractors, and a perception of radon as a health threat. However, barriers to mitigation were also identified, such as a lack of awareness, fragmented mitigation processes, and inadequate communication between stakeholders.

DISCUSSION

The study highlights the complexity of the radon mitigation process and suggests that interventions aimed at increasing mitigation rates should target stakeholders beyond just residents, such as constructors, health professionals, and policy makers. An integrated approach to radon mitigation, from policy to provision, is necessary to effectively lower levels of this indoor air pollutant.

摘要

简介

氡是一种主要的室内空气污染物,对那些在家中暴露于氡的人来说,会造成重大的肺癌风险。虽然已经证明降低家中氡含量是有效的,但家庭降低氡含量的比率仍然很低。本研究从负责氡风险管理的当局、氡治理行业(承包商)以及四个氡含量高且降低氡含量比率低的欧洲国家(比利时、爱尔兰、斯洛文尼亚和英国)的居民的角度,考察了家庭氡治理的障碍和促进因素。

方法

采用多方法手段从不同利益攸关方收集数据,包括在线调查、法律文件的内容分析、小组访谈、研讨会和焦点小组。

结果

当局、承包商和居民确定了各种促进氡治理的因素,包括治理氡的法律要求、宣传活动、低治理成本、获得财政支持的机会、治理承包商的认证以及对氡作为健康威胁的认识。然而,治理也存在障碍,例如缺乏认识、治理过程分散以及利益攸关方之间沟通不足。

讨论

本研究强调了氡治理过程的复杂性,并表明旨在提高治理率的干预措施应该针对除居民以外的利益攸关方,例如建筑商、卫生专业人员和政策制定者。从政策到供应,需要采取综合方法来有效地降低这种室内空气污染物的水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a33/10463182/0702fc004ef5/fpubh-11-1252804-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a33/10463182/0702fc004ef5/fpubh-11-1252804-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a33/10463182/0702fc004ef5/fpubh-11-1252804-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A psycho-social-environmental lens on radon air pollutant: authorities', mitigation contractors', and residents' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to domestic radon mitigation.从心理-社会-环境角度看待氡气空气污染物:当局、缓解承包商和居民对家庭氡气缓解的障碍和促进因素的看法。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 15;11:1252804. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1252804. eCollection 2023.
2
Radon mitigation survey among New York State residents living in high radon homes.对居住在高氡气房屋中的纽约州居民进行的氡气减排调查。
Health Phys. 1999 Oct;77(4):403-9. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199910000-00007.
3
Measuring societal attitudes and behaviours towards radon indoors: A case study of Slovenia.衡量社会对室内氡的态度和行为:以斯洛文尼亚为例
J Environ Radioact. 2024 Feb;272:107355. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107355. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Radon, an invisible killer in Canadian homes: perceptions of Ottawa-Gatineau residents.氡,加拿大民居中的无形杀手:渥太华-加蒂诺居民的认知。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Apr;110(2):139-148. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0151-5. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
5
Residents' perceptions of radon health risks: a qualitative study.居民对氡健康风险的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):1114. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7449-y.
6
A Mixed Methods Population Health Approach to Explore Radon-Induced Lung Cancer Risk Perception in Canada.采用混合方法的人群健康研究途径探索加拿大氡致肺癌风险感知。
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211039764. doi: 10.1177/10732748211039764.
7
Co-Designing Communication: A Design Thinking Approach Applied to Radon Health Communication.共同设计传播:应用于氡健康传播的设计思维方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4965. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064965.
8
Residents' perception and worldview about radon control policy in Canada: A pro-equity social justice lens.居民对加拿大氡控制政策的看法和世界观:公平社会正义视角。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;10:946652. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.946652. eCollection 2022.
9
Assessment and management of residential radon health risks: a report from the health Canada radon workshop.住宅氡健康风险的评估与管理:加拿大卫生部氡研讨会报告
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):735-58. doi: 10.1080/15287390500261281.
10
Awareness and perceptions of the risks of exposure to indoor radon: a population-based approach to evaluate a radon awareness and testing campaign in England and Wales.对室内氡暴露风险的认识和看法:一种基于人群的方法,评估英格兰和威尔士的氡意识和检测活动。
Risk Anal. 2011 Nov;31(11):1800-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01613.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-Term vs. Long-Term: A Critical Review of Indoor Radon Measurement Techniques.短期与长期:室内氡测量技术的批判性综述
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 15;24(14):4575. doi: 10.3390/s24144575.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-Designing Communication: A Design Thinking Approach Applied to Radon Health Communication.共同设计传播:应用于氡健康传播的设计思维方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4965. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064965.
2
A global burden assessment of lung cancer attributed to residential radon exposure during 1990-2019.1990-2019 年归因于住宅氡暴露的肺癌全球负担评估。
Indoor Air. 2022 Oct;32(10):e13120. doi: 10.1111/ina.13120.
3
Social factors and behavioural reactions to radon test outcomes underlie differences in radiation exposure dose, independent of household radon level.
社会因素和对氡测试结果的行为反应是导致辐射暴露剂量差异的基础,而与家庭氡水平无关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 14;12(1):15471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19499-5.
4
Characterization of Colorado residents and radon reduction behaviors through latent class analysis and path models.通过潜在类别分析和路径模型对科罗拉多州居民特征和氡气减排行为进行描述。
J Environ Radioact. 2022 Sep;250:106910. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106910. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
Suggestions for Improvements in National Radon Control Strategies of Member States Which Were Developed as a Requirement of EU Directive 2013/59 EURATOM.改善成员国国家氡控制策略的建议,这些建议是根据欧盟指令 2013/59 EURATOM 的要求制定的。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3805. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073805.
6
Evaluation of citizen science contributions to radon research.评估公民科学对氡研究的贡献。
J Environ Radioact. 2021 Oct;237:106685. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106685. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
7
Residential indoor air quality interventions through a social-ecological systems lens: A systematic review.从社会-生态系统视角出发的住宅室内空气质量干预措施:系统评价。
Indoor Air. 2021 Jul;31(4):958-976. doi: 10.1111/ina.12835. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
Comprehensive survey on radon mitigation and indoor air quality in energy efficient buildings from Romania.罗马尼亚关于节能建筑中的氡缓解和室内空气质量的综合调查。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 10;751:141858. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141858. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
9
Is internet a missed opportunity? Evaluating radon websites from a stakeholder engagement perspective.互联网是否错失了良机?从利益相关者参与的角度评估氡网站。
J Environ Radioact. 2020 Feb;212:106123. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106123. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
10
Radon exposure is rising steadily within the modern North American residential environment, and is increasingly uniform across seasons.氡气在现代北美住宅环境中的暴露量正稳步上升,且在各季节间日益均匀。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54891-8.