• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000 年至 2020 年美国国家酒精调查中患有酒精使用障碍的居民中匿名戒酒会参与度的差异。

Disparities in Alcoholics Anonymous Participation from 2000 to 2020 Among U.S. Residents With an Alcohol Use Disorder in the National Alcohol Survey.

机构信息

Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville, California.

Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Jan;85(1):32-40. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00086. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.23-00086
PMID:37650830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10846609/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mutual-help groups (MHGs) like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) are effective for resolving alcohol use disorders (AUDs), but few studies have examined disparities in MHG participation, particularly recently. We used five waves of National Alcohol Survey data to investigate whether prevalence of AA attendance among those with a lifetime AUD differed by race/ethnicity, age, and sex, directly testing whether these associations varied with time.

METHOD

Analyses pooled weighted data from 2000 to 2020, including only participants with a lifetime AUD and identifying as non-Hispanic White, Latinx/Hispanic, or non-Hispanic Black/African American ( = 8,876). Logistic regression models examined associations between lifetime AA attendance and survey year, race/ethnicity, age, and sex; models also tested for differences in demographic effects across survey year using interaction terms.

RESULTS

In bivariate models, AA attendance was significantly less prevalent among participants identifying as Latinx/Hispanic (vs. White); ages 18-29 (vs. 30-64); and female (vs. male). Survey year was unrelated to AA attendance, and all interactions involving survey year were nonsignificant. In the final multivariate model (which controlled for severity and other help-seeking), disparities persisted for those identifying as Latinx/Hispanic (vs. White; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.63) and ages 18-29 (vs. 30-64; aOR = 0.35); AA attendance was also less prevalent among Black/African American (vs. White) participants (aOR = 0.59), but sex became nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Results replicate and extend sparse findings regarding disparities in MHG attendance and suggest a stagnation in AA's growth and reach to underserved populations. Findings highlight the need to more effectively facilitate MHG attendance (and perhaps broader social network change) among racial/ethnic minorities and emerging adults.

摘要

目的

互助小组(如匿名戒酒会)对于解决酒精使用障碍(AUD)非常有效,但很少有研究探讨互助小组参与方面的差异,尤其是最近的研究。我们使用了五次全国酒精调查数据,调查了一生中 AUD 的参与者中 AA 出勤率是否因种族/民族、年龄和性别而异,直接检验了这些关联是否随时间变化而变化。

方法

我们对 2000 年至 2020 年的加权数据进行了分析,仅包括一生中 AUD 并自认为是非西班牙裔白人、拉丁裔/西班牙裔或非西班牙裔黑人和非洲裔美国人(=8876)的参与者。逻辑回归模型检验了一生中 AA 出勤率与调查年份、种族/民族、年龄和性别之间的关联;模型还使用交互项检验了人口统计学效应在调查年份之间的差异。

结果

在双变量模型中,拉丁裔/西班牙裔(与白人相比);年龄在 18-29 岁(与 30-64 岁);以及女性(与男性相比),AA 出勤率明显较低。调查年份与 AA 出勤率无关,且所有涉及调查年份的交互项均无统计学意义。在最终的多变量模型中(控制了严重程度和其他寻求帮助的因素),与白人相比,拉丁裔/西班牙裔(调整后的优势比[OR] = 0.63)和 18-29 岁(与 30-64 岁相比;调整后的 OR = 0.35)的参与者中仍存在差异;黑人和非洲裔美国人(与白人相比)AA 出勤率也较低(调整后的 OR = 0.59),但性别变得无统计学意义。

结论

结果复制并扩展了关于互助小组参与差异的稀疏发现,并表明 AA 在服务不足人群中的增长和影响力停滞不前。这些发现强调了需要更有效地促进少数族裔和年轻成年人参与互助小组(或许还有更广泛的社交网络变化)。

相似文献

1
Disparities in Alcoholics Anonymous Participation from 2000 to 2020 Among U.S. Residents With an Alcohol Use Disorder in the National Alcohol Survey.2000 年至 2020 年美国国家酒精调查中患有酒精使用障碍的居民中匿名戒酒会参与度的差异。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Jan;85(1):32-40. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00086. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
A moderating role for gender in racial/ethnic disparities in alcohol services utilization: results from the 2000 to 2010 national alcohol surveys.性别在酒精服务利用的种族/族裔差异中的调节作用:2000年至2010年全国酒精调查结果
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Aug;38(8):2286-96. doi: 10.1111/acer.12500. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
3
Rates and predictors of Alcoholics Anonymous attendance across sexual orientations.不同性取向者参加匿名戒酒会的比率和预测因素。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Oct;129:108400. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108400. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
4
Cigarette Use Among Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorders in the United States, 2002 to 2016: Trends Overall and by Race/Ethnicity.2002 年至 2016 年美国酒精使用障碍患者的吸烟状况:总体趋势及种族/民族差异。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Jan;43(1):79-90. doi: 10.1111/acer.13922. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
5
Mode of mutual-help group attendance: Predictors and outcomes in a US national longitudinal survey of adults with lifetime alcohol use disorder.互助组参与模式:美国一项针对有终生酒精使用障碍的成年人的全国性纵向调查中的预测因素和结果。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Sep;164:209395. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209395. Epub 2024 May 11.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in perception of provider cultural competence among patients with depression and anxiety symptoms: a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional analysis.抑郁和焦虑症状患者感知提供者文化能力的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性、基于人群、横断面分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):957-968. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00285-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
7
Disparities in Alcohol Treatment Use at the Intersection of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Insurance.种族、族裔、性别和保险交叉层面上酒精治疗使用情况的差异
Subst Use Addctn J. 2025 Jan;46(1):78-89. doi: 10.1177/29767342241278871. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
8
Ethnic disparities in clinical severity and services for alcohol problems: results from the National Alcohol Survey.酒精问题临床严重程度及服务方面的种族差异:全国酒精调查结果
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Jan;31(1):48-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00263.x.
9
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mutual Help Group Participation for Substance Use Problems.种族/民族差异在物质使用问题互助小组参与方面的体现。
Alcohol Res. 2021 Mar 11;41(1):03. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v41.1.03. eCollection 2021.
10
The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity of a brief egocentric social network assessment in adults with alcohol use disorder: Direct comparison of 5-alter and 20-alter versions.成人酒精使用障碍患者简短自我中心社交网络评估的效度:5个 alters 和 20 个 alters 版本的直接比较。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1037/adb0001092.
2
Second-wave mutual-help groups: Examining effectiveness for individuals with alcohol use disorders in the longitudinal, U.S. national PAL Study cohorts.第二波互助小组:在美国全国性纵向 PAL 研究队列中,对患有酒精使用障碍的个体的有效性进行研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jul 23:104921. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104921.
3
Comparing recovery community centers (RCCs) serving Black, Hispanic/Latino, and other communities: an exploratory secondary data analysis of a nationwide survey of RCC directors.比较为黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔及其他社区服务的康复社区中心(RCCs):一项对RCC主任全国性调查的探索性二次数据分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;13:1532488. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532488. eCollection 2025.
4
Developing Evidence-Informed Support Groups for Families of Incarcerated People: Findings From a Qualitative Study.为被监禁者家属建立基于证据的支持小组:一项定性研究的结果
Fam Process. 2025 Jun;64(2):e70042. doi: 10.1111/famp.70042.
5
Predictors of concerned others' Al-Anon attendance and involvement following adults' entry into treatment for an alcohol use disorder.成年人因酒精使用障碍接受治疗后,他人参加戒酒互诫协会及参与情况的预测因素。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1111/acer.70085.
6
Beyond the 5-year recovery mark: Perspectives of researchers with lived and living experience on public engagement and discourse.超越 5 年的康复期:具有生活和生存经验的研究人员对公众参与和讨论的看法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Nov;133:104599. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104599. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
7
Levels and outcomes of 12-step participation among sexual and gender minority subgroups.性少数和性别少数亚群中 12 步参与的水平和结果。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Dec;167:209519. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209519. Epub 2024 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal assessment of drinking changes during the pandemic: The 2021 COVID-19 follow-up study to the 2019 to 2020 National Alcohol Survey.大流行期间饮酒变化的纵向评估:2019 至 2020 年全国酒精调查对 2021 年 COVID-19 的后续研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Jun;46(6):1050-1061. doi: 10.1111/acer.14839.
2
Mental health and drinking to cope in the early COVID period: Data from the 2019-2020 US National Alcohol Survey.新冠早期的心理健康和饮酒应对:来自 2019-2020 年美国国家酒精调查的数据。
Addict Behav. 2022 May;128:107247. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107247. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
3
Mutual-help group participation for substance use problems in the US: Correlates and trends from 2002 to 2018.美国互助小组参与解决物质使用问题的情况:2002年至2018年的相关因素及趋势
Addict Behav. 2022 May;128:107232. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107232. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
4
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mutual Help Group Participation for Substance Use Problems.种族/民族差异在物质使用问题互助小组参与方面的体现。
Alcohol Res. 2021 Mar 11;41(1):03. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v41.1.03. eCollection 2021.
5
Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder.戒酒互助会及其他针对酒精使用障碍的12步康复计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 11;3(3):CD012880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012880.pub2.
6
Harmful drinking, tobacco, and marijuana use in the 2000-2015 National Alcohol Surveys: Examining differential trends by sexual identity.2000-2015 年全国酒精调查中的有害饮酒、吸烟和大麻使用情况:按性身份分析差异趋势。
Subst Abus. 2021;42(3):317-328. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1709251. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
7
Odds Ratios-Current Best Practice and Use.优势比——当前的最佳实践与应用
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):84-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6971.
8
A longitudinal study of the comparative efficacy of Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART Recovery, and 12-step groups for those with AUD.一项关于女性戒酒互助会、生命之环互助会、SMART 康复互助会和 12 步互助会对 AUD 患者疗效的比较的纵向研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 May;88:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
9
The Future of Research on Alcohol-Related Disparities Across U.S. Racial/Ethnic Groups: A Plan of Attack.美国不同种族/族裔群体的酒精相关差异研究的未来:进攻计划。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Jan;79(1):7-21. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.7.
10
Comparison of 12-step groups to mutual help alternatives for AUD in a large, national study: Differences in membership characteristics and group participation, cohesion, and satisfaction.在一项大型全国性研究中,对酒精使用障碍(AUD)的12步团体与互助替代方案的比较:成员特征、团体参与度、凝聚力和满意度的差异
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Feb;73:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 6.