Meireles Anderson, Souza Hiago L R, Arriel Rhaí A, Ribeiro Guilherme G S, Rodrigues Alex B, DE Oliveira Géssyca T, Ide Bernardo N, Chagas Mauro H, Marocolo Moacir
Department of Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, BRAZIL.
Exercise Science, Healthy and Human Performance Research Group, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, BRAZIL.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Aug 1;16(2):1025-1037. doi: 10.70252/ITYD2629. eCollection 2023.
Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been an excellent strategy for enhancing sports performance recovery, although there is still no consensus on the ideal protocol. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of IPC with different cuff pressures (low pressure, medium pressure, and high pressure) on the attenuation of neuromuscular fatigue after an isometric test protocol. And to verify whether this improvement was related to muscle oxygen saturation during the test protocol. Thirty males (18-35 years old) with experience in resistance training were allocated to three different groups: low pressure (20 mmHg), medium pressure (100 mmHg), and high pressure (190 mmHg). The individual occlusion pressure of each participant was identified using ultrasound. Each participant performed two test protocols (8 maximal isometric contractions lasting 20-s with a 10-s rest interval) in an extension chair; after the first test protocol, the participant received the IPC intervention with a low, medium, or high cuff pressure or received the noncuff intervention (randomized order). Only the medium-pressure group showed a smaller decrease in mean force change compared to the no-cuff condition (-4.40% vs. -13.10%, p=0.01, respectively), and the low- and high-pressure groups did not exhibit significant pressure differences (IPC vs. noncuff: -8.40% vs. -13.10%, p=0.11 and -9.10% vs. -14.70%, p=0.12, respectively). Muscle oxygen saturation across test protocols showed no significant differences in all IPC conditions (p>0.05). Although, IPC with medium pressure was effective at optimizing the recovery of neuromuscular performance, this improvement is not related to an increase in muscle oxygen saturation during exercise.
缺血预处理(IPC)一直是提高运动表现恢复的一种出色策略,尽管对于理想方案仍未达成共识。因此,本研究旨在评估不同袖带压力(低压、中压和高压)的IPC对等长测试方案后神经肌肉疲劳减轻的影响。并验证这种改善是否与测试方案期间的肌肉氧饱和度有关。30名有抗阻训练经验的男性(18 - 35岁)被分配到三个不同组:低压(20 mmHg)、中压(100 mmHg)和高压(190 mmHg)。使用超声确定每位参与者的个体闭塞压力。每位参与者在伸展椅上进行两个测试方案(8次最大等长收缩,持续20秒,休息间隔10秒);在第一个测试方案后,参与者接受低、中或高袖带压力的IPC干预或接受无袖带干预(随机顺序)。与无袖带情况相比,只有中压组的平均力变化下降较小(分别为 - 4.40% 对 - 13.10%,p = 0.01),而低压和高压组未表现出显著的压力差异(IPC与无袖带:分别为 - 8.40% 对 - 13.10%,p = 0.11和 - 9.10% 对 - 14.70%,p = 0.12)。在所有IPC条件下,测试方案中的肌肉氧饱和度均无显著差异(p>0.05)。尽管中压IPC在优化神经肌肉性能恢复方面有效,但这种改善与运动期间肌肉氧饱和度的增加无关。